1 / 19

IV.C. Functional Structure and Related Issues

IV.C. Functional Structure and Related Issues. Elasticity of Substitution Read: Blackorby and Russell, “Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up,” AER , 79(1989): 882-8. Chambers, Applied Production Econ , pp. 93-100. Review Homogeneity and Homotheticity on your own.

margie
Download Presentation

IV.C. Functional Structure and Related Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IV.C. Functional Structure and Related Issues • Elasticity of Substitution Read: Blackorby and Russell, “Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up,” AER, 79(1989): 882-8. Chambers, Applied Production Econ, pp. 93-100. Review Homogeneity and Homotheticity on your own.

  2. Hicks (2-goods or inputs case only) -The range of σ is [0,∞]. - Cobb-Douglas example (see notes) -Alternative formula from Silberberg pp. 287-8.

  3. b. Allen Elasticity of Substition AES = The Allen measure is equivalent to the Hicks when there are 2-goods. Allen extended the concept of elasticity of substitution to the multiple good case.

  4. Let’s try to reconcile Allen’s measure with Hicks’ using the 2-good case. where F is the bordered Hessian of the function f(x) [bordered by its own gradient].

  5. Note: 1+2=3 so co-factor switches sign The 1,2 cofactor of this matrix is f1f2 and its determinant is - f11f22 + 2f12f1f2 - f22f12 We can rewrite this in terms of the cost/expenditure function. foc’s from cost min problem: ri – λfi = 0  i y – f(x) = 0

  6. Differentiate focs wrt to r1

  7. Restack in matrices:

  8. Because b is a unit vector, z just extracts the first column of (F*)-1. Thus, if we abstract from r1 to rj

  9. Notes: • AES is symmetric • Each good cannot be an Allen complement for all other goods (at least one Allen substitute for every good). • AES obtains its sign from the cross-price slope of demand. • AES does not conform to our usual concept of elasticity (see BPR paper)

  10. IV.C.2. Separability Read: Blackorby, Primont, and Russell. J. of Econometrics, 5(1977): 195-209. Pope and Hallam, AJAE, 70(1988): 142-52. Paris, Foster, and Green, AJAE, 72(1990): 499-501. Pollak and Wales, Demand System Specification and Estimation, Oxford Univ. Press, 1992 (pp. 36-53).

  11. a. What is Weak Separability Weak Separability says that we can write the separable function F(x) as follows: F(x)=F[f1(x1),f2(x2), … , fm(xm)] The implications of this for us are that it implies that two stage budgeting or conditional optimization are allowable concepts.

  12. Suppose F(x) is a utility function and x2 represents a subset of goods broadly classified as food, then if F(x) is weakly separable we need only examine the optimization of f2(x2). The optimization of f2(x2) is constrained by not spending more on x2 than M2 which is the income allocated to total food consumption in the first budgeting stage (or the income remaining after optimization of expenditures on non-food goods).

  13. The useful result is that we can write the system of food demand equations as functions of the prices of food goods and the expenditure on food goods. That is, X2 = X(P2,M2) Does this mean that non-food good prices don’t matter in food demand? No, they would enter through their impact on M2 in the first stage budgeting. There is a constraint, however, because two prices from the same separable sub group would have the same effect on x2.

  14. Recall the Quadratic Flexible Functional Form F(x) = а0 + Σаifi(xi) + ½ΣΣβijfi(xi)fj(xj) where βij = βji  i ≠ j Weak Separability (i,j  Ir from k  Ir)

  15. i. Weak Separability says that the slope of the i-j space level curve is invariant to xk. It does not mean that xk won’t shift the level curve in the i-j space. ii. Implications for testing with QFFF’s. BPR, Pope and Hallam, and PFG. iii. Strong Separability i Ir, j  Is, and k  Ir  Is  F(x) = G(Σfi(xi)) Notes:

  16. b. Weak Separability and Substitution (read: Berndt and Christensen, RESTUD and J. of Econometrics) Consider weak separability of the cost function with respect to some partitions of prices.

  17. So, Which we know implies that:

  18. We can algebraically rearrange the previous condition for weak separability of the cost function to get: Now, if we multiply both sides by C/Ck we get the following condition on the Allen Elasticity of Substitution for weakly separable groups.

  19. What is the important conclusion? It is that weak separability of the cost (or expenditure) function ri and rj from rk implies equality of the Allen Elasticities of Substitution. Note, however, that this refers to substitution between inputs or goods in the partition Ir and those not in Ir, but it says nothing about substitution between inputs or goods that are both in Ir.

More Related