Setting smart SMART Goals Daniel Hayden Internal Discussion October 2010. Objectives. Understand what are SMART Goals Understand 3 Issues When Determining SMART Goals Understand what other issues you should consider. What Are SMART Goals.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Specific - create a clear picture of what you want to do
Measureable – how will you know it is a success
Action Oriented – indicates what needs to be achieved
Realistic(1)– can be done given scope, time, resources
Timebound – must define when the goal will be accomplished
Name at least three threats that wetlands in the Bahamas face?
By June 2010, 80% of the local farmers at 4 targeted villages (Aek Nabara, Janji Manaon, Sugi Julu, Sugi Jae) will agree that opening
new agriculture/farming land in the forest should be stopped and not allowed (an increase from 64.3%)
At the end of the campaign period, supporting the awakening at least one initiative making land use in one village from the nearest village four regions (Merapun, Sido Bangen, Lesan Dayak and Muara Assistant), thus reducing pressure on Virgin River Protected Area due to land conversion.
Have major cleanup events at both the HWPNP and Bone fish pond by May 2009.
It is Art
It is Science
The Future is Uncertain We understand the past
People are unique People are predictable
Results vary by context Patterns Exist
The Science can guide the direction of the results, but the art guides the degree of the results
If you follow a compass to the North Pole you will be between 200 to 1200 miles from your goal. This is terrible if you start in Canada, not so bad from Australia.
It is easier to change knowledge and generate conversations than to change attitudes and behaviors.
If the community has generally poor attitudes, it is harder to make change, and full adoption can be hard
According to Diffusions of Innovation the Rate of Change Depends on the Starting Point
Laggards – 16%
The Late Majority – 34%
Early Adopters – 13.5%
The Early Majority – 34%
Innovators – 2.5%
Source: Everett Rogers, graph from Wikipedia.org
Selective perception (Hassinger) plays a role – people who don’t “want” to know somehow don’t seem to learn.