1 / 32

Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia PA: a pilot intervention project

This project aims to assess and improve colorectal cancer screening rates in Appalachian Pennsylvania through academic detailing and tailored interventions.

lferreira
Download Presentation

Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia PA: a pilot intervention project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia PA: a pilot intervention project William Curry, MD, MS Dept of Family & Community Medicine M.S.Hershey Medical Center 7 MAY 2008

  2. Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia PA: a pilot intervention project Mark Dignan, PhD Gene Lengerich, PhD Alan Adelman, MD, MS Brenda Kluhsman, MS Marie Graybill, BSN

  3. Colorectal Cancer • Second leading cause of cancer deaths • 150,000 new cases annually • 57,000 annual deaths • In Pennsylvania • 8,200 new cases annually • Rates decreasing except in black males • 75/100,000 black males, 49/100,000 white females • 3,000 annual deaths • 26/100,000 males, 18/100,000 females

  4. Pennsylvania Counties Participating Practices Hershey Medical Center

  5. Burden of Disease • Union County • 130 cases per year • 20% more cases in males than expected • 32 deaths per year • 18/100,000 males, 12/100,000 females • Northumberland County • 190 cases per year • 20% more cases in males than expected • 163 deaths per year • 30/100,000 males, 19/100,000 females

  6. Burden of Disease • Centre County • 271 cases per year • 7% fewer cases in males than expected • 93 deaths per year • 20/100,000 males, 14/100,000 females • Snyder • 137 cases per year • 32% more cases in females than expected • 38 deaths per year • 19/100,000 males, 17/100,000 females

  7. Colorectal Cancer Screening • Screening of population is less than optimal • 53% in US • 49% in PA • 44% in Appalachian PA Only 32% of colorectal cancers are found at local stage in rural Appalachia.

  8. ACS CRC Screening Guidelines • Fecal occult blood test (FOBT)* • or fecal immunochemical test (FIT)* every year** *For FOBT or FIT, the take-home multiple sample method should be used. **Colonoscopy should be done if the FOBT or FIT shows blood in the stool

  9. ACS CRC Screening Guidelines • Flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years** **Colonoscopy should be done if sigmoidoscopy results show a polyp

  10. ACS CRC Screening Guidelines • an FOBT* or FIT* every year plus flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years** (Of these first 3 options, the combination of FOBT or FIT every year plus flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years is preferable.) **Colonoscopy should be done if the FOBT or FIT shows blood in the stool or sigmoidoscopy results show a polyp

  11. ACS CRC Screening Guidelines • Double-contrast barium enema every 5 years** **Colonoscopy should be done if DCBE shows a polyp

  12. ACS CRC Screening Guidelines • Colonoscopy every 10 years ** **If possible, polyps should be removed during the colonoscopy.

  13. ACS CRC Screening Guidelines • Other alternatives • Stool DNA • CT Colonography (virtual colonoscopy)

  14. Colorectal Cancer Screening • Interventions • Audit & Feedback • CME • Provider reminders • Despite these efforts, CRC screening rates remain lower than breast, cervical and prostate cancer screenings.

  15. Colorectal Cancer Screening • Academic Detailing • One-on-One interaction between provider and trained educator • Interactive information presentation • Evidence for Academic Detailing? • Reduced inappropriate and over-prescribing • Tobacco cessation • Improved rural diabetes care • Increased mammography use • Decreased inappropriate PSA ordering

  16. Colorectal Cancer Screening • Academic Detailing • One study that showed improved follow-up of positive FOBT1 • Mixed evidence about effectiveness with CRC screening • Physician recommendation is an important factor in patient willingness to be screened

  17. Colorectal Cancer Screening • Study Design • Baseline Provider Survey • Screening practices • Follow-up practices • Referral patterns • Practice Assessment • Key informant interviews • Assess current screening practices

  18. Colorectal Cancer Screening • Study Design • Medical Record Abstraction • Patients 50 and older • Seen in practice in the previous 2 months • Estimate number of patients offered screening and who had screening completed • Exclusion criteria • History of colon cancer, polyps • Symptoms of colon cancer • Acute visit

  19. Colorectal Cancer Screening • Study Design • Academic Detailing • Visit 1 – Lunch and Learn • Visit 2 & 3 – Tailored intervention based on practice assessment and Visit 1 • Visit 4 – Follow-up and final physician assessment • Post-intervention Provider survey • Post-intervention medical record abstraction

  20. Colorectal Cancer Screening • Study Design • Post-intervention Key-informant interviews • Qualitative assessment

  21. Colorectal Cancer Screening • Data Collection with caBIG • Working with Univ of Minnesota, capturing chart abstraction via web to NCI database • caBIG™ Goal: To create a virtual web of interconnected data, individuals, and organizations redefining how research is conducted, care is provided, and patients/ participants interact with the biomedical research enterprise • CDEs - Completed • Output is an Excel datafile to research team

  22. Results • Four practices • Initial 3 visits completed • Initial provider surveys collected • Record review • 280 patient records abstracted • 105 entered into CaBIG • 64 completed • Initial Datafile returned from CaBIG • 45% screening rate (preliminary) • Patient factors • Physician/system factors

  23. Lunch and Learn Lessons • Providers and staff engaged • Each practice has different outlook • Wall Charts • Handouts • Engaging staff • Story telling • Want information on their performance

  24. Acknowledgements • National Cancer Institute • ACTION Health • The four practice sites • Research Team

  25. References • Myers RE , Turner B , Weinberg D , et al. Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening Preventive Medicine, 2004 ;38(4):375-381 • Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Gurwitz JH, Guadagnoli E, Hauptman PJ, Borbas C, et al. Effect of local medical opinion leaders on quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998;279(17):1358-63.

  26. References • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Colon Cancer Screening. 2008. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ColorectalCancerScreening. Accessed January 31, 2008. • American Cancer Society. Detailed Guide: Colon and Rectum Cancer. 2008. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/CRI_2_3x.asp?dt=10.

  27. Colorectal Cancer Screening Questions?

More Related