1 / 29

Congressional Politics in the Northwest

Congressional Politics in the Northwest. Parallels between 1994, 2006 in Washington’s 5 th District. Questions for discussion. Why did the Northwest enjoy unprecedented influence in Congress between 1970 and 1995? What were themes and messages in House races in 1994, 2006?

leanne
Download Presentation

Congressional Politics in the Northwest

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Congressional Politics in the Northwest Parallels between 1994, 2006 in Washington’s 5th District

  2. Questions for discussion • Why did the Northwest enjoy unprecedented influence in Congress between 1970 and 1995? • What were themes and messages in House races in 1994, 2006? • How have demographic & economic changes affected Northwest politics? • How will national politics affect this race?

  3. Where is the 5th District?

  4. Who is this man?

  5. Who is this man? • Thomas S. Foley • Represented 5th District, 1965-1995 • Speaker of the U.S. House, 1989-1995 • U.S. ambassador to Japan, 1997-2001

  6. Why was Foley so successful? • Family: Deep roots in eastern Washington • Mentors: Sens. Henry Jackson and Warren Magnuson • “In politics, it’s better to be lucky than to be good… Tom Foley was both.”

  7. Why was Foley so successful? • Good committee assignments: Agriculture, Interior • Moderate Democrat, attracted Republican support • In the right place at the right time to advance in leadership • Survived ‘Reagan Revolution’ of 1980 (other Democrats lost) • Succeeded Jim Wright as speaker, 1989

  8. Foley’s Qualities • Memory, connections • Story teller, sense of humor • Attention to process, rather than issues • Defender of Congress as an institution

  9. Foley’s opponents • 1966-1992: series of ‘dingbats’ • Single-issue candidates • Extremists • Underfunded, lacked support of state party • Why no serious opposition? • Foley co-opted Spokane business establishment • Republicans recognized value of Foley’s seniority • He paid attention to his constituency

  10. 1994: Turning point • Demographic changes in 5th District • Migration, especially from California • Aging of traditional Foley voters • Economics • Decline of unions • Shift away from agricultural base • Resource management conflicts (timber, mining)

  11. Coincidence of issues (1992-94) • Clinton’s unpopularity • Term limits (and Foley’s longevity in Washington) • House Bank, Post Office scandals • Anti-incumbent sentiment

  12. A credible GOP opponent • George Nethercutt • WSU graduate • Former U.S. Senate aide • Attorney, civic volunteer • Spokane County GOP chairman

  13. A credible GOP opponent • George Nethercutt • Theme: ‘the only Republican who can beat Tom Foley’ • Defeated two former Foley opponents in September primary

  14. The 1994 Campaign • The Gingrich factor • ‘Contract with America’ • Alliance with Rush Limbaugh, talk radio • Attempt to nationalize House elections • Referendum on Clinton’s record

  15. Campaign strategy • Which issues do you think George Nethercutt emphasized in his challenge? • How did he portray himself to voters? • Which issues did Foley emphasize in his bid for re-election? • How did he defend his record?

  16. Nethercutt’s message

  17. Nethercutt’s message • TV commercials • 30 years • Minor Problem • Bonanza

  18. Foley’s message • TV commercials • Call • Talk • Cuts

  19. The Results • District 5 • Nethercutt, 110,057 (50.9%) • Foley, 106,075 (49.1%) • Nationally • Republicans take control of House for first time since 1954 • Newt Gingrich becomes speaker of the House

  20. Could Foley have survived? • Yes, but… • …with a different strategy • Starting earlier (after 1992 election) • Mending fences in district, especially with liberals • Pushing to reform House rules, policies • …and different tactics • More aggressive ads, emphasizing value of seniority • Rapid-response squad to Republican attacks

  21. The rest of the story • Nethercutt reneges on pledge to retire after 3 terms, serves five terms • Challenges Patty Murray for U.S. Senate in 2004 • Murray takes 55% of vote • Cathy McMorris elected to replace Nethercutt

  22. 2006: Parallels to 1994? • Unnpopular president • Scandals in Congress • Frustration with ‘gridlock’ • Anti-incumbent sentiment • Attempt to make congressional elections national referendum

  23. Republican incumbent • Cathy McMorris • Born 1969 • Family orchard, fruit stand in Stevens County • 10 years in Washington Legislature • Elected to Congress, 2004, with 59% of vote

  24. Democratic challenger • Peter Goldmark • Bron 1945 • Rancher from Okanogan • Ph.D. scientist • Former Washington state secretary of agriculture, WSU regent

  25. Campaign strategies • Which issues do you think Peter Goldmark is raising in his challenge? • What aspects of his background does he emphasize? • Which issues is Cathy McMorris emphasizing in her bid for re-election? • How does she defend her record? • Who do you think will win?

  26. Campaign commercials • http://www.votepetergoldmark.com/ • http://www.cathyforcongress.com/cathyforcongress/

  27. Latest polling • Results • Cathy McMorris (R): 45 percent • Peter Goldmark (D): 38 percent • Methodology • 350 interviews with random sample of likely voters. • Interviews conducted Sept, 13-17, 2006. • Sampling error is +/- 5.2 percent. • Pollster: Lake Research (hired by Goldmark)

  28. What happens next? • Democrats spending money on Goldmark ads: • “McMorris’s Democratic opponent is Peter Goldmark, a rancher whose surprising strength has attracted the support of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which last week began spending $323,000 on television ads opposing McMorris.” (The Washington Post, 10/24) • http://www.dccc.org/races/emerging_races/ • Will RCCC come to McMorris’ defense?

More Related