1 / 21

Matthew Stevens Funded by the Community Benefit Fund

Betting on the evidence: The case of gambling-related problems amongst the Indigenous population of the Northern Territory. Matthew Stevens Funded by the Community Benefit Fund. Recent political climate in the NT. Little Children are Sacred (Wild & Anderson 2007)

leola
Download Presentation

Matthew Stevens Funded by the Community Benefit Fund

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Betting on the evidence: The case of gambling-related problems amongst the Indigenous population of the Northern Territory Matthew Stevens Funded by the Community Benefit Fund

  2. Recent political climate in the NT • Little Children are Sacred(Wild & Anderson 2007) • Gambling mentioned 36 times and in all instances except one, in the same sentence as alcohol, drug abuse and pornography • Closing the Gap on Indigenous disadvantage: A Generational Plan of Action(NTG, 2008) • A belated NT government response

  3. Recommendations and Responses

  4. Scholars divided:Positive and Negative Impacts • Late 70’s to early 80’s seen as relatively benign activity (unregulated) • e.g. distributes income and social/fun activity, equated with hunting and gathering (Altman 1985, Goodale 1987) • Other social/medical researchers tended to emphasise the negative impacts • Impacts on child nutrition, financial stress & increased family tensions (Hunter 1993, Hunter and Spargo 1988, Brady 2004) • Association with other community contexts e.g. alcohol/drug abuse (McKnight 2002)

  5. Gambling as a political concern • It is common to see gambling lumped with other social “vices” in government policy and research • Public health/harm minimisation verse associated gambling related problems within the sphere of the individual • Different policy approaches across jurisdictions (>40 codes of practice) • Limited regulatory government intervention & proactive positioning of industry are central regulatory principle in the NT • Codes limited by resource constraints (Fogarty and Young 2008)

  6. A public health approach • Examples: alcohol, pornography, crime (community safety), tobacco • Laws to limit access to certain available goods and services (e.g. drinking restrictions, TV/movies /literature classifications, fines etc.) • An informed public health approach requires an evidence base

  7. National Definition of Problem Gambling Problem gambling is characterised by difficulties limiting money and/or time spent on gambling, which leads to adverse consequences for the gambler, others or the community. (Neale et al. 2005)

  8. Is gambling problematic now? • Early 90’s increasing patronage of casino – indications of gambling phases (Foote 1996) • Card playing viewed by Aboriginal people as positive (social, distributive), but tended to view pokies as problematic (McMillian and Togni 2000) • Problem gambling 2-3 times higher based on two estimates (SOGS: 4.0% v. 1.9%; CPGI: 7.9% v. 2.5%) (SSPR 2006, Young et al. 2007) • Indigenous more likely to be monthly poker machine players (47% cf. 33%) • Variation between communities in attitudes to gambling including cards (McDonald and Wombo 2006)

  9. NEGATIVE LIFE EVENTS SCALE2002 NATSISS and GSS • Gambling problems • Alcohol or drug related problems • Witness to violence • Abuse or violent crime • Trouble with the police • Divorce or separation • Not able to get a job • Lost job, made redundant, sacked • Death of family member or close friend • Serious illness or disability • Serious accident

  10. 2002 Reported gambling problems

  11. Aims • What is the relationship between gambling problems and other items in the Negative Life Events Scale (NLES)? • What are the demographic, socioeconomic and socio-cultural correlates of reported gambling problems in the NT?

  12. Methods • Australian Bureau of Statistics data • 2002 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey (NATSISS) • 2002 General Social Survey (GSS) • Factor Analysis of NLES items • Logistic regression used to assess adjusted associations between gambling problems and demographic, socio-economic, socio-cultural and other explanatory variables

  13. Results: NT NLES Factor Analysis x = Loadings greater than 0.50; o = Loading greater than 0.40

  14. NATSISS: Significant multivariate adjusted correlates of gambling problems: Figure 1

  15. NATSISS: Significant multivariate adjusted correlates of gambling problems: Figure 2

  16. GSS: Significant multivariate adjusted correlates of gambling problems: Figure 1

  17. Comparison of NATSISS & GSS • Identify any differential associations between Indigenous and general population analysis • Variables with same directional association • Cash flow problems • Participation in social/recreational activities • Victim of threatened of physical violence • Variables with different directional association • Household income and source of income • Self-assessed health

  18. Caveats to the analysis • Different scope between the GSS and NATSISS (non-remote v. all NT) • Estimates biased up in discrete community sample because of greater social connectedness  skin groups • Confounding through unmeasured variables (e.g. community size/location)

  19. Key messages • Broader social context important • Structural factors such as housing shortages • Gambling problems do situate with other public health concerns such as: • alcohol and drug abuse, and • Crime and law and order issues • Differences in associations between Indigenous and non-Indigenous population targeted policy

  20. Concluding comments • NTG response to gambling in communities located the problem predominantly with individuals • Gambling counselling expansion, education • Clearly gambling is interconnected with a range of social and structural contexts & placing gambling in isolation in policy is unlikely to have much effect on negative aspects of gambling • Programs addressing the structural influences are more likely to influence the negative aspects of gambling, particularly in remote communities

  21. Thank you • Questions

More Related