1 / 16

Building Rubrics that Align with Standards & Documenting Candidates’ Effects on Student Learning

Building Rubrics that Align with Standards & Documenting Candidates’ Effects on Student Learning. Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment; Instructor, College of Education Paul Alley, Project Director, College of Education

lars-sutton
Download Presentation

Building Rubrics that Align with Standards & Documenting Candidates’ Effects on Student Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Building Rubrics that Align with Standards & Documenting Candidates’ Effects on Student Learning Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment; Instructor, College of Education Paul Alley, Project Director, College of Education Kathy Hildebrand, Ph.D., Assistant Dean of Assessment & Continuous Improvement, College of Education

  2. Workshop Objectives • Define what a rubric is and multiple uses of rubrics • Apply step-by-step procedures for developing a rubric • Research existing SPA or discipline developed rubrics • Align rubrics with SPA or discipline standards

  3. Rubrics • Definition: “At its most basic, a rubric is a scoring tool that lays out the specific expectations for an assignment. Rubrics divide an assignment into its component parts and provide a detailed description of what constitutes acceptable or unacceptable levels of performance for each of those parts.” (Stevens & Levi, 2005, p. 3)

  4. Rubrics • Benefits • Improve students’ end products & increase learning • Assists with clearly communicating assignment expectations to students and teaching assistants • Improve consistency of grading • Speed up grading • Once a quality rubric is created it can be adapted to new situations or assignments

  5. Rubric-Outcomes Alignment • Step 0: Develop Rubric-Outcomes Alignment Table • Purpose: Document alignment between standards and assessments in order to produce necessary program and unit level reports (Educational Technology Example)

  6. Developing Rubrics • Step 1: What are the essential learning objectives of your assignment? • Usually these are found in your assignment description and/or listed in the objectives of your course. • In the case of a summative or signature assignment, there should be “Core” objectives/outcomes that are aligned to the SPA or discipline standards you hope to measure by selecting this assignment (Word Doc Example)(TaskStream Rubric Wizard)

  7. Developing Rubrics • Step 2: Choose the criteria to be evaluated. Name the evidence to be produced. • Describe the best work you could expect* • Describe the worst acceptable work you might expect* • Develop intermediate-level descriptions* * Hint: These criteria can be developed based on past student work on similar projects, observation of presentations, interviews with students, tutors, TAs, in cooperation with instructors of similar courses, adaptation of other rubrics, or SPA provided definitions.

  8. Developing Rubrics • Step 2 (cont.): • Choosing number of levels for summative/signature assignments: • Levels should correspond with the categories put forth by NCATE: Approaches, Meets or Exceeds • If there is not direct alignment, then you will need to note how the data should be interpreted in terms of these three levels for both your SPA report and for purposes of summarizing data for unit level reports (Example Reviewer Forms: National Recognition Report & Review Worksheet)

  9. Developing Rubrics • Step 2 (cont.) : • An alternative is for student’s to help generate the rubric criteria. • Why? To improve the student’s motivation, interest, and performance in the project through increased participation and control. • A second alternative is to adapt an existing rubric to the specified assignment • Resources: Specialized Professional Association web sitesRubiStar: http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.phpTaskStream Rubric Wizard, Sample RubricsUniversity Rubric Banks (see slides 12 & 13)

  10. Example • Original Rubric, Participation Rubric for Unit Development created by Dr. Barbara Frandsen at St. Edward's University, • St_ Edward's University.htm (http://www.stedwards.edu/cte/resources/grub.htm) • Adapted Participation Rubric created for group project in ETC 545: Internet for Educators • Group_Participation_Rubric.htm(http://www4.nau.edu/assessment/oaainfo/workshop/Rubrics/Group_Participation_Rubric.htm)

  11. Developing Rubrics • Step 3: Pilot the Rubric. Apply the rubric to a sample of student work; ask a colleague for feedback; and ask NCATE coordinating staff members (i.e., Kathy Hildebrand or Cynthia Conn) to review. • Step 4: Email to TaskStream Project Director, Paul Alley via TaskStream (if possible): • Rubric(s) and associated assignment instructions for all summative/signature assignments • Completed Rubric-Outcomes Alignment Table

  12. Developing Rubrics • Step 5: Distribute the rubric to students before they begin the assignment. • Step 6: Evaluate the end product. Compare individual students' work with the rubric to determine level of achievement. • Step 7: Revise and review the rubric based on the results of use. Note: The “Core” elements related to SPA or discipline standards should remain consistent. • Initial Rubric:InitialCurriculumWebScoringRubric.pdf(http://www4.nau.edu/assessment/oaainfo/workshop/Rubrics/InitialCurriculumWebScoringRubric.pdf) • Revised Rubric:ETC545CurriculumWebProjectRubric.htm(http://www4.nau.edu/assessment/oaainfo/workshop/Rubrics/ETC545CurriculumWebProjectRubric.htm)

  13. Online Rubric Banks • University of Wisconsin, School of Education: Professional Development: Rubric Bank • http://www.uwstout.edu/soe/profdev/rubrics.shtml • A listing and links to Seven-categories (many of the categories with 10-12+ rubrics each) of rubrics. Some of the rubrics are not specifically designed for higher education. • Collaboration Rubrics • http://edweb.sdsu.edu/triton/tidepoolunit/Rubrics/collrubric.html • http://www.sdcoe.k12.ca.us/score/actbank/collaborub.html • University of Dallas: Dallas Area Network for Teaching and Education: Rubric Bank • http://dante.udallas.edu/edu5352/rubrics.htm • Shrock’s Rubric Bank • http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/assess.html#web

  14. Online Rubric Banks • Northern Arizona University, Liberal Studies Writing and Oral Communication Rubrics • http://www4.nau.edu/assessment/assessment/liberal/index.htm • Northern Arizona University, English 105 Essay Rubrics • http://dana.ucc.nau.edu/~shd2/eng 105.htm

  15. Developing A Rubric: Online Resources • Create Your Own Rubrics Online • Online Teacher Rubric Resources • http://www.kenton.k12.ky.us/tr/rubrics.html This page has excellent links to many different rubric generators. • Electronic Rubric Tools • RubiStar • http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php “An online tool to help the teacher who wants to use rubrics but does not have the time to develop them from scratch. Start with the tutorial (it includes information on changing categories, their headings and content). Register (free) with them so that you can save & edit what you create.” (Heidi Goodrich Andrade, Ohio University) • Rubric Builder (Free trial download for 30 days) • http://www.rubricbuilder.on.ca/ • Rubrics Generator (free) • http://www.teach-nology.com/web_tools/rubrics/ • Rubricator ($49.95) • http://www.rubrics.com • Rubric Construction Set (free) • http://landmark-project.com/classweb/tools/rubric_builder.php3

  16. Sources • Maki, P. L. (2004) Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution. Stylus Publishing, LLC. Virginia. • Allen, M. J. (2004) Assessing academic programs in higher education. Anker Publishing Co. Inc. Massachusetts. • Stevens, D. D. & Levi, A. J. (2005) Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Stylus Publishing LLC. Sterling, Virginia. • Creating rubrics: Inspire your students and foster critical thinking. (2000-2005) Pearson Education, Inc. http://www.teachervision.fen.com/page/4521.html

More Related