1 / 48

High frequency q uoting : short-term volatility in bid/ask quotes

High frequency q uoting : short-term volatility in bid/ask quotes. Joel Hasbrouck. Now available at http://pages.stern.nyu/~jhasbrou. Illustration. AEPI is a small Nasdaq -listed manufacturing firm. Market activity on April 29, 2011 National Best Bid and Offer (NBBO)

lynnea
Download Presentation

High frequency q uoting : short-term volatility in bid/ask quotes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High frequency quoting: short-term volatility in bid/ask quotes Joel Hasbrouck Now available at http://pages.stern.nyu/~jhasbrou

  2. Illustration • AEPI is a small Nasdaq-listed manufacturing firm. • Market activity on April 29, 2011 • National Best Bid and Offer (NBBO) • The highest bid and lowest offer (over all market centers)

  3. National Best Bid and Offer for AEPI during regular trading hours

  4. Discussion points • The features of the AEPI episode. • Implications of short-term quote volatility. • Price risk and order timing uncertainty. • Time scale variance decompositions • Analysis of millisecond-stamped TAQ data • Dealing with truncated time stamps • Analysis of historical second-stamped TAQ data • Connections to existing studies • Outstanding questions • More pictures from the HFQ gallery

  5. Short-term quote volatility … • Degrades the informational value of the quotes. • Induces execution price risk for marketable orders. • And dark trades that use the bid and ask as reference prices. • Impedes monitoring of market performance. • A dealer guarantees that he will sell to me at the market’s prevailing ask price. • Prevailing as of when? • Short-term quote volatility increases the value of the dealer’s look-back option. (Stoll and Schenzler)

  6. Execution price risk for marketable orders • A buyer submits a marketable order at time . • The limit price is “infinite”. • Executed on arrival at the lowest offer. • Arrival is subject to a delay that is uniform random on • The execution price is random. • The outcome is characterized by mean and variance (risk) of price over

  7. Connection to transaction cost analysis • Implementation shortfall imputation of trading cost is the difference between actual execution price and a benchmark price. • When there is timing uncertainty, a common benchmark is the value- or time-weighted price over a series of trades or an interval. • Usually the interval is an hour or a day.

  8. Other sources of timing uncertainty • Information transmission lags • There are about • 17 “lit” market centers • publish visible quotes • 20 dark pools • don’t publish quotes, do report trades • 200 executing brokers • don’t publish quotes, do report trades

  9. Time-scale decompositions • A time series = sum of components • Each component is associated with a particular time scale (“horizon”) • Each component is associated with a variance. • Horizons and components are constructed systematically using wavelet transforms

  10. Sources • Percival, Donald B., and Andrew T. Walden, 2000. Wavelet methods for time series analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge). • Gençay, Ramazan, Frank Selçuk, and Brandon Whitcher, 2002. An introduction to wavelets and other filtering methods in finance and economics (Academic Press (Elsevier), San Diego).

  11. A microstructure wavelet perspective • Ask prices over 8 “millisecond” intervals • A trader with arrival uncertainty over this interval buys (on average) at • Deviations:

  12. The wavelet smooth is • The wavelet rough is • “3” refers to time-scale (log base two): • “ is constant over ms”

  13. A faster trader has arrival uncertainty of 4 ms. • He will trade within one of two 4 ms. windows: • His average price is either • , or • From his perspective where • Interpretation of “2”: “ is constant over ms.”

  14. The fastest trader: arrival uncertainty of 2 ms. • He will trade within one of four two-ms. windows: • From his perspective • Where • “ is constant over ms.”

  15. etails • Detail varies only at scale j. • Rough varies at scale j and finer scales.

  16. Decomposition into • A detail varies over time scale • Details are orthogonal:

  17. Variance decompositions • The price risk of the fastest trader (2 ms) • The price risk of the faster trader (4 ms) • The price risk of the fast trader (8 ms)

  18. Formally, this is the Haar discrete wavelet transform. • One of a family of weighting/differencing schemes • Construct successive averages and differences in averages over intervals of length 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, … • Does N have to be an integer power of 2? • No. Received wisdom favors maximal overlap transforms (which don’t have this limitation).

  19. Sampling properties • We can obtain asymptotic distributional results for difference-stationary processes. • A fifteen minute sample at ms.frequency has 900,000 observations. • But with discreteness and infrequent price changes, asymptotic validity is questionable. • I construct my estimates over 15-minute samples, and in panels.

  20. An aside: should we work with price differences or levels? • Differencing at the resolution of the data obscures longer-term features. • “Differencing is a high-pass filter.”

  21. Economic significance I • How large is the risk relative to other trading costs? • If we’re analyzing price levels, the units of are $ (per share) • Rescale to mils (one mil = $0.001) • Access fees in US equity exchanges are capped at three mils. • What is compared to three mils?

  22. Economic significance II • How large is the risk relative to share value? • Some costs are measured as price relatives. • “The relative bid-ask spread is 0.1%, which is 10 basis points.” • measures relative volatility

  23. Economic significance III • How large is the risk relative to what we’d expect from a random-walk? • For , get • The variance ratio between j and k is • Where j corresponds to a short interval (subsecond) and k to a longer interval (30 minutes)

  24. Sample for cross-sectional analysis • For all CRSP firms present January through March of 2011, compute average daily dollar volume. • Sort into decile groups. • Take first ten firms in each group. • Reported results collapsed into quintiles.

  25. Bid and ask • Source: TAQ with millisecond time-stamps, • All trading days in April 2011 • Construct series for National best bid and offer at one millisecond resolution. • Wavelet variances calculated over 15-minute intervals, 9:45-15:45

  26. Summary statistics (excerpt from Table 1.)

  27. NBBO volatility, mils per share(Table 2 Panel A excerpt)

  28. Table 2 Panel B excerptbasis points (0.01%) • Short-run volatility seems flatter across firms when it’s measured in mils per share

  29. NBBO variance ratios, “short/long”(Table 3, excerpt)

  30. Bid-ask correlations (by time-scale)

  31. The cross-sectional results: a summary • In mils per share or basis points, short term volatility is on average small. • Variance ratios: short term volatility is much higher than we’d expect when calibrated to a random-walk. • Bid-ask correlations are often weak at sub-second time-scales. • These findings are particularly true for low-activity firms.

  32. High-resolution analysis … … with low resolution data • TAQ with millisecond time stamps only available from 2006 onwards • TAQ with second time stamps available back to 1993. • Can we draw inferences about subsecond variation from second-stamped data?

  33. Truncated time stamps • Assume that in a given second • We have N quote records • They are correctly sequenced. • The one-second time-stamps are generated by truncation of the millisecond remainder. • The arrival rate over the second is constant-intensity Poisson. • Then relative to the start of the second, the arrival time of the kth quote is distributed as the kth order statistic in a sample of variates.

  34. A Bayesian imputation approach • Additional assumption • The arrival times are independent of the bid and ask realizations. • Simulate the millisecond arrival times and perform analysis on simulated data. • Check: try it on millisecond-stamped data, and see how results for simulated data match up with original data.

  35. Correlations between wavelet variances computed • Using the orginalms. time stamps, and • Using simulation ms.time stamps

  36. Why is agreement so good? • Time averaging implicit and explicit. • When the quotes are sparse (within the second), high-frequency variances are not highly sensitive to placement. • When the quotes are dense (within the second), the distribution of their arrival times is tight. • Agreement is weaker for correlations.

  37. The historical sample • Construct dollar trading volume for all CRSP firms in the first quarter of each year 2001-2011 • In each year, take three firms from each dollar voldecile (30/firms per year) • 2001: only firms that traded in $0.01 • Analyze April Monthly TAQ data, 9:45-15:45

  38. Summary statistics, historical sample (Table 6, excerpt)

  39. NBBO Volatility, mils ($0.001) / share; (Table 7, excerpt)

  40. Given the increased quote traffic, why didn’t short-term quote volatility explode? • The good old days weren’t really that good. • “Gapping the quote” • Maybe the bad new days aren’t so nasty. • … At least between 9:45 and 15:45

  41. Variance ratios, “short/long”(Table 8 excerpt)

  42. The elements of the story • There is a presumption that HF activity has increased over the 2000’s • Strong trend in quote traffic • Short-term volatility (mils per share) does not show a clear increase. • Variance ratios show increase relative to 2001 (but not uniformly)

  43. Connection to high frequency trading • Brogaard(2012), Hendershott and Riordan (2012) use Nasdaq HFT dataset: trades used to define a set of high frequency traders. • Hendershott, Jones and Menkveld (2011): NYSE message traffic • Hasbrouck and Saar (2012): strategic runs / order chains • General consensus: HF activity enhances market quality and lowers volatility. • Quote volatility results are less uniform.

  44. Connection to realized volatility literature • Realized volatility = summed (absolute/squared) price changes. • Andersen, Bollerslev, Diebold and Ebens (2001), and others • Hansen and Lunde (2006) advocate pre-averaging to eliminate microstructure noise. • Present paper: “Don’t throw out the noise!”

  45. Open questions • Analysis in this paper focuses on average HF volatility. • But HFQ is marked by extreme and interesting outliers. • What are the strategies? • Are the HFQ episodes cases of “dueling algos”? Or • Are they sensible strategies to detect and access liquidity? • Wavelet signal processing methods show great promise in isolating strategic microstructure effects from long-term information noise.

  46. A plot of the first differences …

  47. … of this time series

More Related