1 / 16

Emerging Issues and Outreach

Emerging Issues and Outreach. Gary Hannaford, Chair, Emerging Issues and Outreach Committee IESBA Meeting New York, USA April 7-9, 2014. Background. Emerging Issues & Outreach (EIO) December 2013 – EIO working processes finalized and EIO Committee (EIOC) established

liza
Download Presentation

Emerging Issues and Outreach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emerging Issues and Outreach Gary Hannaford, Chair, Emerging Issues and Outreach Committee IESBA Meeting New York, USA April 7-9, 2014

  2. Background • Emerging Issues & Outreach (EIO) • December 2013 – EIO working processes finalized and EIO Committee (EIOC) established • January 2014 – 1st EIOC teleconference. Issues considered: • MG Rover • Aggressive Tax Avoidance • EU Reform

  3. MG Rover Case • Considered in Dec. 2013 Exec. Session • Presented at March 2014 CAG • Tribunal report unclear on: • Circumstances in which accountants must consider the public interest • What it means to consider the public interest • What constitutes a PIE • How to document public interest considerations • Is additional guidance needed in the Code?

  4. MG Rover Case • CAG Comments: • Consider the totality of issue • Do non-accountants have to consider the public interest • Regulator could be setting a precedent which may warrant further attention • Consider the need for a better explanation of the public interest • Would the public interest have been considered if the transaction had been a success • Consider the political dimension • Would tribunal findings differed under the IESBA Code

  5. MG Rover Case • Matters for Consideration: • Specific actions re. definition of public interest • Public interest – only applicable to PIEs or all entities? • Other matters, e.g. revisiting definition of a PIE

  6. Aggressive Tax Avoidance • Multinational companies, often assisted by accountants, have exploited outdated tax laws and tax mitigation schemes to reduce tax costs • Strong statements from ICAEW and prominent politicians on role of accountants in assisting in aggressive tax avoidance and ignoring public interest concerns • G20 countries exchanging information to tighten loopholes

  7. Aggressive Tax Avoidance • CAG Comments: • European Commission has initiated group to consider tax issues • Could accountants be held liable if don’t provide client with the best tax advice • Advice is not illegal. Governments use tax as an incentive.

  8. Aggressive Tax Avoidance • Matters for Consideration: • Is specific action needed or is monitoring sufficient? • What would that specific action be?

  9. EU Audit Reform • Final vote on adoption in Q2 2014 • Translate in various EU languages and incorporate into official EU text by Q3 2014 • Members then have two years to adopt – i.e. Q3 2016 • Partner rotation - 7yr. Time-on and 3yr cooling-off • Firm rotation must be overlaid with this • UK has bifurcated rotation, but no mandatory firm rotation

  10. EU Audit Reform • At least 2 firms must tender • Recommendation from TCWG needed • Min engagement 1 yr. Members states can increase this • Max engagement 10 yrs. Member states can decrease this • Patchwork implementation between Members likely

  11. EU Audit Reform • Dec 2013, preliminary agreement on audit reform: • Mandatory rotation every 10 yrs. • Can extend tenure for 10 yrs. on tender-hence max 20 yrs. • Joint audits can extend for 14 years (hence max 24 yrs.) • Extraordinary circumstances can increase by a further 2 years (hence max 26 yrs.) • Implementation will be staggered

  12. EU Audit Reform • Rotation requirements for senior personnel, but no definition of senior personnel • Limit on NAS to 70% of audit fees over three years, but no guidance on how to calculate • Restrictions of permissible activities during cooling-off – no indicate in extent of restrictions • Prohibited services list. No leeway on prohibitions.

  13. EU Audit Reform / Other Developments • Matters for Consideration: • Are specific actions needed as relates to EU Audit Developments? • Other international developments for the EIOC to consider?

  14. Outreach • Increased dialogue with profession and other stakeholders • Commitment to dialogue with CAG member organizations • No immediate suggestions from CAG Reps on additional outreach opportunities

  15. Outreach • Matters for Consideration: • Comments in Outreach performed • Possible additional Outreach opportunities

More Related