1 / 33

A Critical Point for Science?

Brian Josephson explores the idea that current physics may be incomplete, proposing a new conceptual foundation in which life and mentality are more fundamental than matter.

lannyj
Download Presentation

A Critical Point for Science?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture to the Cambridge University Physics Society March 5th., 2008 Brian D. Josephson TCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10 NB: slides need to be advanced manually! A Critical Point for Science? A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  2. Basic themes: • Current physics implicitly assumes matter is fundamental, life and mentality being secondary • There are reasons for thinking that such a picture may be incomplete, leading to error • A new conceptual foundation reverses the order of things, making life and mentality more basic than matter. A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  3. Wheeler’s picture(see The Goldilocks Enigma by Paul Davies) • Cosmos > Life > Mind > Cosmos Picture based on ‘participatory observers’ A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  4. Thanks to: Tethys Carpenter Samantha Parton Stu Kauffman Steve Rosen A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  5. Picture Credits Parton and Rosen: Brian Josephson Carpenter: Simon Keynes Kauffman: http://www.science.tamu.edu/story3.asp?storyID=465 A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  6. Physics has always presumed matter Newtonian mechanics e-m theory/classical mechanics Basic QM Quantum field theory String/M theory • Matter (‘things’) features at every stage A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  7. What is/may be left out • Observer problem • Life (complementarity) • Higher cognitive capacities • Paranormal phenomena A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  8. Observer issue What we see is not what we get (from the theory) [many worlds problem: the statistical interpretation helps only if one avoids looking too closely!] A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  9. Life issue Measuring a biosystem may change its properties (Bohr) QM provides no clear specification for dealing with ‘unprepared systems’; there is no clarity regarding ‘quantum organisation’. A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  10. Higher-capacities problem Again, there is little clarity as to how one might explain, e.g.: • Mathematical insight • Musical appreciation • ESP, etc. A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  11. Gravity problem • Gravity can’t be fitted into Standard Model • Extending this to fit makes ‘What You See’ still further from ‘What You Get From The Theory’ (many extra dimensions) A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  12. The epicycle saga • Epicycles gave quantitatively correct results but were ultimately seen not to be the right approach: ‘magnitudes are not everything!’ • Might science similarly be wrong re mind and life? A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  13. Which is more fundamental? • Usual view: matter is more fundamental, and life emerges from it • Alternative: life, mentality etc. emerge from a more fundamental level of existence A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  14. Wheeler’s picture • Cosmos > Life > Mind > Cosmos Picture based on ‘participatory observers’ Problem: idea too vague Remedy: find a more advanced formulation of the idea! A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  15. How to make life/mind fundamental? • Start with a fundamental theory of life Use this as the basis for everything (instead of starting with a conventional theory) A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  16. The spinoff, given a proper theory: • ‘Mind’ would decide what a universe should be like, not ingenious schemes dreamt up by physicists following the latest bandwaggon! • Mind decides on basis of what would best support life, > biofriendly universe. A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  17. The Critical Point Origin of critical-point idea: Samantha Parton on musical creativity (from interview with Triste magazine): “when you stare into that space and that deepness, you get close to the place where things begin, and that's a [good] place to be … [for making music]” Tc A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  18. Then ... … an article by Stuart Kauffman et al. in Nature reminded me that I had in my office a copy of Kauffman’s book ‘The Origins of Order’! A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  19. A different order of things • Kauffman proposes that life happens at ‘the edge of chaos’, a situation poised between order and disorder • Bohm refers to ‘unmanifest order’ becoming manifest • Rosen refers instead to ‘apeiron’, a ‘primal chaos’, from which order springs A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  20. Some key concepts • Edge of chaos • Structures • Differential stability • Attractor • ‘Smart systems’ A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  21. Smart systems • Stable • Cooperate to form smart complexes • ‘do things’, compute (= I/O + dynamics) • Communicate, make requests, anticipation • Mutual support in a group • Societies live longer • Melt-freeze strategy at edge of chaos • Development of specialisations A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  22. Manifestations of mind • Direct; or • Indirect via universes mind universe manifestations A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  23. Minds and universes • ‘Deep’ life can use mind to build universes • Mind needs universes that • It knows how to build (symmetry?) • Are useful • Elegance as such is not of interest! A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  24. Space and time • Space: a resource that things can move around in, provides proximity, separation, place • Scientist time: a resource that assists synchronisation, ‘being on time’: time like that shown by a clock, not ‘actual time’ A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  25. Space and time are non-trivial! Space: act of becoming separate Time: cycles Space and time represent organisation (Rosen, after Heidegger) A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  26. Space-time going cheap! Space-time Universes are created, and organised — somehow! (cf. flocking of birds, termites’ nests) A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  27. ESP deep level (‘pre-space’) universe level space M2 M1 A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  28. Creativity • Can all of creativity (e.g. higher maths, subtle music) be understood biologically? • Does it instead come from our deeper source? A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  29. Source of music? • Place where things begin • Comprehensible ‘germs’ • Like a gene, function in a computer program • Elementary components that can perform tasks and which we can learn to combine A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  30. What are the components of mind? • Atoms of mind are the units of intelligence, elementary ideas, are ‘physical’ at this deep level, come from self-organisation. • Ideas are systems with a specific inner dynamics, manifesting in their ability to organise and to create. A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  31. In conclusion • We have proposed an extension of science • Where will this lead? • Will strange, taboo ideas become a respectable part of science? Telepathy, ‘memory of water’, ‘cold fusion’? Scientific theology, intelligent design? Occult Sciences Tripos? CU Institute of Astrology? A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  32. References (books) • Stuart Kauffman: the Origins of Order • Paul Davies: the Goldilocks Enigma • Steven Rosen: the Self-Evolving Cosmos A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

  33. References (web) • Video lecture: Can the Physicists' Description of Reality be Considered Complete? • Limits to the Universality of Quantum Theory • Beyond Quantum Theory: a realist psychobiological interpretation of physical reality (with Michael Conrad and Dipankar Home) • String Theory, Universal Mind and the Paranormal • What can Music tell us about the Nature of the Mind: a Platonic Model (with Tethys Carpenter) • “The place where things begin”: Samantha Parton interview in Triste magazine A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson

More Related