1 / 48

High School Mathematics at the Research Frontier

High School Mathematics at the Research Frontier. Don Lincoln Fermilab. http://www-d0.fnal.gov/~lucifer/PowerPoint/HSMath.ppt. What is Particle Physics?. High Energy Particle Physics is a study of the smallest pieces of matter.

mac
Download Presentation

High School Mathematics at the Research Frontier

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High School Mathematics at the Research Frontier Don Lincoln Fermilab http://www-d0.fnal.gov/~lucifer/PowerPoint/HSMath.ppt

  2. What is Particle Physics? High Energy Particle Physics is a study of the smallest pieces of matter. It investigates (among other things) the nature of the universe immediately after the Big Bang. It also explores physics at temperatures not common for the past 15 billion years (or so). It’s a lot of fun.

  3. Fermilab 4x10-12 seconds Stars form (1 billion years) Now (15 billion years) Atoms form (300,000 years) Nuclei form (180 seconds) Nucleons form (10-10 seconds) ??? (Before that)

  4. DØ Detector: Run II • Weighs 5000 tons • Can inspect 3,000,000 collisions/second • Will record 50 collisions/second • Records approximately 10,000,000 bytes/second • Will record 1015(1,000,000,000,000,000) bytes in the next run (1 PetaByte). 30’ 30’ 50’

  5. Remarkable Photos In this collision, a top and anti-top quark were created, helping establish their existence This collision is the most violent ever recorded. It required that particles hit within 10-19 m or 1/10,000 the size of a proton

  6. How Do You Measure Energy? • Go to Walmart and buy an energy detector? • Ask the guy sitting the next seat over and hope the teacher doesn’t notice? • Ignore the problem and spend the day on the beach? • Design and build your equipment and calibrate it yourself.

  7. 150 lbs ?? Volts Volts are a unit of electricity Car battery = 12 Volts Walkman battery = 1.5 Volts Build an Electronic Scale

  8. Make a line, solve slope and intercept y = m x + b Voltage = (0.05) weight + 3 Implies Weight = 20 (Voltage – 3) This implies that you can know the voltage for any weight. For instance, a weight of 60 lbs will give a voltage of 6 V. Now you have a calibrated scale. (Or do you?) Calibrating the Scale

  9. Issues with calibrating. All four of these functions go through the two calibration points. Yet all give very different predictions for a weight of 60 lbs. What can we do to resolve this?

  10. Easy Hard Approach: Take More Data

  11. Solution: Pick Two Points Dreadful representation of data

  12. Solution: Pick Two Points Better, but still poor, representation of data

  13. Why don’t all the data lie on a line? • Error associated with each calibration point. • Must account for that in data analysis. • How do we determine errors? • What if some points have larger errors than others? How do we deal with this?

  14. First Retake Calibration Data • Remeasure the 120 lb point • Note that the data doesn’t always repeat. • You get voltages near the 9 Volt ideal, but with substantial variation. • From this, estimate the error.

  15. Data While the data clusters around 9 volts, it has a range. How we estimate the error is somewhat technical, but we can say 9  1 Volts

  16. Redo for All Calibration Points

  17. Redo for All Calibration Points

  18. Both lines go through the data. How to pick the best one?

  19. State the Problem • How to use mathematical techniques to determine which line is best? • How to estimate the amount of variability allowed in the found slope and intercept that will also allow for a reasonable fit? • Answer will be m Dm and b Db

  20. Looks Intimidating! The Problem • Given a set of five data points, denoted (xi,yi,si) [i.e. weight, voltage, uncertainty in voltage] • Also given a fit function f(xi) = m xi + b • Define

  21. Forget the math, what does it mean? Each term in the sum is simply the separation between the data and fit in units of error bars. In this case, the separation is about 3. f(xi) yi - f(xi) si yi xi

  22. More Translation So Means Since f(xi) = m xi + b, find m and b that minimizes the c2.

  23. Calculus Approach Find m and b that minimizes c2 Back to algebra Note the common term (-2). Factor it out.

  24. Move terms to LHS Factor out m and b terms Rewrite as separate sums Approach #2 Now distribute the terms

  25. Approach #3 Substitution Note the common term in the denominator Notice that this is simply two equations with two unknowns. Very similar to You know how to solve this

  26. ohmigod…. yougottabekiddingme So each number isn’t bad

  27. Approach #4 Inserting and evaluating, we get m = 0.068781, b = 0.161967 What about significant figures? 2nd and 5th terms give biggest contribution to c2 = 2.587

  28. Best Fit

  29. Best Best vs. Good

  30. Doesn’t always mean good

  31. A new hypothetical set of data with the best line (as determined by the same c2 method) overlaid Goodness of Fit Our old buddy, in which the data and the fit seem to agree

  32. New Important Concept • If you have 2 data points and a polynomial of order 1 (line, parameters m & b), then your line will exactly go through your data • If you have 3 data points and a polynomial of order 2 (parabola, parameters A, B & C), then your curve will exactly go through your data • To actually test your fit, you need more data than the curve can naturally accommodate. • This is the so-called degrees of freedom.

  33. Degrees of Freedom (dof ) • The dof of any problem is defined to be the number of data points minus the number of parameters. • In our case, • dof = 5 – 2 = 3 • Need to define the c2/dof

  34. c2/dof = 22.52/(5-2) = 7.51 Goodness of Fit c2/dof near 1 means the fit is good. Too high  bad fit Too small  errors were over estimated Can calculate probability that data is represented by the given fit. In this case: Top: < 0.1% Bottom: 68% In the interests of time, we will skip how to do this. c2/dof = 2.587/(5-2) = 0.862

  35. Recall that we found m = 0.068781, b = 0.161967 What about uncertainty and significant figures? If we take the derived value for one variable (say m), we can derive the c2 function for the other variable (b). The error in b is indicated by the spot at which the c2 is changed by 1. So  0.35 Uncertainty in m and b #1

  36. Recall that we found m = 0.068781, b = 0.161967 What about uncertainty and significant figures? If we take the derived value for one variable (say b), we can derive the c2 function for the other variable (m). Uncertainty in m and b #2 The error in m is indicated by the spot at which the c2 is changed by 1. So  0.003

  37. So now we know a lot of the story m = 0.068781  0.003 b = 0.161967  0.35 So we see that significant figures are an issue. Finally we can see Uncertainty in m and b #3 Voltage = (0.069  0.003) × Weight + (0.16  0.35) Final complication: When we evaluated the error for m and b, we treated the other variable as constant. As we know, this wasn’t correct.

  38. c2min + 1 c2min + 2 c2min + 3 b Best b & m More complicated, but shows that uncertainty in one variable also affects the uncertainty seen in another variable. m Error Ellipse

  39. Increase intercept, keep slope the same Increase intercept, keep slope the same To remain ‘good’, if you increase the intercept, you must decrease the slope

  40. Decrease slope, keep intercept the same Similarly, if you decrease the slope, you must increase the intercept

  41. From both physical principles and strict mathematics, you can see that if you make a mistake estimating one parameter, the other must move to compensate. In this case, they areanti-correlated(i.e. if b, then m and if b, then m.) b m Error Ellipse Best b & m new b within errors bbest When one has an m below mbest, the range of preferred b’s tends to be above bbest. mbest new m within errors

  42. Data and error analysis is crucial, whether you work in a high school lab… Back to Physics

  43. Or the Frontier!!!!

  44. References • P. Bevington and D. Robinson, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York, 1992. • J. Taylor, An Introduction to Error Analysis, Oxford University Press, 1982. • Rotated ellipses • http://www.mecca.org/~halfacre/MATH/rotation.htm

  45. http://www-d0.fnal.gov/~lucifer/PowerPoint/HSMath.ppt

  46. http://worldscientific.com/books/physics/5430.html

More Related