1 / 15

Incentives, Certification and Targets in Performance Budgeting

Incentives, Certification and Targets in Performance Budgeting. Research Purpose. Investigate which reforms— an incentive approach, certification approach, and target approach— a seasoned public manager thinks will allocate discretion most decisively, control aggregate spending, and

loman
Download Presentation

Incentives, Certification and Targets in Performance Budgeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Incentives, Certification and Targets in Performance Budgeting

  2. Research Purpose Investigate which reforms— an incentive approach, certification approach, and target approach— a seasoned public manager thinks • will allocate discretion most decisively, • control aggregate spending, and • which can produce trust in government Develop hypotheses for future research Assume budget reform selection is á la carte

  3. Incentive approach Reverses “spend it or lose it” end of year behavior Allows carryover of unspent funds Sometimes includes a pay for performance, bonuses, out of true savings

  4. Certification approach • Requires internal audit of performance measures and underlying activity they represent • Some forms require benchmarking

  5. Target approach • Ceiling set for expenditure • Combined with performance levels to form performance contracts in theory

  6. The Model • Trade the details for the totals, a result-reward system • Top down targets or ceilings at one end of a scale • Management oriented lump sum or decentralized budgeting at the other end of the scale • Hinge is the role for performance data • TBB  Performance Measures  Rewards?

  7. The Research Questions • To confirm what exists of our model, we ask four questions: • do Target, Performance Measurement, and Incentive elements of the model exist? • what configuration of the three elements do managers believe allocates discretion most decisively? • what configuration do managers prefer to control aggregate spending? • what elements produce trust in government?

  8. Methods & Findings • Two focus groups • Insiders’ view of three approaches • Public’s view (through manager eyes) on ability to improve trust • A survey and interviews as a pilot study • 8 cities known for cutting-edge management reforms

  9. First focus group • Only targets – ceilings not contracts - will produce savings • Certification of performance could justify increased spending • Retained savings will inevitably get cut; the more elastic the revenue system, the more inevitable the cut, GF, others less so • No consensus on decisive allocation of discretion

  10. Figure 2: Second Focus Group on Trust in Government 1 , 2, etc = Group member 1, GM 2, etc.

  11. 8 Reform Cities No city uses all three: Targets, Performance Measurement, and Retained Savings, but – 5 cities used targets with retained savings (savers) 1 city used retained savings with benchmarked performance measures (performance-informed) 1 city used performance measures and retained savings but no targets 1 city centers all on performance measurement, employs no targets, and allows no retained savings

  12. Our conclusion Variation is the rule-integrating budgeting with management follows no pattern other than contingency • 1 – board of directors model – leaders guard the tax rate levels, a budget first, target or ceiling, performance management later • 2 – checks and balances model in which budgets (FinResources) tradeoff against allocations in staff (HR) and technology (IR) • 3 – line-staff model in which management leads budget. Top managers define goals, divide core from peripheral programs, and use budget and finance as just another staff advisor

  13. Which model when? • Board of directors model is fiscal or political crisis dominated • Checks and balances system reflects indecisive management, a divided leadership in the governing structure, or both strong line and budget departments • Line-staff model requires stable or growing resources • All of these environments form part of the traditional reform budgeting literature

  14. Conclusions • Limited forms of retained savings • Savings linked to targets • Targets not linked to performance

More Related