1 / 15

Compliance Benchmarks

Compliance Benchmarks. EMSPIRE 2013. Compliance Performance Indicators (CPIs). EMS Insider – April, 2013 Page, Wolfberg, Wirth (PWW) National EMS Industry Law Firm Compliance Benchmarks Compliance Performance Indicators (CPIs). EMS|MC.

lily
Download Presentation

Compliance Benchmarks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Compliance Benchmarks EMSPIRE 2013

  2. Compliance Performance Indicators (CPIs) • EMS Insider – April, 2013 • Page, Wolfberg, Wirth (PWW) • National EMS Industry Law Firm • Compliance Benchmarks • Compliance Performance Indicators (CPIs)

  3. EMS|MC As your third party billing agency, how do we measure up to these Compliance Benchmarks/Compliance Performance Indicators (CPI)?

  4. Service Mix • Service Levels: • BLS, Non-Emergency • BLS, Emergency • ALS, Non-Emergency • ALS, Emergency • ALS2 • Specialty Care Transport

  5. Service Mix • Monitoring of Service Mix Percentages • Identify High % of ALS Calls • Identify High % of Repetitive Patients • CMS National Statistics: • 67% ALS • 33% BLS • EMS|MC Statistics*: • 61.4% ALS • 38.6% BLS *CY 2012 Data – as of 05/28/2013

  6. Service Mix • Why is it important to review service mix? • Medicare Contractors review this information. • Comparative Billing Reports (CBR) recent mailed to providers that ranked higher than their peers. • EMS Industry standards were not taken into consideration (i.e. EMS/911 services paired with Private Non-Emergency) • OIG Work Plan – Comparative Billing Report for Non-Emergency and Repetitive Patients • Qui Tam/Whistleblower Audits • Several False Claims Act Investigations Nationwide

  7. Service Mix • Risk Factors • BLS - Non-Emergency • Medical Necessity • Physician Certification Statements • Repetitive Patients • ALS - Emergency • ALS Assessment – Written Policy • Standard Dispatch Protocols • ALS Interventions

  8. Payer Mix • Payer Categories: • Medicare • Medicaid • Commercial Insurers (includes TPL, Facilities) • Private Pay (Self Insured) • High Percentages of Self Pay • May indicate opportunities to capture insurance information or identify proper payment sources

  9. Payer Mix • Identify Benchmarks and Trend Analysis • Healthcare Reform • Healthcare Exchanges • Medicaid Eligibility Expansion • Economy • EMS|MC Statistics*: • Medicare 39.3% • Medicaid 10.0% • Insurance 28.9% • Patient 21.6%

  10. Miscellaneous Metrics • Credit Balances • Federal False Claims Act • Governmental Payers • 60 days from date identified • Denied Claims • Benchmarking can identify potential problems with documentation, or payer specific issues.

  11. Claims Billed for Denial • Percentage of Claims Billed as Non-Covered Services • Medicare expects a submitted claim meets all of the requirements for coverage. • Modifier GY indicates the claim is billed for denial purposes only. • “if non-covered modifiers are used too sparingly, it may indicate that Medicare is being improperly billed for payment.” Doug Wolfberg, PWW

  12. Claims Billed for Denial • Recent Federal Fraud Cases • False Claims includes submission of claim for services that did not meet the medical necessity requirements. • Providers must assure the medical necessity requirements are met prior to submitting a claim seeking reimbursement for the service.

  13. Patient Signatures • Medicare Patient Signature Requirements • Patient’s Signature • Authorized Representative • Crew and Receiving Facility Signature • Attestation that Patient was unable to sign and reason why • Patient Invoice Cycle • Allows patient to provide valid signature prior to submitting claim • Further collection efforts when patient does not comply

  14. Final Caveat • Recognize certain metrics may appear positive but may be masking other problems. • For example, a 45% Collection Rate by Third Party Collection Agency • May indicate Front End Processing may be sending claims to collection agency prematurely • EMS|MC Statistics: • Average 8-12% Collection Rate with Collection Agency and Debt Setoff Programs

  15. EMS|MC Metrics • Daily Management Review • Quarterly Compliance Review • Revenue Billed • Revenue Received • Quality Assurance • Claims Inventory • Denials Inventory • Claims Transmission • Customer Service Matrix • Service Mix • Repetitive Patients • Refunds • Claims Billed for Denial • Signature Requirements • Fractional Mileage

More Related