Drug Advertising, Detailing, Sampling, Etc.

Drug Advertising, Detailing, Sampling, Etc. Bruce Lambert, Ph.D. and Jay Duhig, M.S. Pharmacy Administration, UIC For the FLIP Team PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Lecture Objectives • Summarize main points in current debate about public health effects of DTC advertising • Explain the role of sampling in pharmaceutical company promotion to physicians. • List at least three resources pharmaceutical sales representatives use to influence physician prescribing • Critically evaluate the PhRMA Code on Interactions with Health Professionals and apply it to example scenarios PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Direct to Consumer Ads: Debate about Public Health Risks and Benefits • Overview • Based on Almasi EA, Stafford RS, Kravitz RL, Mansfield PR (2006). What Are the Public Health Effects of Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertising? PLoS Med 3(3): e145 • DTCA legal only in USA and New Zealand (where it may be banned) • Even where it’s legal, gov’ts try to regulate it to maximize benefit/risk ratio • Proponents say is informs public about treatments and stimulates use of appropriate drugs for important diseases (e.g., statins) • Opponents say it’s biased and misleading and increases costs of care by encouraging unnecessary prescribing with no evidence of benefit PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Direct to Consumer Ads: Debate about Public Health Risks and Benefits • Claim 1: DTCA may produce valuable placebo effect • Placebo effect refers to phenomenon where patients experience real relief after taking fake medicine or having fake procedures • Two models of placebo effect • Classical (Pavlovian) conditioning • Expectancy theory PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

DTCAs and Placebo Effect • Ads may create placebo effect which enhances drug effectiveness • May reduce amount of treatment needed • May improve adherence and outcomes • May enhance provider/patient collaboration • Goal of regulation should be to facilitate favorable responses while decreasing inappropriate use PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Claim 2: DTCAs Should be Regulated Not Banned • Background • Rx costs are rising due to increased prices and increased use of old and new drugs • Some drugs over prescribed (antibiotics for URI, antihistamines, benzos and sedatives in elderly, inhaled beta-agonists in kids without controllers for asthma, neuromodulators for pain, sildenafil and fluoxetine for enhanced sexual function). DTCA role in overprescribing at least lowers threshold for prescribing • Some drugs are underprescribed (e.g., beta blockers for MI, ACE inhibitors for CHF, adjuvant hormone or chemo after breast surgery, antibiotics prior to hip surgery, warfarin in atrial fibrillation) PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

DTCAs Should be Regulated Not Banned • By increasing prescribing, DTCAs could be beneficial, harmful or both • “In general, DTCA is most likely to deliver public health benefits when the condition to be treated is serious and when the treatment is safe, effective, and underused. DTCA will tend to deliver net harms when the condition is mild or trivial and when the treatment is potentially dangerous, marginally effective, or overused.” Almasi EA, Stafford RS, Kravitz RL, Mansfield PR (2006). What Are the Public Health Effects of Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertising? PLoS Med 3(3): e145 PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

DTCAs Should be Regulated Not Banned • Implement 2-year DTCA ban for new drugs and require post-marketing surveillance • Tax drug sales and use proceeds to do DTCAs to promote underutilized, safe, effective therapies for high impact conditions PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Claim 3: Harms Outweigh Benefits • Health promotion should be publicly funded • DTCAs focus on expensive new drugs for common uses • Can lead to overprescribing of new drugs and underprescribing of safer, cheaper older drugs • De-emphasizes non-drug therapies and other health hazards PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Claim 3: Harms Outweigh Benefits • DTCAs are more persuasive than informative, often flawed, biased and unbalanced • Creates illusion of being well informed • Manufactures distress by increasing current unhappiness and expectations of future relief • DTCAs are ambiguous and cause indication creep • DTCAs increase many social costs (drugs, biased media, distorted health perceptions, medicalization, distraction from social problems etc.) PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Claim 3: Harms Outweigh Benefits • Root causes • Financial incentives in reimbursement systems to sell expensive drugs • People’s basic gullibility or vulnerability to be misled or persuaded • Many independent studies find net harm from DTCAs • Solution: • Ban DTCAs and regulate drug web sites • Publicly fund health information campaigns based on consensus, high priority messages PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

PhRMA Code on Interactions with Health Professionals • Stated Goals • “inform healthcare professionals about the benefits and risks of our products, • provide scientific and educational information, • support medical research and education, and • obtain feedback and advice about our products through consultation with medical experts.” • http://www.phrma.org/files/PhRMA%20Code.pdf PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

PhRMA Code • “In interacting with the medical community, we are committed to following the highest ethical standards as well as all legal requirements. We are also concerned that our interactions with healthcare professionals not be perceived as inappropriate by patients or the public at large. This Code is to reinforce our intention that our interactions with healthcare professionals are to benefit patients and to enhance the practice of medicine. The Code is based on the principle that a h e a l t h c a re pro fe s s i o na l ’s care of pati e n ts should be based, and should be perceived as being based, solely on each patient’s medical needs and the health-care professional’s medical knowledge and experience.” PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Basis of Interactions • “Our relationships with healthcare professionals are intended to benefit patients and to enhance the practice of medicine. Interactions should be focused on informing healthcare professionals about products, providing scientific and educational information, and supporting medical research and education” PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Informational Presentations by or on behalf of Pharma Company • “Informational presentations and discussions by industry representatives and others speaking on behalf of a company provide valuable scientific and educational benefits. In connection with such presentations or discussions, occasional meals (but no entertainment/recreational events) may be offered so long as they: (a) are modest as judged by local standards; and (b) occur in a venue and manner conducive to informational communication and provide scientific or educational value. Inclusion of a healthcare professional’s spouse or other guests is not appropriate. Offering “take-out” meals or meals to be eaten without a company representative being present (such as “dine & dash” programs) is not appropriate.” PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Third-Party Educational or Professional Meetings • Supporting CMS is OK if $$ goes to meeting sponsor. Content of meeting controlled by meeting sponsor. • Travel, lodging and personal expenses of non-faculty attendees should not be paid. • Meals and receptions can be funded but should be “modest and conducive to discussion among faculty and attendees” PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Third-Party Educational or Professional Meetings • “A conference or meeting shall mean any activity, held at an appropriate location, where (a) the gathering is primarily dedicated, in both time and effort, to promoting objective scientific and educational activities and discourse (one or more educational presentations(s) should be the highlight of the gathering), and (b) the main incentive for bringing attendees together is to further their knowledge on the topic(s) being presented.” PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Consultants • Reasonable fees can be paid for appropriate services and expenses. No token consultants or advisors. • Written contract, legitimate need, specific selection criteria drawn up by relevant experts, reasonable number, maintain records, venue and circumstances of consultation not primarily social or educational PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Speaker Training Meetings • “It is appropriate for healthcare professionals who participate in programs intended to recruit and train speakers for company sponsored speaker bureaus to be offered reasonable compensation for their time, considering the value of the type of services provided, and to be offered reimbursement for reasonable travel, lodging, and meal expenses, when (1) the participants receive extensive training on the company’s drug products and on compliance with FDA regulatory requirements for communications about such products, (2) this training will result in the participants providing a valuable service to the company, and (3) the participants meet the criteria for consultants (as discussed in part 4.a. above).” PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Scholarships and Educational Funds • “Financial assistance for scholarships or other educational funds to permit medical stud e n ts, re s i d e n ts, fe l l ow s, and other healthcare pro fe s s i o nals in training to attend carefully selected educational conferences may be offered so long as the selection of individuals who will receive the funds is made by the academic or training institution. “Carefully selected educational conferences” are generally defined as the major educational, scientific, or policy-making meetings of national, regional, or specialty medical associations.” PMAD 385: Critical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Marketing

Drug Advertising, Detailing, Sampling, Etc.