1 / 10

Polish Managers’ Ability to Use the Potential of Their Employees

Polish Managers’ Ability to Use the Potential of Their Employees. AUTHORS. Dr. Dariusz Użycki Managing Director CEE Deininger Consulting Sp. z o.o. 12 years in consulting business Personal experience in the region from Western Europe till Kazakhstan and Siberian part of Russia

maja
Download Presentation

Polish Managers’ Ability to Use the Potential of Their Employees

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Polish Managers’ Ability to Usethe Potential of Their Employees

  2. AUTHORS Dr. Dariusz Użycki • Managing Director CEE Deininger Consulting Sp. z o.o. • 12 years in consulting business • Personal experience in the region from Western Europe till Kazakhstan and Siberian part of Russia • www.deininger.de • dariusz.uzycki@deininger.pl • +48 22 695 02 10 ; +48 606 362 934 prof. Jacek Miroński • Professor at Warsaw School of Economics (SGH) • Academic Director CEMS MIM (Master of International Management – top 3 in the world in the Financial Times ranking) • Head of Business Communication Department • Teaching in Executive MBA programs • jm67@sgh.waw.pl • +48 692 119 256

  3. SURVEY’S PARTICIPANTS • Daughter-companies of international investors • Companies of pure local origin (Polish capital) • State-owned companies • Owners (entrepreneurs) Statistics and analyzed parameters: • female 19%, male 81% • 18-34 years old 13%, 35-44 years 56%, >44 years 31% • university degree 88%, MBA 48% • size of managed team • size of the company • company location (Mazovia region, rest of Poland)

  4. METHODOLOGY McGregor’s theory of managerial X-Y types • Two questionnaires (attitudes & behaviours) prepared and verified by R.E. Kopelman and others in 2008 and 2009 • 52 statements the respondents were asked to comment upon • 5-level Likert’s scale, with 1 standing for “absolutely not” and 5 standing for “absolutely yes”

  5. STEREOTYPES - „a Polish manager” • communicating mainly top-down, • closed to other people’s ideas (specifically those placed lower in the hierarchy), • loving hierarchy, power and titles, • having low trust in subordinates' good will or commitment, • leaning toward theory X.

  6. GENERAL RESULTS Y BEHAVIOURS ATTITUDES POSTAWY X

  7. DIFFERENCES OF OPINION Largest differences of opinion - Attitudes: 1.Employees prefer opportunity to security (32% yes and 35% of no). 2. Most people will not use their own initiative or do things they have not been specifically assigned to do (33% yes and 37% no). • Most people work to eat and pay their bills rather than because they need to solve problems and be creative (34% yes and 35% no). • Most people will try to do as little work as possible (53% yes and 21% no) Largest differences of opinion - Behaviours: 1.You need to constantly check up on employees to ensure they are working as required (31% yes and 39% no). 2.It is important to continually remind people to meet deadlines (33% yes and 30% no). 3.Employees should not be allowed to set standards of performance, or they will be set too low (30% yes and 40% no).

  8. FEMALE – MALE MANAGERS BEHAVIOURS Y F M F M ATTITUDES X

  9. AGE (LIFE EXPERIENCE) Y BEHAVIOURS 45- 35-44 -34 ATTITUDES X

  10. CONCLUSIONS • Importance of manager’s attitudes, expectations and opinions • Polish and foreign managers • Awareness of management styles • Tendency to control • Doubts for deeper, internal motivation of employees • No differences between men and women • Age – the strongest differentiating parameter • Lower X and higher Y together with the size of the company • MBA, team size, company location – no significant impact

More Related