400 likes | 558 Views
AGENDA. Welcome - IntroductionsOverview of MTSASEAYP - ComponentsAYP - ComputingAYP - Status ReportsAYP - After the DeterminationWork in Progress!. .
E N D
1. MONTANA STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM for EDUCATION (MTSASE)
2. AGENDA
5. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
6. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
7. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
8. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
9. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
10. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
11. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
21. The threshold for this indicator has been set at 80% or progress from the previous year towards that threshold.
Montana’s statewide average for both 2002 and 2003 in K-8 attendance was 94%
This is seen as a “minimum” – it is expected that schools and districts will continue the practice of working for maximum attendance rates possible by their students
22. The threshold for this indicator has been set at 80% or progress from the previous year towards that threshold.
Montana’s statewide average for 2001 was 82% and for 2002 was 84%
This is seen as a “minimum” – it is expected that schools and districts will continue the practice of working for maximum graduation rates by their students
23. “Estimated cohort group” formula is used for determining graduation (completion) rate.
Given Year Graduates (g)
(g + Alt Comg+ 9thgD+ 10thgD+ 11thgD+ 12th Dg)
D = Dropouts
Alt Com = Completers of HS by other means
34. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
35. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
36. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
37. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
38. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
39. State Accountability System(MTSASE)
41. State Accountability System(MTSASE)