1 / 11

Outline of the presentation

Knowledge production, communication and utilization in late modern Sweden: Studying biomedical alcohol research Alexandra Bogren, PhD, SoRAD. Outline of the presentation. The biomedical shift Why the alcohol field? The research project: questions and methods Methodological considerations.

marcy
Download Presentation

Outline of the presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Knowledge production, communication and utilization in late modern Sweden: Studying biomedical alcohol research Alexandra Bogren, PhD, SoRAD

  2. Outline of the presentation • The biomedical shift • Why the alcohol field? • The research project: questions and methods • Methodological considerations

  3. The biomedical shift Current innovations and transformations in biomedical science and technology affect ideas about our bodies, health (e.g., healthy – unhealthy; safe – at risk) and responsibility for health problems (e.g., social – individual responsibility, etc). (Clarke et al 2010, Midanik 2006).

  4. Why the alcohol field? Alcohol policy Biomedical research A tendency to focus the individual’s responsibility for her own health. Reduces individual moral culpability (cf. the disease model). Epigenetics: how lifestyle choices may affect future generations (controversial). • Historically, Swedish alcohol policy has been about collective social responsibility (the welfare state). • Now, a tendency to individualize drinking problems, in the wake of liberalization.

  5. The research project • How do biomedical alcohol researchers produce knowledge about addiction?Which epistemologies, assumptions, and values do they bring to their work, and how do these affect the research outputs? • Ethnography & interviews (research settings), research proposals.

  6. a) How do policymakers and stakeholders understand and use results from biomedical alcohol research? (b) What is the relation between media coverage and policy proposals? • Policy documents & documents from the Medical Products Agency, interviews, longitudinal analysis of newspaper articles and subsequent policy attention & policy action.

  7. How are the results from biomedical alcohol research conceptualized and communicated in the new electronic media, in particular websites and blogs for patient/interest organizations? Analysis of the content and the dissemination patterns of websites and blogs for patient/interest organizations in the alcohol and drug field (e.g., RFHL, RNS, FMN, Swedish Drug Users Union).

  8. Methodological considerations Ethnography: • Daily practiceof researchers (experiments in the lab, discussions at meetings, instructions, computerizedwork, lectures, etc). • Observing practice and “talk-in-interaction” vs interviewing researchers about their practice? • Our solution: both – observing practice & talk result in different types of data compared to interviewing. • In addition, research as described for reviewers at research conuncils (research proposals). Interviews: • Government officials, industry representatives, and NGO representatives views, motives and communication. • Informants vs respondents? • Our solution: informants acting as guides to a process.

  9. Expand the project: the scope of researchers’ attitudes to research practice & communication. • Survey to biomedical alcohol researchers. • National/international? • How to get researchers to reply (time consuming)?

  10. General issues • How to combine the different types of knowledge gained? • Case study (Alvesson & Kärreman 2011). • Friction, breakdowns and “mysteries” as constructive rather than destructive. • Knowledges produced in our project: • Different outlooks on the field (production, consumption, utilization). • Created through a multiperspective approach (situated knowledges; knowledges from the inside & the outside).

  11. Thank you!

More Related