1 / 8

Summary of EGEE review

Summary of EGEE review. Bob Jones, EGEE Technical Director CERN 15/02/2005. EGEE EU Review – Agenda. Wednesday, 09/02/05 PM: chair: Dieter Kranzlmüller Overview: Status of Project Status of Production Service and applications Thursday, 10/02/05 AM: Mirco Mazzucato

lecea
Download Presentation

Summary of EGEE review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Summary of EGEE review Bob Jones, EGEE Technical Director CERN 15/02/2005

  2. EGEE EU Review – Agenda • Wednesday, 09/02/05 PM: chair: Dieter Kranzlmüller • Overview: Status of Project • Status of Production Service and applications • Thursday, 10/02/05 AM: Mirco Mazzucato • Networking, User Training and Induction • Application Demonstrations • Thursday, 10/02/05 PM: Manuel Delfino • Development/Re-Engineering (gLite) • Security and deployment • Friday, 11/02/05 AM: Robin Middleton • Dissemination, Outreach, and Policies • Plans for Next Period • Conclusions • Friday, 11/02/05 PM: Fabrizio Gagliardi • Feedback from Reviewers Presentations material: http://agenda.cern.ch/age?a043803 Bob Jones - summary of 1st EU review of EGEE project

  3. Project Review Team 5 independent experts nominated by EU: • Phil Andrews - Program Director for High-End Computing at the San Diego Supercomputer Center • Karsten Decker - Decker Consulting GmbH • Satoshi Matsuoka - Professor, Global Scientific Information and Computing (GSIC) Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology • Jean Pierre Prost - IT architect at the EMEA (Europe/Middle-East/Asia) Design Center for e-business on demand within IBM France ATS PSSC, Montpellier Center • Leandros Tassiulas - Professor Computer Engineering and Telecommunications Dept. University of Thessaly, Greece • EU project and administration officers: • Kyriakos Baxevanidis • Christopher Kowalski Bob Jones - summary of 1st EU review of EGEE project

  4. Appraisal of work performed • EGEE has made a very good and quick start • mgmt task equivalent to starting a medium sized enterprise • Starting from LCG-2 gave rapid application start-up • Migrating to gLite is encouraged given the identified short-comings of LCG-2 • The quality of the deliverables produced in very high • >60 deliverables/milestones during the first 9 months • Good penetration in scientific communities • But not much in others: executives/politicians • Training and education is impressive by design and implementation • Produced a detailed and precise write-up of the in-depth operational needs of a structure this size • A diversity of applications has been shown Bob Jones - summary of 1st EU review of EGEE project

  5. Appraisal of work performed: concerns • Migration plan from LCG-2 to gLite • Need to define a definite end-date for LCG-2 to encourage migration of applications • Some application demos did not demonstrate the scientific advantage of the grid • Need to keep current users happy and manage expectations • The long-term planning for (network) communication infrastructure in not very clear and must be improved upon • Not clear what JRA4’s Bandwidth Allocation Reservation and Network Performance Monitoring will bring as advantages to the applications Bob Jones - summary of 1st EU review of EGEE project

  6. Preliminary Findings • Manpower • Staff retention is a major issue for a 2 year project • Industry Forum • is a good idea but needs a stronger engagement and commitment by a more diversified industrial and commercial community • gLite • March deadline for gLite is very ambitious - understand this refers to pre-production but migration to production service must be planned • Must strengthen resources in testing tasks • Migration should be application driven: identify those applications which will be the first to migrate • Keep long-term view of working towards standardization • Dissemination • Good but should work better for non-technical communities (politicians, executives) Bob Jones - summary of 1st EU review of EGEE project

  7. Concluding remarks • All deliverables accepted • Excellent quality but can be more concise • Minor text corrections to periodic report • Contract amendment was requested by project no EU • TERENA was not requested by EU to organise IST event – it was a common agreement Bob Jones - summary of 1st EU review of EGEE project

  8. Next Steps • Period can be changed from 9 to 15 months • Must be requested by the project • As contract amendment with updated TA • A new deliverable related to concertation across EU projects will be requested • Drop management report & cost claims at PM18 • Maintain intermediate review after PM18 (likely early Dec’05) • But make it focused - exact subjects to be given later • Will take into account PM18 deliverables • Expanding resources • Partners encouraged to make use of new EU calls (March’05) to submit related proposals where extra resources are required • Support for new communities etc. • A written version of these verbal conclusions will be provided within 2 weeks Bob Jones - summary of 1st EU review of EGEE project

More Related