1 / 17

Metro Scheduling

Metro Scheduling. By Philip Anderson & Liza John. Metro Scheduling. Case Study Real world Practice. A simple example Model. Station 2. Station 1. Station 3. λ 3. λ 2. λ 1. A simple example Arrival Rates.

lavender
Download Presentation

Metro Scheduling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Metro Scheduling By Philip Anderson & Liza John

  2. Metro Scheduling • Case Study • Real world Practice

  3. A simple example Model Station 2 Station 1 Station 3 λ3 λ2 λ1

  4. A simple example Arrival Rates Passenger arrival at each station can be modeled as a Poisson process having time variable rate λ. λi t

  5. A simple example Arrival Rates λ t

  6. A simple example Arrival Rates λi λis s t

  7. A simple example Destination Probabilities Pijs Matrix: Probability that a passenger who entered station i will get off at station j. For j ≤ I P = 0. j 1 2 3 1 2 3 i

  8. A simple example • Define: • Let r be the time interval between trains. • From the Central Limit Theorem Nis (the number of passengers at Mi for period s) is normally distributed having mean r(λis) an variance r(λis) . • Objective: • Create a schedule for period s by specifying r to minimize cost and guarantee capacity constraints

  9. A simple example Constraints: • Train capacity: C • r {4,…,20} • Not reaching capacity 95 percent of the time.

  10. A simple example Find the smallest r to satisfy all the equations: 95% => z = 1.65 Equation 1: Equation 2:

  11. A simple example Results: First select the smallest r from solving equation 1 and 2. If r is > then 20 assign the minimum of the two If r is between 4 and 20 assign that value If r is less then 4 then we cannot guarantee this level of confidence.

  12. A simple exampleSecond Look • Trains are jobs • Stations are machines • Flow shop algorithm • Fm | prmu | Lmax • Because the order of the stations, machines, cannot change, the real problem is figuring out how many trains, jobs, can be completed with the given expressed constraints, and still hold true to the station schedule 12

  13. A simple exampleSecond Look • Rush Hours • 6:30AM - 9:30AM and 3:30PM - 8:00PM • Regular Population Density Hours • 9:30AM - 3:30PM and 8:00PM - 12:00AM • Late Night Hours • 12AM - 6:30AM

  14. A simple example Second Look • Different times in the day allow for different lengths of wait time • During rush hours people will be waiting around 4 minutes • During regular hours people will be waiting around 7 minutes • During late night hours people will be waiting around 20 minutes

  15. Simulation • TOWARD INCREASED USE OF SIMULATION TRANSPORTATION • Dudley Whitney, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. • INVESTIGATING THE CAPACITY OF A METRO LINE BY MEANS OF A SIMULATION MODEL • A Ballis*, K Liberis and T Moschovou • SIMULATORS USED BY WMATA • Martin Lukes

  16. SimulationTOWARD INCREASED USE OF SIMULATION TRANSPORTATION • Construction Feasibility: • Signal Design: • Power Consumption: • Traffic Studies: • Railroad Capacity Studies: • Train Operations Studies:

  17. SimulationTOWARD INCREASED USE OF SIMULATION TRANSPORTATION • Perceived high cost • Tight budgets • Tight schedules How to address these issues? http://trainlogic.net/sim_wmata.htm

More Related