1 / 8

ERAC ad-hoc working group on the European Semester and on Monitoring ERA

ERAC ad-hoc working group on the European Semester and on Monitoring ERA. Ward ZIARKO June 2013. Conclusions of the ad-hoc working group on European Semester. NRP is not ( and can not ) be a detailed reporting on all R&I activities

louise
Download Presentation

ERAC ad-hoc working group on the European Semester and on Monitoring ERA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ERAC ad-hoc workinggroup on the European Semester and on Monitoring ERA Ward ZIARKO June 2013

  2. Conclusions of the ad-hoc workinggroup on European Semester • NRP is not (andcannot) be a detailedreporting on all R&I activities • No state of play; bias towards new activities • Role of other instruments (databases, surveys,…) to get a complete overview on R&I landscape (e.g. R&IO) • NRP : “guidance” notetoensure common understanding on whatandhowto report

  3. Conclusions of the ad-hoc workinggroup on European Semester (2) • Interest forexploringan OECD-type survey (possiblywith OECD) on the R&I landscape in order tobeabletoproduce R&I trend reports • Needtocarefullysynchronise ERA monitoring with European semester • 27th of june : first draft on guidancenotecouldbeproduced (?)

  4. Conclusions of the ad-hoc workinggroup on ERA progress report (1) • State of play : • Group was informed on the process • Milestones, data output andstructure of the report wereclarified • Stakeholder survey : • Open discussion on scope of results, strengthsandweaknesses • partialvision (first step) • Concerns aboutrepresentativenessandusefor policy conclusions (at European council)

  5. Conclusions of the ad-hoc workinggroup on ERA progress report (2) • Stakeholder survey (2) : • Concerns on insufficienttime tocomment on resultsand data • Agreed on the invitationtocollaborateandworktogethertoimprove the wholeexercise • Indicators : • First discussion : concrete proposals on limitednumber is needed • Discussion on the needto test the indicators • Caution ! High quality standards !

  6. Conclusions of the ad-hoc workinggroup on ERA progress report (3) • Expert group : discussed the role of the group in the prioritisation of the ERA actions • Most urgent homework : • Look at the country fiches (countriesindividually, not the group) • Take a look at the list of indicators

  7. Conclusions of the ad-hoc workinggroup on ERA progress report (3) • Elements toreflect on (Homework part 2) : • Identifyhowtosteer the policy process • Reflect on possible links between the European semester and the ERA progress reports • How do we copewith the lack of time toevaluate the results ? • Possible link with R&IO

  8. Conclusions of the ad-hoc workinggroup on ERA progress report (4) • Next meeting : 27 june • Mandate : written procedure

More Related