1 / 9

To do and not to do in manuscript submission

To do and not to do in manuscript submission. Manuscript submission. Adapted slides courtesy of Elise Langdon-Neuner, Thomas Babor and Kerstin Stenius. Cover letter. Editors read the cover letter  Statements of manuscript submitted to one journal only and not previously published.

loc
Download Presentation

To do and not to do in manuscript submission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. To do and not to do in manuscript submission Manuscript submission Adapted slides courtesy of Elise Langdon-Neuner, Thomas Babor and Kerstin Stenius

  2. Cover letter • Editors read the cover letter  • Statements of manuscript submitted to one journal only and not previously published. • Your chance… • to highlight the importance of your study • to explain why manuscript of interest to journal

  3. Choosing a journal - Brainstorm What influences your choice of journal?

  4. Choosing a journal Coverage by indexing Open access Cost Journal’s prestige (Impact factor) Publication speed Readership

  5. Where are the instructions? Instructions for authors: journal webpage Examine a recent issue of the journal Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts submitted to Biomedical Journals (ICMJE) [www.icmje.org] CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) [www.consort-statement.org]

  6. Most often ignored instructions Word counts Reference formats: in-text citations or referencing incorrect Tables/figures: inserting in the text rather than at the end of the manuscript or as separate files Poor quality: figures/photos or non-standard formats Abbreviations: failure to write out the first time they are written in the manuscript

  7. Reviewer’s comments Comply with as many reviewer requests as possible Disagree or explain reasons for non-compliance politely and well argued

  8. Categorising comments Difference of opinion irresolvable Request impossible Request possible butimpractical Difference of interpretation Request acceptable

  9. Replying to reviewers’ comments • Point-by-point reply • Highlight the changes you have made clearly • Keep your reply short and to the point • Answer reviewers’ questions in the manuscript • —not only in your point-by-point reply

More Related