1 / 7

Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs

Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs. Dr Caroline Grant Medical Device Domain Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation. Instron load cell: Force Position (1-10MB per test). FARO arm Position (<1MB per test). γ. β. Strain Gauges

loyal
Download Presentation

Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Managing Research Data:Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs Dr Caroline Grant Medical Device Domain Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation

  2. Instron load cell: • Force • Position • (1-10MB per test) • FARO arm • Position • (<1MB per test) γ β • Strain Gauges • Surface strain • (deformation) • (50-100MB per test) 5 computers Total up to 300MB In ~100 files Per test, raw data α 3 sample types 7 load cases • Optotrak • Optical position • tracking • (50-200MB per test) • JR3 6 axis load cell: • Force x3 • Torque x3 • (~100kB per test)

  3. Solid model from CT, align to mech test FARO arm data • ~ 200MB CT • ~ 2-10GB per analysis • 1 test = up 10+ analyses

  4. Total data generated last 9 months of PhD • Mechanical testing – 4.25GB • 1655 Files, 225 Folders • Modelling – 1.47TB • 7072 Files, 1456 Folders

  5. Researchers nightmare • Research at a children’s hospital • Human ethics approval for clinical research on children in the intensive care unit • Raw data, processed data, analysed data ~8 years of data • IT department : New backup system! Yay! • All processed data corrupted • Some analysed data corrupted • Some raw data corrupted • Saved by having our own backup system (after having been advised not to) • IT repeatedly claimed there was no problem with the system • Threatened to sue • Involved data safety monitoring committee • This is a major problem because: • Unethical • If you breach data safety monitoring guidelines, ethics will not approve future studies • If you can’t get ethics approval, you can’t get grants. • By QUT’s guidelines this data needs to be kept for 25years after the date of birth of the last child recruited

More Related