1 / 25

Assessing the demographic impact of international migration in Cambridgeshire

Assessing the demographic impact of international migration in Cambridgeshire. Julia Gumy (Research Officer – Population) The Research Group. September 2008. Outline of the presentation. Aim of the research Migration in Cambridgeshire Data and Methodology Results Policy implications

lamis
Download Presentation

Assessing the demographic impact of international migration in Cambridgeshire

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessing the demographic impact of international migration in Cambridgeshire Julia Gumy (Research Officer – Population) The Research Group September 2008

  2. Outline of the presentation • Aim of the research • Migration in Cambridgeshire • Data and Methodology • Results • Policy implications • Conclusions

  3. Why migration? • Apparent increase in international migration • Questions: • Is migration really increasing? • Can we measure it? • Which are the areas affected? • Which are the main groups migrating? • How does this affect our population? • Which services do we need to provide?

  4. Aim of the research To assess the current and future impact of international migration in Cambridgeshire’s population...... …..with a focus on migrant workers

  5. Data sources

  6. Limitations of the data • Administrative data sources not designed to monitor migration • Ilustrate inflows but not outflows • No indication on length of stay • Do not represent stock of migrants • Data sources cannot be linked, which means: • Different sample of overseas citizens • Different fields of information • Different time periods • Data cannot provide estimates of the number of migrants in Cambridgeshire or elsewhere

  7. Strengths of the data • Allow us to study trends • When compared, the data can confirm observed patterns • Provide information at small geographical areas • Some data sources can be indicators of intended length of stay (e.g. GP data, ESOL enrolments)

  8. Methodology • Collection of the data since the year 2001 • Data cleansing and re-organisation • Categorisation in continents of origin • Reconciliation of the NINos and WRS where possible • Analysis and comparison of data sources: • Trend analysis • Estimation of international migration

  9. Methodology • No data on length of stay or intentions • Development of return rate scenarios: Result: ‘most likely’ estimate of the number of migrant workers in Cambridgeshire

  10. Cambridgeshire • In the 2001 Census, 9% of the population in Cambridgeshire was born outside the UK Source: 2001 Census

  11. Rank of LAs in the EoE

  12. Rank of Cambridgeshire districts in the UK

  13. Work registrations by continent of origin in Cambs Around 30,000 non-UK born people have registered to work in Cambridgeshire since 2001 The highest numbers of migrants are Polish, Lithuanians and Indians

  14. Work registrations by year of registration in Cambs Source: NINOs data

  15. Work registrations by district and nationality in Cambs Source: NINOs

  16. Impact in Cambridgeshire • Our best estimate is 61,500 non-UK born people in Cambridgeshire • 11% of the current population, 2 percentage points more than in 2001 • Most of the non-UK population would be Western European and Asian • ONS estimates 69,000 (CI +/- 14,000) non-UK born citizens in Cambs (Source: Annual Population Survey)

  17. Change since 2001 Sources: 2001 Census, NINos/WRS data

  18. Characteristics of migrants • Eastern Europeans • Short-term migrants • Young (18-34) • Mostly males • Unaccompanied • Employment dependant on the district • Do not register with a GP (or perhaps not immediately) • Not many registered for language courses

  19. Characteristics of migrants • Western Europeans • High presence in industrial areas • Employment linked to high-tech industry or University • Short-term migration patterns • Take up summer jobs and learn English • Mostly young • Evidence of some families with children • Do not register with a GP • Not many registered for language courses

  20. Characteristics of migrants • Asians • Constant flow of Asians • Decrease in the number of registrations • Evidence of some families with children • Americans • Mostly linked to the armed forces • Africans • Low numbers • Most migrants from South Africa • Oceania • Most migrants from Australia

  21. Policy Implications • Identification of priorities based on results Two examples: • Community Cohesion Strategy • Targeted communication measures • Access to guidance for employers to set minimum standards for migrant workers • Joint Strategic Needs Assessment • Identify gaps and inequalities in the provision of health care • Provide evidence for the NHS Cambridgeshire priorities

  22. Conclusions The demographic impact: • International migration has increased since 2001 • How does this affect Cambridgeshire’s population? • We estimate that 11% of Cambridgeshire’s population in 2006 was born outside the UK, indicating a slight increase since 2001, when the Census counted 9% • The origin mix could have slightly changed • Western Europeans and Asians would be the largest groups of non-UK born people in Cambridgeshire • We found evidence to suggest numbers of new migrants may have already begun to decline

  23. Conclusions • Measurement of migration • We need better data • Data tailored to study migration • Better quality of the data • More harmonisation • Easier data linkage • Information at small geographical levels • Better data protection • Development of large scale longitudinal surveys • New Migrant Databank (NMD) • Population register - National Identity Register (NIR) • 2011 Census

  24. Conclusions • Promote information sharing between academic and local government research: • To improve understanding of migration flows • Fill knowledge gaps • Share knowledge • Share best practices • Achieve good quality results

  25. For more information: The Research Group Cambridgeshire County Council Shire Hall Castle Hill Cambridge CB3 0AP E-mail: research.group@cambridgeshire.gov.uk Tel: 01223 715300

More Related