1 / 40

Wellness Promotion/Prevention: Overcoming Legal And Compliance Hurdles

Wellness Promotion/Prevention: Overcoming Legal And Compliance Hurdles . John R. Hickman, Esq. Alston & Bird, LLP John.Hickman@alston.com. Reasons to Consider Wellness Programs. Rising Healthcare Costs :

libitha
Download Presentation

Wellness Promotion/Prevention: Overcoming Legal And Compliance Hurdles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Wellness Promotion/Prevention: Overcoming Legal And Compliance Hurdles John R. Hickman, Esq. Alston & Bird, LLP John.Hickman@alston.com

  2. Reasons to Consider Wellness Programs • Rising Healthcare Costs: • Premiums for employer-based health insurance rose by 9.2 percent in 2005 -- The fifth consecutive year of increases over 9 percent. • Since 2000, employment-based health insurance premiums have increased 73 percent (inflation only 14%; wage growth only 15%). • The average employee contribution to company-provided health insurance plan has increased more than 143 percent since 2000. • The annual premiums for family coverage have now eclipsed the gross earnings for a full-time, minimum-wage worker ($10,712).

  3. Reasons to Consider Wellness Programs • Poor Employee Health: • Obesity: In 2005, 60.5% of adults in the United States were overweight, 23.9% were obese, and 3.0% were extremely obese. • Smoking: 24% of adult males smoke; 19% of females smoke. Each year in the United States, approximately 440,000 persons die of a cigarette smoking-attributable illness, resulting in 5.6 million years of potential life lost, $75 billion in direct medical costs, and $82 billion in lost productivity.

  4. 2008 PWC Study • $500 billion annually spent (25% of total medical expenditures) due to “behavioral habits” • Obesity 200B • Smoking 191B • Alcohol >2B • Non-adherence 100B

  5. Disease Management vs. EmployeeWellness Programs • Wellness Programs: Designed to improve general health of overall employee population before employees get sick. • Example: Weight Watchers • Disease Management Programs: Designed to improve health of particular employees after they have developed chronic health conditions (e.g., asthma, diabetes, heart condition, hypertension, renal disease). • Example: Health coach to advise about options

  6. Health Risk Assessments • Health Risk Assessment: Series of medical and health-related questions aimed at obtaining “baseline” information about employees’ overall health to identify persons with chronic conditions or who are at risk for developing a condition.

  7. Compliance Issues • Practical and legal compliance issues may arise with Disease Management and Wellness Programs under . . . • HIPAA Nondiscrimination Requirements • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) • Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) • Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) • HIPAA Administrative Simplification (Privacy, EDI, and Security) • COBRA • ERISA • Income Tax • Plan Design/Integration Issues (e.g., HRAs and HSAs) • State law

  8. Carrots and Sticks • Two Competing Approaches: • Carrot: • Health club memberships • Reduced health care premiums • Smoking cessation programs • Weight loss programs • Free health examinations • Healthy eating programs • Stress reduction programs • Stick: • Refusal to hire • Disqualification from health care plan • Termination

  9. HIPAA Implications for Wellness Programs • Generally cannot vary benefit based on health status . . . but variation allowed for certain wellness programs • Rule does not apply to programs that do not condition benefit on ability to meet health standard (i.e., a “Participation Based Wellness Program” – e.g: • Incentives to participate in testing (regardless of outcome) • Waiver of co-payment/deductible if participate in pre-natal program • Reimbursement of health club membership • Reimbursements for smoking cessation or weight reduction programs (regardless of outcome) • Compensation to fill out health risk assessment

  10. Requirements for “Standard Based” Wellness Programs • Any program that provides a “reward/penalty” based on the ability to meet a health standard must: • Limit reward/penalty to specified percentage 20 % • Be reasonably designed to promote health or prevent disease • Annual qualification requirement • Must be available to all similarly situated participants -- i.e., individually tailored adjustments to program may be required for individuals who cannot meet health standard • Notice of individual accommodations must be provided

  11. Requirements for “Standard Based” Wellness Programs • Example: Bonus for cholesterol levels below 200 must include notice allowing those medically unable to comply to discuss alternatives; • Example: Bonus for body mass index might allow for qualification based on walking 20 minutes three times a week; • Example: Bonus for “tobacco-free” employees might allow for qualification based on enrollment in smoking cessation program (Note: assumption that tobacco use addiction is a medical condition -- nicotine addiction)

  12. Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) • ADEA prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals on the basis of age with regard to employment and the privileges of employment (e.g., benefits) • Generally can’t reduce or terminate benefits due to age • May reduce benefits based on equal cost/equal benefit rule • Recent case (Erie) has indicated that the ADEA applies to retirees • Erie prevents employers from reducing benefits of retirees (e.g., at Medicare age) unless plan meets equal cost/equal benefit rule • Does not require employer to offer retiree benefits • ADEA impacts both • The ability to stop DM/Wellness program incentives /surcharges upon reaching a particular age and • Varying incentives/surcharge due to age • Imposing additional requirements for incentive based on age

  13. HIPAA Administrative Simplification • Are disease management, wellness programs subject to HIPAA Privacy/Security/EDI? • Only if • The DM/Wellness is part of a “Health Plan” or • The DM/Wellness vendor is a “Health Care Provider” • Most argue that DM/Wellness is part of a “health plan” • Facilitates information sharing with health care providers without authorization and marketing concerns • Enables VEBA/Trust funding

  14. HIPAA Privacy • In a nutshell . . . . • Covered entities are prohibited from using protected health information (PHI) without an authorization for any reason other than treatment, payment, or related health care operations. Specific authorization is required for any other use. • For example, use of PHI for “marketing” requires authorization • Be wary of PHI leakage outside of health plan

  15. HIPAA Privacy • In a nutshell . . . • Covered entities required to establish procedures to protect electronic PHI • Covered entities subject to EDI requirements if engaging in certain electronic transactions • Business associates (e.g., TPAs or “Vendors”) subject many of the same requirements via contract (the “Business Associate Agreement”)

  16. COBRA • Most “group health plans” are required to provide COBRA continuation coverage to qualified beneficiaries if coverage is lost as a result of certain qualifying events • “Group health plan” means a plan that provides “medical care” and is maintained by the employer • Will DM/Wellness programs provided by the employer be subject to COBRA? • If they provide “medical care” • General health not medical care

  17. COBRA • COBRA considerations: • Is Medical care offered? • What type of incentive is offered? • Impact of cash incentives/premium reductions? • Impact of HRA/HSA incentives? • Part of overall health program or stand alone arrangement? • Participation limited to plan participants or all employees? • What benefit must be provided? • What is cost of program?

  18. Tax Issues • Tax issues arise when • Employer pays for coverage that does not constitute “medical care” • General health and wellness programs • Weight reduction programs not limited to obesity • Membership in a gym • If not for medical care, the value of such programs must generally be included in gross income and subject to withholding?

  19. Tax Issues • Non-health incentives raise tax issues • Cash payments • Taxable and subject to withholding • Gift certificates • Likely taxable and subject to withholding • If paid through VEBA, could be a disqualified benefit • De minimis exception

  20. Tax Issues • Health related incentives • E.g., contribution to HRA or HSA or Health FSA • Generally non-taxable if health plan related • No tax exclusion for self-employed individuals • Health FSA • Possible change of election issues • Potentials for health benefit restricted debit card • HSA • Must be structured to be made “through the cafeteria plan”

  21. State Law • Statutory Restrictions: • Smokers’ Rights: 20 states, including Arizona, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Missouri, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming • Example: “An employer may not … require as a condition of employment, an employee or prospective employee to refrain from using; or … discriminate against an employee with respect to the employee’s compensation and benefits or terms and conditions of employment based on the employee’s use of tobacco products outside the course of the employee’s or prospective employee’s employment.” Ind. Stat. 22-5-4-1

  22. State Law • Statutory Restrictions: • Lawful Conduct / Lawful Products: 11 states, including California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin. • NY Example: “It shall be unlawful for any employer or employment agency to refuse to hire, employ or license, or to discharge from employment or otherwise discriminate against an individual in compensation, promotion or terms, conditions or privileges of employment because of: … an individual’s legal use of consumable products prior to the beginning or after the conclusion of the employee’s work hours, and off the employer’s premises and without the use of the employer’s equipment or other property.

  23. State Law • Common Law Tort Claims • Wrongful Discharge in Violation of Public Policy • Invasion of Privacy / Intrusion into Seclusion • Example: • Rodrigues v. The Scotts Company (Mass. Sup Ct.) • Facts: • Hired as lawn technician. • Never smoked on the job; only off the job. • Fired for drug screen that was positive for nicotine. • Law: • No statutory provision in Massachusetts • Violation of Right to Privacy • Unreasonable Search of his Person

  24. State Law • Thoughts/Conclusions: • Patchwork Effect – Practical Limitations • Legal compliance issues for national employers • Fairness issues for employees in different states • Administrative costs/burdens • Future Developments • More and more action from state legislatures • Lobbying by American Civil Liberties Union

  25. Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) • Americans With Disabilities Act • Coverage: 15 or more employees • Substantive Provisions: • Non-discrimination / Accommodation • Restrictions on Medical Examinations • Confidentiality of Medical Information

  26. Americans With Disabilities Act • Non-Discrimination/Accommodation • Provisions only apply to “disabled” individuals • Definition: Physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. • Most behaviors targeted by wellness programs do not rise to the level of a “disability” under the ADA • Smoking – No • Weight – Maybe • Alcohol Consumption – Yes • Beware: “Regarded As” Disabled Claims

  27. Americans With Disabilities Act • Non-Discrimination (cont’d): • Disparate Impact Claims: “Using qualification standards, employment tests or other selection criteria that tend to screen out an individual with a disability or a class of individuals with disabilities unless the standard, test or other selection criteria … is shown to be job-related for the position in question and is consistent with business necessity.”

  28. Americans With Disabilities Act • Medical Examinations and Inquiries: • Exams: ADA restricts manner and method of administering “medical exams” to both applicants and employees. • Medical Exams: Vision tests, blood, urine and breath analysis; blood pressure/cholesterol screens; x-rays • Questions: ADA also restricts asking “disability-related” questions of applicants and employees • Disability-Related Question: Any question likely to elicit information about a disability.

  29. Americans With Disabilities Act • Medical Examinations • Broad Coverage: • Rules apply to both applicants and employees. • Rules apply to both disabled and non-disabled. • Consequently, anyone can sue you. • Common Liability Scenarios: • Health Risk Assessments • Policing mechanisms for wellness programs

  30. Americans With Disabilities Act • Rules for Medical Examinations and Inquiries: • Applicants: • Pre-Offer: No examinations or inquiries allowed • Post-Offer: Examinations permitted, but must apply to all employees. • Employees: Must be “job-related and consistent with business necessity.” • Applies to all employees (whether disabled or not). • “Job-related” = Ability to perform essential job functions

  31. Americans With Disabilities Act • Voluntary Wellness Program Exception: • Statute: “A covered entity may conduct voluntary medical examinations, including voluntary medical histories, which are part of an employee health program available to employees at that work site.” • Regulation: EEOC has not promulgated any regulation about meaning of “voluntary.” • Enforcement Guidance: “Voluntary” means no penalty can be imposed for not participating; anything other than “de minimis” incentive is prohibited.

  32. Americans With Disabilities Act • Confidentiality Requirements: • Rule: Information regarding the medical condition or history of applicants/employees must be: • “collected and maintained on separate forms”; and • “in separate medical files” • Exceptions to Confidentiality: • Managers may be informed of restrictions/accommodations; • First aid and safety personnel for emergency purposes; • Government officials investigating ADA compliance.

  33. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)

  34. How does GINA impact health plans generally? • Effective first plan year after May 21, 2009. • GINA amends the HIPAA nondiscrimination rules to restrict the access and use of genetic information by group health plans and group health insurers, including non-federal governmental plans. • GINA also imposes similar restrictions on insurers in the individual market and issuers of Medigap policies with corresponding amendments to the PHSA and the Social Security Act.

  35. What is “Genetic Information”? • “Genetic information” with respect to any individual means information about: • an individual's “genetic tests”; • the “genetic tests” of “family members” of such individual; • the manifestation of a disease or disorder in the individual’s family members. • Genetic test means “an analysis of human DNA, RNA, chromosomes, proteins, or metabolites that detects genotypes, mutations, or chromosomal changes.” . • The term “family members” means the individual’s dependents under the group health plan, as well as any first-, second-, third- or fourth-degree relative of the dependent or the individual.

  36. What are the group health plan limitations under GINA? • Generally, GINA imposes the following limitations on all group health plans and group health insurers: • Adjusting premiums/contributions: Plans and insurers may not adjust the premium or contribution amounts for the group on the basis of genetic information. However, the premium or contribution amount for a group may take into consideration the manifestation of a disease of an individual who is enrolled in the plan so long as this information is not used as genetic information about other group members (e.g., a covered dependent) and to further increase the premium for the employer. • Requesting Genetic Tests: Plans and insurers may not request or require an individual or a family member to undergo a genetic test. However, a plan may obtain and use the results of a genetic test as necessary to fulfill its payment obligations under the plan so long as it only requests the minimum amount of information necessary to make payment.

  37. Prohibited Uses of Genetic Information • Requesting Genetic Information for Underwriting: Plans or insurers may not request, require, or purchase genetic information for “underwriting purposes.” For purposes of GINA, “underwriting purposes” means • Rules for, or determination of, eligibility for benefits under the plan or coverage; • The computation of premium or contribution amounts under the plan or coverage; • The application of any pre-existing conditions exclusion under the plan or coverage; • Other activities related to the creation, renewal, or replacement of a contract of health insurance or health benefits. • Obtaining genetic information prior to enrollment: Plans or insurers may not request, require, or purchase an individual’s genetic information prior to such individual’s enrollment in the plan.

  38. What is the practical impact on group health plans? • Plans/insurers cannot request or require any person to undergo a genetic test. Genetic test results may be accessed by plans/insurers, but only for payment purposes (and the request must be for the minimum necessary for the purpose). • Generally, GINA does not altogether prohibit plans/insurers from requesting an individual to provide “genetic information” (which may include history of disease/disorder in family members). However, plans/insurers must not: • request, require or purchase genetic information for underwriting purposes; • request, require or purchase an individual’s genetic information prior to the individual’s enrollment in the plan (except for incidental collection of genetic information); or • require that an enrolled individual provide genetic information, unless it is for certain research purposes (subject to the conditions described above). • Plans/insurers cannot take genetic information into account in setting group premium or group contribution amounts (but they can adjust premiums and contributions based on actual claims experience).

  39. How does GINA change HIPAA’s privacy rules? • GINA requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to revise the HIPAA privacy regulation so that: • “Genetic information” is clearly considered health information subject to HIPAA privacy protection; and • The use or disclosure of genetic information (other than incidental use or disclosure) about an individual for underwriting purposes would not be permitted use or disclosure.

  40. Question & Answer

More Related