1 / 12

Chapter 4

Chapter 4. Perceiving Persons. Social Perception. The process by which people come to understand one another. We’ll look at: The “raw data” of social perception How we explain and analyze behavior How we integrate our observations into coherent impressions of other persons

leila-marsh
Download Presentation

Chapter 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 4 Perceiving Persons

  2. Social Perception • The process by which people come to understand one another. • We’ll look at: • The “raw data” of social perception • How we explain and analyze behavior • How we integrate our observations into coherent impressions of other persons • How our impressions can subtly create a distorted picture of reality • We’re both perceiver and target

  3. Observation: The Elements of Social Perception—Persons • First impressions are often subtly influenced by different aspects of a person’s appearance. • We prejudge people based on facial features. • We read traits from faces, as well as read traits into faces, based on prior information. • We judge “baby-faced” adults differently than “mature-faced” adults. • Why? Explain the explanation.

  4. Silent Language of Nonverbal Behavior • Behavioral cues are used to identify a person’s inner states, as well as his or her actions. • What kinds of nonverbal cues do people use? • Facial expressions of emotion and ….

  5. Distinguishing Truth from Deception • Freud: “No mortal can keep a secret… betrayal oozes out of him at every pore.” • Channels of communication differ in terms of ease of control. • Face is relatively easier for deceivers to control. • Nervous movements of our body are somewhat harder to control.

  6. Why Do We Have Difficulty Detecting Deception? • Mismatch between the behavioral cues that actually signal deception and the ones used to detect deception. • Four channels of communication provide relevant information: • Words: Cannot be trusted • Face: Controllable • Body: Somewhat more revealing than face • Voice: Most revealing cue • Perceivers tune in to the wrong channels

  7. Attribution Theories • Dispositions: stable characteristics, such as personality traits, attitudes, and abilities • Attribution theories describe how people explain the causes of behavior • Heider: Explanations can be grouped into two categories: • Personal Attributions (Internal disposition) • Situational Attributions (External)

  8. Attributional Biases • Do we really analyze behavior in a rational, logical manner? • Do we really have the time, motivation, or cognitive capacity for such elaborate and mindful processes? • The answer? • Sometimes yes…Sometimes no.

  9. Cognitive Heuristics • Cognitive heuristics are information-processing rules of thumb. • Enable us to think in ways that are quick and easy • Problem is that using cognitive heuristics can frequently lead to error.

  10. Availability Heuristic • The tendency to estimate the likelihood that an event will occur by how easily instances of it come to mind. • Problems with relying on the availability heuristic: • False-consensus effect

  11. Fundamental Attribution Error • When we explain other people’s behavior we tend to: • Overestimate the role of personal factors, and • Overlook the impact of situations

  12. The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy • The process by which one’s expectations about a person eventually lead that person to behave in ways that confirm those expectations. • Rosenthal & Jacobson’s (1968) “Pygmalion in the Classroom” study

More Related