1 / 19

Glass Phenomenology from the connection to spin glasses: review and ideas

Glass Phenomenology from the connection to spin glasses: review and ideas. Nussinov Washington University. Conclusions (Moore). Mapping between glass to spin glass in a magnetic field. Magnetic field corresponds to non-linearities. Conclusions continued (Moore).

lila-bright
Download Presentation

Glass Phenomenology from the connection to spin glasses: review and ideas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Glass Phenomenology from the connection to spin glasses: review and ideas Nussinov Washington University

  2. Conclusions (Moore) • Mapping between glass to spin glass in a magnetic field Magnetic field corresponds to non-linearities.

  3. Conclusions continued (Moore) This mapping qualitatively accounts for (1) Seemingly divergent time scales (VFT) (2) Kauzmann crisis (3) stretched exponential (4) Increasing length scale

  4. More general idea/question: Is there a general framework that includes spin-glass/RFOT (random field ferromagnet) /locally preferred structures (“icosahedrics”)/constrained dynamics/MCT/ many other approaches and facets as special cases? Defects as generalized spins (or other non spin type degrees of freedom in a spin glass type action)? RFOT on its own is remarkably potent and includes many ideas as subcases.

  5. Outline 1. Qualitative success of simplest spin glass model (one dimensional Edwards Anderson model with field) in accounting for seminal glass features (Tarzia and Moore) 2. Non-orthogonality of local structure approaches to RFOT (approaches complimentary) 3. Possible interpretation of “spins” as local defects. 4. General question based on symmetry grounds

  6. One dimensional Edwards Anderson in a field

  7. Ising spin glass in a field. Spin glass and divergent correlation length only in zero field. Spin glass transition is avoided for finite fields.

  8. Microcrystalline order Several glass forming systems poised close to microcrystalline phases. E.g., several metallic glasses. Local structure as well as entropic considerations may be important.

  9. “Icosahedratics”- coexisting local energetics (and avoided transition) and entropic droplet arguments.Ideal packing in a Lennard-Jones Liquid

  10. We cannot keep going on forever • The ideal packing can, however, be extended over a substantial volume if we consider the surface of a sphere embedded in d=4 dimensions. • By endowing space with curvature we may remove the 7 degree void. (J. Sethna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2198 (1983))

  11. Landau-Ginzburg Expansion The theory: that of a system subjected to a non-Abelian background (magnetic field) (S. Sachdev & D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 32, 4592(1985))

  12. An exponential number of metastable states in the theory of icosahedral order Z. Nussinov (cond-mat/0209292, PRB), G. Tarjus et al. (cond-mat/0509127, JPCM) Extensive configurational entropy Glassy dynamics (Vogel-Fulcher) Physical origin: multitude of defect states against backdrop of geometrically incompatible locally preferred structures. Interaction between defects.

  13. Unusual Equilibrium Thermodynamics: Avoided Phase Transitions in icosahedral theory By performing a large n analysis (n=169 complex components in this theory) to second order in 1/n, deriving a generalized Mermin-Wagner theorem, and performing a thermal fluctuation analysis, we find that Z. Nussinov (cond-mat/0209292, PRB), G. Tarjus et al. (cond-mat/0509127, JPCM) The thermodynamic phase transition is avoided!

  14. Tc(κ=0) T Tc(κ≠0) κ The generic phase diagram • For any finite curvature, the system is hot. • Why is there no phase transition? • The huge degeneracy and near degeneracy of the system makes it very susceptible to thermal fluctuations. • All of this is true for all non-abelian fields. • Avoided transition due to field Similar to spin glass in field.

  15. Possible intuitive cause for spin glass behavior: Elastic strains generated by other defects act on a given defect. If all motion is nearly frozen then to compute the leading order dynamics, we may regard the external defects as quenched when computing the elastic interactions. General long range interactions change phase.

  16. Defects spoiling locally preferred structures Simplest defects: Two level tunneling systems/ Tunneling rotation impurities We can envision defect modes against the backdrop of preferred structures (e.g., P. Harrowell’s and others). Integrating out phonons assuming general crystalline like environment [Schechter and Stamp, arxiv:0801.4944] obtained for two level defects. Generalizations to tunneling entities (Lubchenko and Wolynes)?

  17. Symmetry question for general quenched theories: Forget particular derivation. Most general symmetry allowed Hamiltonian density functional that breaks time reversal Allows for paramagnetic, ferromagnetic, and spin glass Phases. Includes replicas for quenched quantities. When no long length scales/very low frequency modes present, all degrees of freedom must be present (as above).

More Related