1 / 26

Lisa Reynolds Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP January 29, 2013

Lisa Reynolds Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP January 29, 2013. Roadless Areas. Approximately 30% of national forest lands Excludes wilderness areas, national parks Generally undeveloped, 5,000 acres or greater Important characteristics: High quality or undisturbed soil, water and air

len-higgins
Download Presentation

Lisa Reynolds Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP January 29, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lisa Reynolds Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP January 29, 2013

  2. Roadless Areas • Approximately 30% of national forest lands • Excludes wilderness areas, national parks • Generally undeveloped, 5,000 acres or greater • Important characteristics: • High quality or undisturbed soil, water and air • Sources of public drinking water • Diversity of plant and animal communities

  3. Roadless Area Protection • Watershed protection • Biological diversity • Outdoor recreation • High quality scenery

  4. History of Roadless Area Management • Pre-2001: Forest plans • 2001 • Nationwide Roadless Area Conservation Rule • 66 Fed. Reg. 3244 (Jan. 12, 2001) • Superseded Forest plans • Litigation • Preliminary injunction issued by District of Idaho (May) • Vacated by Ninth Circuit (October) ……continued

  5. History, cont’d • cont’d • 2003 • Federal judge in Wyoming enjoined the 2001 Rule • 2005 • Bush administration repealed 2001 Rule and adopted “State Petitions Rule” • Challenge filed in California district court • 10th Circuit dismissed appeal of Wyoming injunction of 2001 Rule as moot • 2006 • California district court vacated State Petitions Rule and reinstated 2001 Rule • Forest Service announced it would accept state petitions under the APA, section 553(e) • Gov. Owens submitted petition for Colorado Rule

  6. History, cont’d • 2007 • Wyoming challenged the 2001 Rule • 2008 • Wyoming federal district court invalidated and enjoined the 2001 Rule, creating conflict with California district court decision to reinstate 2001 Rule • USFS published DEIS on Colorado Rule • 2009 • 9th Circuit affirmed reinstatement of 2001 Rule • Obama administration appealed the Wyoming court injunction of the 2001 Rule

  7. History, cont’d • 2010 • Colorado submitted revised petition • 2011 • USFS published Revised DEIS on Colorado Rule • 10th Circuit vacated Wyoming injunction, upholds 2001 Rule • 2012 • Final approval and adoption of the Colorado Rule

  8. Administrative Procedures Act Section 553(e) • Section 553: Rulemaking • (e) Each agency shall give an interested person the right to petition for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule.

  9. State Specific Rules • 2008: Idaho Roadless Area Management • 36 C.F.R. §§ 294.20-29 • 2012: Colorado Roadless Area Management • 36 C.F.R. §§ 294.40-49

  10. 2001 Rule • No new or reconstructed roads • No logging or other tree-cutting • No new mineral leases allowing for road construction • Limited exceptions • Allows motorized uses, grazing, oil and gas development that do not require road construction

  11. Colorado’s Roadless Rule • Updates inventory of roadless acreage • 4,186,000 acres in roadless areas • Retains the general approach of 2001 • No tree-cutting • No road-building • Adds “Upper Tier” protections • Expands exceptions to general prohibitions • Restricts linear construction zones

  12. Colorado’s Roadless Areas U.S. Department of Agriculture

  13. The Upper Tier • Upper Tier Areas • 1,219,000 acres (approx. ¼) • Road construction permitted only • If necessary for reserved or outstanding rights • To protect public safety (fire, flood, other imminent catastrophic event) • Tree-cutting permitted if • Incidental to implementation of a management activity • Personal or administrative use

  14. Colorado Roadless Areas Upper Tier Acres U.S. Department of Agriculture

  15. Expanded Exceptions under the Colorado Rule • Energy development • Oil and gas • Coal • Water projects • Wildfire prevention/hazardous fuels management • Ski areas

  16. Oil and Gas Development in Roadless Areas • Pre-2012 leases: • Rights under existing leases are unaffected • “Gap leases” • Post-2012 leases: • Upper Tier: NSO stipulations required • Non-Upper Tier: road construction prohibited

  17. Gap leases Map Courtesy of Pew Environment Group

  18. Coal Resource Development • Exception for North Fork area • 19,000 acres • Permits temporary roads for exploration and development • Includes methane venting

  19. Water Resource Systems in Colorado Roadless Areas • Upper Tier: linear construction zones • Non-Upper Tier: road construction • Water conveyance structure must be • Operated pursuant to “pre-existing water court decree” • Includes absolute and conditional rights applied for on or before July 3, 2012

  20. Wildfire/Hazardous Fuels • Community Protection Zones (CPZs) • Within ½ mile of at-risk community • Within 1.5 miles of if identified in Wildfire Protection Plan or has certain geographic features • Tree-cutting permitted in non-Upper Tier • In CPZ, to protect at-risk community or municipal water supply (non-Upper Tier only) • Anywhere in or out of CPZ if “significant risk” to municipal water supply system • Temporary road permitted within first ½ mile of CPZ

  21. Linear Construction Zones • In 10th Circuit: LCZs are not roads, so not prohibited by 2001 Rule • Wilderness Workshop v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, 531 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 2008) • Colorado Rule generally prohibits linear construction zones in Roadless Areas with major exceptions

  22. Linear Construction Zones Permitted • Upper tier • Water conveyance structures (ditches, canals, and dams) • For reserved and outstanding rights • Non-upper tier • Water conveyance structures • Transmission lines • Oil and gas pipelines (no pass-throughs) • Telecommunications lines • Regional Forester approval required

  23. Safeguards • Responsible Official or Regional Forester approval • Watershed conservation practices • Maintenance or improvement of roadless area characteristics • Limited road use • NEPA requirements

  24. Resources • USFS Roadless Area Conservation website: • fs.usda.gov/roadless/ • Includes Colorado Roadless Rule website with NEPA documents • Earthjustice Timeline • http://earthjustice.org/print/features/timeline-of-the-roadless-rule

  25. Major Roadless Rule Court Opinions • Kootenai Tribe of Idaho v. Veneman, 313 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2002) (denying request for preliminary injunction against 2001 Rule) • Wilderness Workshop v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, 531 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 2008) (Bull Mountain Pipeline case) • Wyoming v. United States Dep’t of Agriculture, 570 F. Supp.2d 1309 (D. Wyo. 2008) (vacating 2001 Rule) • State of California ex rel. Lockyer v. United States Dep’t of Agriculture, 575 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2009) (rejecting 2005 State Petitions Rule and reinstating 2001 Rule) • Wyoming v. United States Dep’t of Agriculture, 661 F.3d 1209 (10th Cir. 2011) (upholding and reinstating the 2001 Rule)

  26. Questions

More Related