Scenarios for leveraging Core Capabilities using Enterprise Systems Implementation: An Agenda for Research

1. Scenarios for leveraging Core Capabilities using Enterprise Systems Implementation:An Agenda for Research Simon Woodworth Business Information Systems, UCC

2. Introduction • Desire to gain competitive advantage is a motivator for implementing Enterprise Systems (ES) • But the nature and extent of the contribution of ES to competitive advantage is unclear • Using Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT) and Diffusion Of Innovation Theory (DOI), we can build a framework for examining the interplay between ES and Core Capabilities • Framework can then be used to guide field research using Case Study methodology.

3. ????????? Core Capability Enterprise System ???????????

4. Enterprise Systems • An ES is a package of configurable and customisable modules, embodying best practices, that integrates data, processes, resources and functions across one or more organisations and provides central planning and control of those data, processes, resources and functions.

5. Core Capabilities • A construct of the Resource Based View (RBV) and Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT). • RBV states that capabilities that are Valuable, Rare and Inimitable confer a sustained competitive advantage on an organisation, as long as it is organised to exploit them.

6. Resources and Capabilities • Enabling Capabilities keep you in the game. • Supplemental Capabilities confer competitive advantage but that may easily be eroded by competitors. • Core Capabilities confer competitive advantage but are very hard (or expensive) to imitate or substitute and so any competitive advantage is likely to be sustained.

7. Core Capabilities

8. Core Capabilities and ES • Ideally, an Enterprise system would enhance Core Capabilities • Why? • Resultant Sustained Competitive Advantage would confer the best opportunity to gain a decent return on the investment • Diffusion Of Innovation theory provides a suitable basis for examining how the implementation (or the diffusion) of an ES influences CC

9. DiffusionofInnovation

10. The Research Topic • The interactions between Enterprise Systems and Core Capabilities

11. Research Questions & Hypothesis RQ1 What are the Core Capabilities of the organisation? RQ2 What activities are observed during the Enterprise System implementation? RQ3 What are the interactions between the Core Capabilities and the Enterprise System? H1 The process of Enterprise System implementation determines future Competitive Advantage.

12. Looking for the answers • RQ1 – Core Capabilities • Look for tacit processes (difficult), the history of the organisation, asset positions that are protected by patent or which would be extremely expensive to imitate or substitute. • RQ2 – The Implementation Activities • For example process re-engineering, imposition of control mechanisms, replacement of legacy systems, integration and learning activities, configuration and customisation of new ES. • RQ3 – The Interactions between ES and CC • Examine changes to processes, asset positions and technological opportunities (ability to adapt in future). Do the activities examined in RQ2 change the core capabilities identified in RQ1?

13. Looking for the answers • H1 • The independent variable • The ES implementation process, as determined by RQ2 • The dependent variable • Future competitive advantage, surrogated by changes to Core Capabilities, as determined by RQ1 and RQ3 • Note: How is a Core Capability “enhanced?” • Look at changes to value, rarity, inimitability and organisation’s ability to exploit.

14. ResearchQuestionCoverage RQ1 RQ2, RQ3 H1 H1

15. Research Strategy • Case Study approach • Two cases required • Select cases along dimension of degree of adaptation of deployed ES (Out-of-box versus high degree of customisation)

16. Case 1: • Lots of experimentation • Tweaking the system • Possibly significant customisation costs • Close fit between ES and CC • Enhancement of CC

17. Case 2: • No changes beyond original implementation • Could still be customised but costs might be lower as less is likely to be done • Potential misfit between ES and CC • No enhancement of CC

18. Analysis • Within – case analysis to answer RQ1, RQ2, RQ3 with very concrete view of Core Capabilities • Cross – case analysis to develop a more abstract view of the Core Capabilities concerned and to test H1.

19. Results • Concrete view of Core Capabilities that addresses accusations of tautology, empirical impracticality and vagueness. • We can draw some conclusions about the influence of Enterprise systems and their implementation on Core Capabilities and thus Competitive advantage • This may have implications for ES Implementation practice

20. A simple model Informs Core Capability Enterprise System Reinforces