1 / 17

ACCA's Compliance Assessment of Auditing Standards: Pass or Fail?

This article discusses how ACCA assesses compliance with auditing standards through a three-stage assessment process. It covers the assessment of firm's quality control and procedures, individual audit files, and overall QA review. The article also explains the basis of audit file assessment and the concept of reasonable assurance. Examples of deficiencies and their impact on the audit report are provided. The importance of training providers in improving audit quality, especially in smaller firms, is also highlighted.

maddock
Download Presentation

ACCA's Compliance Assessment of Auditing Standards: Pass or Fail?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How ACCA assesses compliance with auditing standards

  2. Pass or fail?

  3. Three stage assessment Assessment of firm’s quality control and procedures Assessment of individual audit files Overall assessment of QA review, based on above

  4. Assessment of firm’s quality control procedures Substantial compliance with ISQC1 required Some allowances made for documentation in small firms Major deficiencies in ISQC1 (e.g. ethical considerations) will result in unsatisfactory outcome

  5. Basis of audit file assessment “Perfect” audit files do not exist Always some deficiencies How is an audit file judged to be satisfactory?

  6. Basis of audit file assessment Tidy cross referenced file? No Marks out of 100? No Compliance officer’s professional judgement? Yes, but using defined methodology

  7. Basis of audit file assessment Concept of “reasonable assurance” (ISA 200) Auditor must conclude no material misstatements before issuing clean audit report Conclusion based on accumulation of necessary evidence – as required by ISA

  8. Basis of audit file assessment Identify deficiencies in audit work Evaluate deficiencies Possibility of material misstatement remaining undetected?

  9. Basis of audit file assessment: example 1 Client has material inventory No continuous stock records Auditors fail to attend inventory count No alternative procedures on quantities possible Audit report unqualified Significant possibility of material misstatement remaining undetected

  10. Basis of audit file assessment: example 2 Client is trading at a loss and has substantial borrowings Inadequate compliance with ISA570 No consideration of disclosures Significant possibility of material misstatement remaining undetected (disclosures) and inappropriate audit report

  11. Basis of audit file assessment: example 3 Client is trading at a profit, generating cash and has no borrowings Cursory compliance with ISA570 Little possibility of material misstatement remaining undetected

  12. Audit file assessment: conclusion Number of deficiencies not normally relevant A single deficiency can make the file unsatisfactory

  13. Overall outcome of QA review All audit files examined must be assessed as satisfactory A single deficient file also suggests ISQC1 compliance may be unsatisfactory Major deficiencies in ISQC1 (e.g. ethical considerations) will result in unsatisfactory outcome

  14. The role of training providers Essential role in improving audit quality, especially in smaller firms Reliance placed by regulators on training providers’ reviews Need to work more closely with regulators in future

More Related