E N D
1. NETWARCOM Transformation AFCEA Presentation
14 MAR 06
Mr. Mark Honecker
Deputy Commander,
Naval Network Warfare Command
2.
3.
4. CFFC's Force Providers
5. NETWARCOM Role Navys Type Commander for
Man, Train, and Equip
The network is the platform
Global C4I
Naval Networks
Information Operations
FORCEnet
6. NETWARCOM FY06 Command Profile
7. NETWARCOM
8. NETWARCOMFocus Operate the Navy component of the Global Information Grid (GIG) as a weapons system
Result: Determine and meet negotiated service level agreements with maritime headquarters and other supported commands (both afloat and ashore).
Restriction(s): Do not violate IA and interoperability standards
Extend Use of Information Operations (IO) Capabilities
Result: Increase the breadth and depth of Commanders use of IO as reflected in incorporation of IO in deliberate and crisis action planning, exercises, and current operations as measured by maturity model.
Restriction(s): Ensure acceptable levels of support to National missions are maintained.
Assure Naval equities in space
Result: Increase Naval commanders warfighting capabilities through the use of cumulative space effects in maritime operations as measured by maturity model.
Restriction(s): Ensure no unnecessary redundancy of effort between other DoD Space communities and NETWARCOMs role as the Naval operational agent for Space.
9. Develop the workforce to achieve information superiority
Result: Sustain, attract and develop a qualified/certified, diverse workforce to meet mission requirements as measured by ratings from recipient organizations, achieving ratings of meet requirements or exceed requirements for personnel within information domain.
Restriction(s): Cannot receive rating of fails to meet requirements from any customer.
Ensure billets are coded/characterized correctly to meet actual requirements.
Implement FORCEnet
Result: Deliver and attain Navy and Joint acceptance of the FORCEnet Implementation and Governance Plan that integrates concepts, capabilities, architecture, and assessments
Restriction(s): Compliant with JCIDS (DOTMLPF) process. Informed by Naval, Joint, and Coalition reqmts.
Shape development and operation of Maritime Operations Center
Result: Drive development of and achieve acceptance from Navy and Joint stakeholders on CONOPS, organization, processes, technology and systems for the maritime operations centers.
Restriction(s): Maintain synchronization with Joint C2 initiatives, directives and policies. Ensure CONOPS includes NETWARCOMs roles as a supported.supporting commander. NETWARCOMFocus cont DOTMLPF Doctrines, Organization, Training, Material, Leadership and Education, Personnel and FacilitiesDOTMLPF Doctrines, Organization, Training, Material, Leadership and Education, Personnel and Facilities
10. Navy NetworksCritical Actions Lock-down legacy networks
Collapse legacy enclaves
Accelerate cut-over to centrally managed enclaves
NMCI; ONE-NET
Eliminate DISA-direct connections
Recover DISA connectivity charges; reclaim bandwidth
Executing Cyber-warfighting Campaign
JOPES based approach
CYBER Condition ZEBRA
HREN, TBEN, NOLA & RITSC SW lock-downs complete
PAC NW, Hawaii and D.C. to follow
NETWARCOM OPORD directs that ALL applications must be Security Technical Implementation Guide (STIG) and Unclassified Trusted Network Protect (UTN-P) compliant
11.
12. Space Effects
13. FORCEnet is
Revolutionized Naval command & control**
FORCEnet will transform
Organizations
Processes
Doctrine
Technology
Investments
Reduces the Navy Networks from
hundreds to 3 seamless networks:
IT-21
NMCI
ONE-NET
Navy Component of the GIG
14. Networks are a MHQ weapons system
Doctrine in development for core MHQ processes and activities
Reachback
Information to the extremities
C2 approach
Horizontal and vertical interoperability
15. The New NETWARCOM Providing the full spectrum of NETWORK Centric Operations and Warfare
Enhancing our leaders decision cycle
Controlling our enemys
Influencing many
16. Backup
17. NETWARCOM Organization