1 / 29

OLAP

OLAP. Overview. Traditional database systems are tuned to many, small, simple queries. Some new applications use fewer, more time-consuming, analytic queries. New architectures have been developed to handle analytic queries efficiently. The Data Warehouse.

manon
Download Presentation

OLAP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. OLAP

  2. Overview • Traditional database systems are tuned to many, small, simple queries. • Some new applications use fewer, more time-consuming, analytic queries. • New architectures have been developed to handle analytic queries efficiently.

  3. The Data Warehouse • The most common form of data integration. • Copy sources into a single DB (warehouse) and try to keep it up-to-date. • Usual method: periodic reconstruction of the warehouse, perhaps overnight. • Frequently essential for analytic queries.

  4. OLTP • Most database operations involve On-Line Transaction Processing (OTLP). • Short, simple, frequent queries and/or modifications, each involving a small number of tuples. • Examples: Answering queries from a Web interface, sales at cash registers, selling airline tickets.

  5. OLAP • On-Line Analytical Processing (OLAP, or “analytic”) queries are, typically: • Few, but complex queries --- may run for hours. • Queries do not depend on having an absolutely up-to-date database.

  6. Common Architecture • Databases at store branches handle OLTP. • Local store databases copied to a central warehouse overnight. • Analysts use the warehouse for OLAP.

  7. Star Schemas • A star schema is a common organization for data at a warehouse. It consists of: • Fact table : a very large accumulation of facts such as sales. • Often “insert-only.” • Dimension tables : smaller, generally static information about the entities involved in the facts.

  8. Example: Star Schema • Suppose we want to record in a warehouse information about every car sale: the serial number, the date of sale, the dealer who sold the car, the day, the time, and the price charged. • The fact table is a relation: Sales(serialNo, date, dealer, price)

  9. Example -- Continued • The dimension tables include information about the autos, dealers, and days “dimensions”: Autos(serialNo, model, color) Dealers(name, city, state) Days(day, week, month, year) (5, 27, 7, 2000) Day dimension table probably not stored.

  10. Visualization – Star Schema Dimension Table (Autos) Dimension Table (Dealer) Dimension Attrs. Dependent Attrs. Fact Table - Sales Dimension Table (Day) Dimension Table (etc.)

  11. Dimensions and Dependent Attributes • Two classes of fact-table attributes: • Dimension attributes : the key of a dimension table. • Dependent attributes : a value determined by the dimension attributes of the tuple. • price is the dependent attribute of our example Sales relation. • It is determined by the combination of dimension attributes.

  12. Approaches to Building Warehouses • ROLAP = “relational OLAP”: Tune a relational DBMS to support star schemas. • MOLAP = “multidimensional OLAP”: Use a specialized DBMS with a model such as the “data cube.”

  13. Data Cubes • Keys of dimension tables are the dimensions of a hypercube. • Example: for the Sales data, the three dimensions are serialNo, date, and dealer. • Dependent attributes (e.g., price) appear at the points of the cube.

  14. Visualization -- Data Cubes car price dealer date

  15. Slicing and Dicing • Slice • focus on particular partitions along (one or more) dimension i.e., focusing on a particular slice of the cube • WHERE clause in SQL • Dice • partitions the cube into smaller subcubes and the points in each subcube are aggregated • GROUP BY clause in SQL

  16. Slicing and Dicing in SQL SELECT grouping-attributes and aggregations FROM fact table joined with (zero or more) dimension tables WHERE certain attributes are compared with constants/* slicing */ GROUP BY grouping-attributes/* dicing */

  17. Slicing and Dicing Example • Suppose a particular car model, say ‘Gobi’, is not selling as well as anticipated. How to analyze? • Maybe it’s the color… • Slice for ‘Gobi.’ Dice for color. SELECT color, SUM(price) FROM Sales NATURAL JOIN Autos WHERE model = 'Gobi' GROUP BY color; • Doesn’t show anything interesting.

  18. Slicing and Dicing Example • Suppose the previous query doesn't tell us much; each color produces about the same revenue. • Since the query does not dice for time, we only see the total over all time for each color. • We may thus issue a revised query that also partitions time by month. SELECT color, month, SUM(price) FROM (Sales NATURAL JOIN Autos) JOIN Days ON date = day WHERE model = 'Gobi' GROUP BY color, month;

  19. Slicing and Dicing Example • We might discover that red Gobis havn’t sold well recently. • Does this problem exists at all dealers, or only some dealers have had low sales of red Gobis? • Let’s dice on dealer dimension as well. SELECT dealer, month, SUM(price) FROM (Sales NATURAL JOIN Autos) JOIN Days ON date = day WHERE model = 'Gobi' AND color = 'red‘ GROUP BY month, dealer;

  20. Slicing and Dicing Example • At this point, we find that the sales per month for red Gobis are so small that we cannot observe any trends easily. • Thus, we decide that it was a mistake to dice by month. A better idea would be to partition only by years, and look at only the last two years (2006 and 2007). SELECT dealer, year, SUM(price) FROM (Sales NATURAL JOIN Autos) JOIN Days ON date = day WHERE model = 'Gobi' AND color = 'red' AND (year = 2001 OR year = 2002) GROUP BY year, dealer;

  21. Drill-Down and Roll-Up • Previous examples illustrate two common patterns in sequences of queries that slice-and-dice the data cube. • Drill-down is the process of partitioning more finely and/or focusing on specific values in certain dimensions. • Each of the example steps except the last is an instance of drill-down. • Roll-up is the process of partitioning more coarsely. • The last step, where we grouped by years instead of months to eliminate the effect of randomness in the data, is an example of roll-up.

  22. Marginals • The data cube also includes aggregation (typically SUM) along the margins of the cube. • The marginals include aggregations over one dimension, two dimensions,…

  23. Visualization --- Data Cube w/Aggregation car SUM over all Days price dealer date

  24. Cube operator • CUBE(F) is an augmented table for fact table F • tuples (or points) added in CUBE(F) • have a value, denoted * to each dimension • * represents aggregation along that dimension

  25. Example Sales(serialNo, date, dealer, price) Sales(model, color, date, dealer, val, cnt) serialNo dimension not well suited for the cube as summing the price over all dates, or over all dealers, but keeping the serial number fixed has no effect. We will replace the serial number by model and color to which the serial number connects. Also, we will have as independent attributes, val for sum of prices and cnt for number of cars sold.

  26. Example: CUBE(Sale) • ('Gobi', 'red', '2001-05-21', 'Friendly Fred', 45000, 2) • On May 21, 2001, dealer Friendly Fred sold two red Gobis for a total of $45,000. • Hypothetical tuple that would be in both Sales and CUBE(Sales). • ('Gobi', *, '2001-05-21', 'Friendly Fred', 152000, 7) • On May 21, 2001, Friendly Fred sold seven Gobis of all colors, for a total price of $152,000. • Note that this tuple is in CUBE(Sales) but not in Sales.

  27. Example: CUBE(Sale) • ('Gobi', *, '2001-05-21', *, 2348000, 100) • On May 21, 2001, there were 100 Gobis sold by all the dealers, and the total price of those Gobis was $2,348,000. • ('Gobi', *, *, *, 1339800000, 58000) • Over all time, dealers, and colors, 58,000 Gobis have been sold for a total price of $1,339,800,000. • (*, *, *, *, 3521727000, 198000) • Total sales of all models in all colors, over all time at all dealers is 198,000 cars for a total price of $3,521,727,000.

  28. CUBE Helps Answering Queries SELECT color, AVG(price) FROM Sales WHERE model = 'Gobi' GROUP BY color; is answered by looking for all tuples of CUBE(Sales) with the form ('Gobi', c, *, *, v, n) where c is any specific color. v and n will be the sum and number of sales of Gobis in that color. The average price, is v/n. The answer to the query is the set of (c; v/n) pairs obtained from all ('Gobi', c, *, *, v, n) tuples.

  29. CUBE in SQL SELECT model, color, date, dealer, SUM(val) AS v, SUM(cnt) AS n FROM Sales GROUP BY model, color, date, dealer WITH CUBE; Suppose we materialize this into SalesCube. Then the previous query is rewritten into: SELECT color, SUM(v)/SUM(n) FROM SalesCube WHERE model = 'Gobi' AND date IS NULL AND dealer IS NULL;

More Related