1 / 35

Using Robots in Autism Therapy: A Survey of Ongoing Research

Using Robots in Autism Therapy: A Survey of Ongoing Research. Marjorie Skubic Associate Professor Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. Computer Science Dept. (joint apt.). Outline. Motivation – How I got interested Autistic disorders A survey of the research Why robots might help

maddox
Download Presentation

Using Robots in Autism Therapy: A Survey of Ongoing Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using Robots in Autism Therapy: A Survey of Ongoing Research Marjorie Skubic Associate Professor Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. Computer Science Dept. (joint apt.)

  2. Outline • Motivation – How I got interested • Autistic disorders • A survey of the research • Why robots might help • The field of researchers • Conclusions

  3. How I got interested • Research in Human-Robot Interaction • Looking for a killer application • Better – How can we use robots to help people? • Talks at the IEEE RO-MAN 2005 Workshop

  4. Autistic Disorders • 1 of 300 children diagnosed with autism with rates rising • 1 of 800 children diagnosed with Down syndrome • 1 of 450 children diagnosed with juvenile diabetes • 1 of 333 children will develop cancer by age 20 • Diagnosis currently made through behavioral observation • No blood test or genetic screening is available although there is evidence of a genetic link

  5. Autistic Disorders: Characteristics • Inability to relate to other people • Little use of eye contact with other people • Difficulty understanding gestures and facial expressions • Difficulties with verbal & non-verbal communication • Difficulty understanding other’s intentions, feelings, and mental states

  6. Why Use Robots? • Most children, including children with autism, are attracted to robots. • This natural affinity is exploited, and the robot is used as an interactive toy. • Robots may provide a less threatening environment than interacting with people. • Robots can provide a repetitive and more predictable environment. • This “safe” environment can gently push a child with autism towards human interaction.

  7. The Connection to Imitation • One theory: Autism may be caused by early impairments in imitation and shared attention(Rogers & Pennington, 1991) (Baron-Cohen, 1995) • Imitation is a format of communication, a means to express interest and engage others in interaction(Nadel, 1999) • Idea: Use a doll-like robot to engage children with autism and teach basic imitative interaction skills • From: K. Dautenhahn, and A. Billard, Games Children with Autism Can Play With Robota, a Humanoid Robotic Doll, Proc. 1st Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology, 2002

  8. Robota A six-year old autistic boy playing with Robota. He seemed curious about Robota's head movements and so he touches the doll. From: K. Dautenhahn, and A. Billard, Games Children with Autism Can Play With Robota, a Humanoid Robotic Doll, Proc. 1st Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology, 2002

  9. Imitation Using Robota “Robota … allows the child to understand that the doll’s movement originates from his own movement (sense of agency) and is limited to a restricted category of movement (enhances intentional action)” From: J. Nadel, “Early Imitation and a Sense of Agency,” Proc. 4th Intl. Workshop on Epigenetic Robots, 2004

  10. An autistic child playing “chasing” games with the mobile robot From: K. Dautenhahn, and A. Billard, Games Children with Autism Can Play With Robota, a Humanoid Robotic Doll, Proc. 1st Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology, 2002

  11. Joint Attention Using Robota Robota is controlled via teleoperation by the investigator. From: B. Robins, P. Dickerson, and K. Dautenhahn, “Robots as Embodied Beings – Interactionally Sensitive Body Movements In Interactions Among Autistic Children and a Robot,” Proc. RO-MAN 2005

  12. Two autistic children: Note Andy’s gaze at Jack. The investigator encourages the children to show each other how they can interact with the robot. The robot will not move unless the children show the same movement, i.e., they must work together.

  13. Andy and Jack touch each other to balance themselves while each raising a leg.

  14. Adam shows no interest in his classmates and usually tries to avoid the rest of the children. But Adam is interested in Robota. Adam takes Rob’s hand to show him how to interact with Robota.

  15. Interacting with Keepon Keepon is controlled via teleoperation. From: H. Kozima, C. Nakagawa, and Y. Yasuda, “Interactive Robots for Communication-Care: A Case Study in Autism Therapy,” Proc. RO-MAN 2005

  16. Views from Keepon’s camera eyes

  17. Attentive action Emotive action Keepon's kinematic mechanism. Two gimbals are connected by four wires; the lower gimbal is driven by two motors. Another motor rotates the whole inner-structure; yet another drives the skull downward for bobbing.

  18. Enabling Interaction Eye-contact: Referring to each other's mental states Joint attention: Sharing the perceptual information Enables people to exchange intention and emotion toward a target.

  19. Emergence of dyadic interaction. Spontaneous actions to Keepon (left) and actions copied from others (right). Emergence of triadic interaction. The child discovers excitement in Keepon (left) and then looks at the adult to share the excitement (right).

  20. Using Robots for Autism Diagnosis ESRA Playtest From: B. Scassellati, “Quantitative Metrics of Social Response for Autism Diagnosis,” Proc. RO-MAN 2005

  21. Autism Diagnosis Methods • Reaction to the ESRA robot with and without the face configuration Can generate facial expressions using 5 servo motors

  22. At the press of a button, an audio clip is played. The interaction is logged in non-volatile memory. Autism Diagnosis Methods • Measure listening preferences to speech sounds

  23. Autism Diagnosis Methods • Vocal prosody, i.e., how something is said Features F24 vs. F1 Mean pitch * energy vs. mean pitch Separation of two features used in a Bayesian classifier distinguishes low energy categories (neutral and soothing) from high energy categories (approval, attention, and prohibition).

  24. Autism Diagnosis Methods • Position tracking relative to another person

  25. Autism Diagnosis Methods • Gaze direction and focus of attention Red – adolescents with autism Blue – typical adolescents

  26. Linear discriminant analysis of autistic (au) and typical (nc) gaze patterns. Linear filters F(x) are trained to reproduce the gaze pattern G(x) of each individual x and then applied to predict the gaze patterns of any other individual. For example, F(au)*G(self) indicates a filter trained on an individual with autism and tested on that same individual while F(nc)*G(au) indicates a filter trained on a control individual and tested on an individual with autism. The mean performance of this data (y-axis) is a function of the response percentile of individual pairings. Significant differences (all p<0.01 for a two-tailed t-test) are seen between the following classes: (1) F(nc)*G(self), (2) F(au)*G(self), (3) F(nc)* G(other nc), and (4) the three other conditions.

  27. University of Sherbrooke • Project for engineering students: • Design a robotic toy for an autistic child • Educational value • Real world problem • Students work together in a team • Students must first investigate autistic disorders

  28. University of Sherbrooke Pushing Jumbo around the play area. Rolling game with Roball. From: Michaud, F., Théberge-Turmel, C. (2002), "Mobile robotic toys and autism", Socially Intelligent Agents - Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots, Kluwer, pp. 125-132.

  29. University of Sherbrooke Girl showing signs of interest toward Bobus. Assembling the arms and tail of C-Pac. From: Michaud, F., Théberge-Turmel, C. (2002), "Mobile robotic toys and autism", Socially Intelligent Agents - Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots, Kluwer, pp. 125-132.

  30. The Field of Researchers • Francois Michaud • University of Sherbrooke, Canada • Kerstin Dautenhahn & Ben Robbins • University of Hertfordshire, UK • Aude Billard • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL) • Jacqueline Nadel • French National Centre of Scientific Research

  31. The Field of Researchers • Brian Scassellati and Bob Schultz • Yale University • Javier Movellan • University of California – San Diego • Hideki Kozima • National Institute of ICT, Japan • Michio Okada • ATR, Kyoto, Japan

  32. Conclusions • The use of robots for autism therapy and diagnosis is just beginning. • There is anecdotal evidence that robot therapy can help children with autism • How can we start here at MU with the new Thompson Family Center for Autism and Neurodevelopmental Disorders?

  33. Maybe the Tiger Kitty The iCat by Philips Research

  34. Acknowledgements • Thanks to Brian Scassellati, Francois Michaud, Ben Robins, and Hideki Kozima for helpful discussions.

More Related