1 / 26

High-Performing, High-Poverty, Turnaround Middle Schools

Middle Level School Principal Seminar In partnership of TASSP, Dana Center, STAR Center, and UTEP March 30, 2004 Doubletree Hotel, Austin, Texas. High-Performing, High-Poverty, Turnaround Middle Schools. Seminar Goals.

louvain
Download Presentation

High-Performing, High-Poverty, Turnaround Middle Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Middle Level School Principal Seminar In partnership of TASSP, Dana Center, STAR Center, and UTEP March 30, 2004 Doubletree Hotel, Austin, Texas High-Performing, High-Poverty, Turnaround Middle Schools

  2. Seminar Goals • What can be learned from high-performing, high poverty, turn-around middle schools? • How does my school compare to high-performing, high poverty, turn-around middle schools? • What can be done to begin the improvement process at my school?

  3. Turning Points 2000

  4. Guiding Questions (Marzano) • To what extent do people in schools engage in certain behaviors to address a wide variety of issues? • How much will a change in our current practices increase the academic achievement of our students? • How much effort will it take to significantly change your current practices?

  5. High-Performing, High-Poverty, Turnaround Middle Schools Ali Picucci Amanda Brownson Rahel Kahlert Andrew Sobel Charles A. Dana Center–University of Texas at Austin Prepared for: The U.S. Department of Education’s Planning and Evaluation Service The cross case analysis and the case studies are available on the Charles A. Dana Web site: www.utdanacenter.org Driven To Succeed:

  6. Overview of Study • This study investigated how seven high-poverty middle schools managed to demonstrate strong academic improvement • The purpose of this study was • To contribute to a larger body of work • To focus on what practices, policies, and belief systems enhanced teaching and learning • To capture procedural knowledge that will be useful to other schools in a similar context • To provide recommendations suggested by the findings

  7. Site selection • The seven public middle schools selected had the following characteristics: • A strong growth rate • Student performance at or above the state average • At least 50 percent participation in free or reduced-price lunch program • Represented typical high-poverty schools • A good reputation among educational leaders

  8. Location of the middle schools • Tonasket, WA • Eagle Pass, TX • Houston, TX • Rockcastle, KY • Atlanta, GA • Pokomoke, MD • Utica, NY

  9. Methods • One four-day visit to each site • Interviews • Focus groups • Observations • Teacher surveys • Document collection • Transcribed and coded interview and focus group data for analysis

  10. Limitations of the study • Schools did not have a control group • School visit took place at one point in time • Classroom practices were not a focus of this study • Teacher certification issues • School improvement sustainability

  11. Key findings • The key findings address two broad areas: • Characteristics (Part 1) To understand characteristics of high poverty middle schools that have demonstrated strong performance • Change and Improvement (Part 2) To understand the process how schools changed and improved

  12. Reading Assignment • Executive Summary pages 2-4 • Read in 6 chunks • Findings of This Study • Schools That Support Teaching and Learning • Key Finding 1 • Key Finding 2 • Key Finding 3 • Key Finding 4 • After each chunk, turn to a neighbor and “Say Something” about what you read.

  13. Part 1:Key findings—Characteristics • To support teaching and learning, these schools were: • Driven by a common purpose of high expectations for all • Dedicated to collaborative environments • Creating thoughtful organizational structures and building the capacity of the system • Attentive to individual students and their needs

  14. Characteristics:I. High expectations • High expectations were sustained through: • Caring about individual students • Instilling pride and recognition for student and staff • Staying focused on high expectations for all

  15. II. Dedication to collaborative environments • Collaborative environments were built by: • Collaborating in schools • Redefining relationships within districts • Seeking relationships with outside entities

  16. III. Organizational structures and capacity • These schools supported teaching and learning through: • Implementing organizational structures • Using data to make informed decisions • Redefining staff development

  17. IV. Attention to individual students • Being attentive to individual students required providing resources such as time and money that could be used for: • Preventing students from being invisible • Extending the school day • Expanding academic opportunities during the school day • Transitioning elementary students

  18. Challenges • All of these schools faced challenges to: • Maintaining high expectations • Maintaining collaborative environments • Creating organizational structures • Providing individual attention to each student

  19. Walk Away With: • To support teaching and learning, these schools were: • Driven by a common purpose of high expectations for all • Dedicated to collaborative environments • Creating thoughtful organizational structures and building the capacity of the system • Attentive to individual students and their needs

  20. Reading Assignment • Executive Summary pages 5-6 • Read in 4 chunks • Understanding How Schools Improved • Key Finding 1 • Key Finding 2 • Key Finding 3 • After each chunk, turn to a neighbor and “Say Something” about what you read.

  21. Part 2:Key Findings—Change and improvement • Understanding the process of how schools changedand improved • These schools worked towards • Understanding their context • Intentionally implementing elements of school improvement • Using an approach to school improvement that fits

  22. Change and improvement:I. Understanding the context • These schools were driven to understand how their school improvement efforts were affected by the larger context. • This understanding depended on: • Identifying starting points • Recognizing changes in the environment • Reacting positively and proactively

  23. Change and improvement: II. Elements of school improvements • Improving these schools required key elements to be put into place. This happened in these schools by: • Building a shared purpose • Shaping a school culture • Reflecting on current situations • Planning and implementing strategies • Re-evaluating

  24. Change and improvement:III. Approaches to improvement • Schools implemented changes through two approaches – depending on best fit: • Implementing whole school reform • Implementing incremental change

  25. Walk Away With: • Understanding the process of how schools changedand improved • These schools worked towards • Understanding their context • Intentionally implementing elements of school improvement • Using an approach to school improvement that fits

  26. Conclusion • We need to remember that • These schools are not unique in their challenges • Staff took responsibility for student learning • Every student can learn and deserves to learn • The successes at these schools are not inimitable

More Related