1 / 29

week 11: 11/26/12 field-based research cont.

week 11: 11/26/12 field-based research cont. all researchers must: a ddress the “double inference” fallacy example: ( pre-test/post-test experimental design with treatment) group A receives training X; group B receives training Y.

malvina
Download Presentation

week 11: 11/26/12 field-based research cont.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. week 11: 11/26/12 field-based research cont.

  2. all researchers must: • address the “double inference” fallacy • example:(pre-test/post-test experimental design with treatment) • group A receives training X; group B receives training Y. • A scores statistically significantly higher on measure of social skills than B • conclusion: kids receiving training X develop better social skills than children receiving training Y

  3. all researchers must (cont.) • manage time. time is finite—start with time and then fit tasks to time • pace themselves—life-long journey not a sprint • stop early enough to prepare for tomorrow • do the final 5%—finish the job

  4. increasing validity in field-based research (Wolcott, 1990) • talk little; listen a lot (field work) • record accurately (field work) • begin writing early (field work and writing) • let readers see for themselves (writing) • report fully (writing) • be candid (field work and writing) • seek feedback (analysis) • achieve balance (field work, writing, analysis) • write accurately (internal validity) (writing)

  5. coding • construct a data record from fieldwork recordings and materials • from often huge data records construct a manageable set of factors • top-down codes: from the literature (etic) • bottom-up codes: codes one constructs from the data record (emic)

  6. Erickson cont. • field-based research based in anthropology and sociology • human action patterned—anthro, by culture; sociology, by social laws. • challenge: people seek patterns, and will see patterns where none exist • the biggest challenge to doing good research is willingness and ability to fool oneself—remain skeptical about claims

  7. data collection • critical of “romantic” notion; for a “process as deliberative as possible” (p. 140) • central issue of method: • bring research questions and data collection into a consistent, albeit an evolving, relationship. • asking explicit questions and seeking relevant data deliberately enable and empower research intuition, rather than stifle it. (p. 140)

  8. 5 major types of evidentiary inadequacy • inadequate amountsof evidence • inadequate variety of kinds of evidence • faulty interpretive status of evidence • inadequate disconfirming evidence • inadequate discrepantcase analysis (pp. 140-141)

  9. ethics and entrance • risk greatest between members of different interest groups in local setting • reports to general scientific audience usually do not expose people to risk • consider reporting in local setting in negotiating access to information about individuals in the setting. (p. 141) • negotiation of entry a complex process (p. 142)

  10. collaborative relationships with informants • tendency of informants to assume researcher’s purpose is evaluative • memorize statement about purposes, procedures, and steps taken to maximize confidentiality and minimize risk • never comment to other team members about anything observed in the site while on the site (p. 142)

  11. data collection as inquiry • identifying full range of variation in formal and informal social organization and meaning-perspectives • collecting recurrent instances of events across wide range of events—establish typicality or atypicality • looking at events at any system level in context of events occurring at next higher or lower system levels (p. 143)

  12. determining the full range of variation • begin comprehensively • later move in successive stages to more restricted observational focus • informants usually not fully aware of the full range and depth of culturally learned and taken-for-granted assumptions of social relations etc. in everyday life (p. 143)

  13. boundedly rational problem solving • fundamental principle: • reflection & write-up takes at least as long as observing; must be completed before returning to the field • bias: decisions • about where and when to observe • about foci of attention while observing • premature typication: conduct deliberate searches for disconfirming evidence (pp. 143-144)

  14. reporting • empirical assertions • analytic narrative vignettes • quotations from fieldnotes • quotations from interviews • maps, tables, figures etc • interpretive commentary—particular • interpretive commentary—general • theoretical discussion • natural history of inquiry in study (p. 145)

  15. validity • the best case for validity: assertions that account for patterns found across both frequent and rare events data record • materials collected in field not data themselves, but resources for data. • from materials, data must be constructed through some formal means of analysis (p. 149)

  16. audiences 1. general scientific community 2. policy makers 3. general community of practitioners 4. members of local community studied (p. 153)

  17. known unknown positively (or neutrally) 1 3 regarded negatively 2 4 regarded • reporting to local audiences a process of teaching the findings

  18. changing one’s mind (Walsh et al.) • do you believe this report? why? • what about generalizability? • what do you learn about teaching from reading this?

  19. video (micro-ethnography) • strengths • capacity for completeness of analysis • reduces dependence of primitive analytic typication • reduces dependence on frequently occurring events as best data sources • limitations • in replaying a tape analyst can only interact with it vicariously • interpretation requires context not on tape

  20. the constraints of video • my account of this lesson is rich because I spent a lot of time looking at the tape and because I knew a lot about the kids. But you know what? The first time I looked at it, I thought, “This was it? What did they get so excited about?” I mean, the tape seemed not too much. The fullness of the moment lies in the sensuality of the experience of the here-and-now. That feeling is missing when looking at a tape or transcript because your ongoing experience is not of the here-and-now

  21. of the interactional record but of your own context. Making the record come alive is a creative act. It requires engaging the document as though it were the here and now, building up a stream of thought within the record itself. Yes? So: if your students have been disappointed by the thinness of their experience of their records, they shouldn’t expect anything different with this tape. The problem doesn’t lie in the record. (John D’Amato, personal communication, 1993)

  22. good intro to fieldwork-based research (with children) Graue, M. Elizabeth, & Walsh, Daniel J. (1998). Studying children in context: Theories, methods, and ethics. Thousand Oaks: Sage. good intro to using video in fieldwork-based research Walsh, D. J., Bakir, N., Lee, T. B., Chung, Y., & Chung, K. (2006). Using Digital Video in Field-Based Research with Children: A Primer. In A. Hatch, Ed., Early childhood qualitative research (pp. 43-62). New York: Routledge.

  23. resources for research skills • Sage Press (www.sagepub.com) • website has many links • dissertators (offer to be peer reader)

  24. writing • before you turn the final draft in, look carefully at the example manuscripts in the APA Manual (do the last 2%) • writers workshop—become a regular • find a good editor; ask editor to make list of common problems • read good writing • write simply; keep sentences short

  25. grad life • dealing with university bureaucracy • know the rules (Grad Programs Handbook) • know the gatekeepers (departmental grad programs secretary) • be wary of “Sherman Hall” advising • consult grad student organizations (see website for links)

  26. getting car ready for winter • check anti-freeze • good scraper and brush • lock de-icer • in trunk (for trips): gloves, hats, sleeping bag, candles, collapsable shovel, flashlight • check weather before you travel • if you haven’t driven on ice before, go to large empty parking lot—practice

  27. places, ways etc. to relieve stress • DCR: organized trips • weekly rituals, e.g., an evening at Urbana Free Library • escapes: e.g., ARC, CRCE, Krannert Art Museum, Café Kopi, Armory, Homer Lake, Carle Park, Dallas & Co. • form a gang, a group, a posse, a rotating potluck • ice arena • friend with a fire place

  28. good ways to find the best courses • DI incomplete list • other graduate students good ways for international students to meet other grad students • ARC, CRCE • clubs • sports • church • go places international students don’t go • get out of Sherman and Orchard Downs

  29. good places cont. • Thai food: Siam Terrace, U; Thai Eatery, YMCA, C • coffee shops: Café Kopi, C; Café Paradiso, U • breakfast: Courier Café, U; Le Peep, C • wine selection: Corkscrew, U • vegetarian food: Red Herring, U

More Related