1 / 21

Comparative Politics of Developing Nations

Comparative Politics of Developing Nations Week 3 (October 16) Roadmap: Colonialism Reaction papers Exams format Final papers Readings next week (update) Current events (Grameen Bank) Pictures I. Colonialism (Clapham & Isbister readings) Colonialism: End: economic Means: technology

lotus
Download Presentation

Comparative Politics of Developing Nations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparative Politics of Developing Nations Week 3 (October 16)

  2. Roadmap: • Colonialism • Reaction papers • Exams format • Final papers • Readings next week (update) • Current events (Grameen Bank) • Pictures

  3. I. Colonialism (Clapham & Isbister readings) • Colonialism: • End: economic • Means: technology • Sequence of colonization: a function of richness & weakness/access • Americas: rich and easy to control • Asia: rich, harder to control • Africa: no obvious wealth, hard access

  4. Sequence of colonization & consequences

  5. Nationalism: Africa vs. Middle East • Africa: divisions (ethnic, religious) • Middle East: unifying effect of ethnicity (Pan Arabism) and religion (Islam)

  6. Colonial government: • Creation of new boundaries • Creation of a new political order and administration → Colonial administration: authoritarian and centralized → Post-colonial administration: * rulers: inherit the sense of superiority of the colonial power * ruled: continue to view the state as an alien imposition

  7. Rule: Direct (French) vs. Indirect (British): • What are the consequences for post-colonial governments? • Generally speaking, British ex-colonies are more democratic than non-British ex-colonies (e.g., French)

  8. Colonialism: Clapham vs. Isbister • What was the main reason behind colonial expansion? • ……? • The culture/legacy of colonialism: • Language • Religion

  9. Exams format: • Concept definition • Human Development Index (HDI):“A composite measure of life expectancy, infant mortality, literacy rate and per capita income used to evaluate living standards.” • Third World:“A category of nations in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East that share two primary characteristics: they are politically and/or economically less developed; and they are neither industrialized democracies (the First World) nor former members of the Soviet-Eastern European bloc of communist nations (the second world). The term “Third World” is used interchangeably with “developing nations” and “less developing countries (LDCs).”

  10. Short questions • What are the various labels or collective names that scholars use for the approximately 140 countries we are studying in this class? Why do they have such a hard time finding an appropriate label (i.e., one that would be uncontroversial and universally accepted)?

  11. Explain why, in most cases, there is a correlation between economic, social and political development. On the other hand, explain in what circumstances they are not correlated, and why. • Is income per capita the best measure of development and the well-being of people living in a society? Why (or why not)? • What is the Human Development Index? What does it do? How?

  12. Multiple choice • In his discussion of critiques of modernization theory, Handelman mentions Samuel Huntington as an example of _____________________________: • a) A liberal critique • b) A conservative critique • c) A libertarian critique • d) A post-modern critique

  13. V. Next week readings • Out:Collier, Paul, and Jan Willem Gunning. 1999. “Why Has Africa Grown Slowly?” • In: • The Economist. 2006. “The real digital divide.” Annual Editions: Developing World 2006/2007 (pp. 90-91). • Foreign Policy. 2006. “Ranking the Rich 2004.” AE (pp. 73-79). • Marglin, Stephen A. 2006. “Development as Poison: Rethinking the Western Model of Modernity.” AE (pp. 21-25). • Sachs, Jeffrey D. 2006. “The Development Challenge.” AE (pp. 5-10).

  14. Current events? • Grameen Bank • Who? Muhammad Yunus • Where? the village of Jobra, Bangladesh (1976) • A loan of $27 to a group of 43 families • Results: • US$ 5.72 billion disbursed • 6.61 million borrowers; 97 percent women • over 250,000 “telephone ladies” • “Beggars As Members” (over 81,000)

  15. Final papers guidelines: • Ten to twenty pages long • (3,000 to 6,000 words) • Double-spaced, default margins, Times New Roman 12 fonts • Bibliography + appendices + notes - do not count toward the limit • Most likely, topics will be relativelyopen-ended

  16. Topics I: • Prospects for democracy in Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia • How democratic is each of these countries? • What factors account for their (relative) level of democracy? • I.e., if A is more democratic than B, why? • Think of prospects for democracy (20 yrs) • Do you expect any significant changes? • Why? (or why not)?

  17. Topics I (cont.): • Democracy in Romania in comparative perspective • Choose four countries: one from L. America, one from Asia/Middle East, one from Africa, and one from EE/fSU (other than Romania) • The “most similar case” to Romania (in terms of the variables that you think are most important for democracy) • Justify your choices. How democratic is each of these countries? Is the outcome the expected one in each case? Why (or why not)?

  18. Topics I (cont.): • Modernization theory, dependency theory, and globalization: lessons for Romanian policy-makers and scholars • How well do modernization theory and dependency theory explain Romania’s pre-1989 economic, social and political course? • What about its post-1989 trajectory? • What about its future path?

  19. Topics I (cont.): • Institutional design and political consequences: Romania, 1990-2006 • Discuss the impact of political institutions - executive-legislative relations, electoral system (+any other institutional feature) • Positives and negatives; give overall assessment • What institutional changes would you see as beneficial? • How do you see the post-1991 changes? • With the benefit of hindsight, if you were a decision-maker in 1989-91, what, if anything, would you do differently?

  20. Topics II: • “Islamic Fundamentalism versus Zionism” • Comparative analysis of post-Soviet development in Central Asia • “National Culture and Economic Performance” • "Aging Policies and Living Arrangements“ • P-S-E Developments in Afghanistan and Iraq • Theories of imperialism and colonialism & impact on developing nations

More Related