1 / 23

State Office of Risk Management Employment Practices Trends

State Office of Risk Management Employment Practices Trends. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Phil Norton President Professional Liability Division. July 26, 2011. Austin, Texas. Factors Influencing EPL Losses.

mark-wood
Download Presentation

State Office of Risk Management Employment Practices Trends

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. State Office of Risk ManagementEmployment Practices Trends Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Phil Norton President Professional Liability Division July 26, 2011 Austin, Texas

  2. Factors Influencing EPL Losses 1.The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act of 1990 and The Age of Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 2. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 3. The American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (effective 1992) 4. The Family and Medical Leave Act (1993) 5. The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Harris versus Forklift Systems, Inc. (November 3, 1993) • Class Action EPL Claims • Impact of Walmart/Dukes case

  3. EPL Perils to consider • Retaliation (including whistleblower) • Wrongful Termination (actual and constructive) • Breach of Employment Contract • Discrimination • Harassment (sexual and workplace, including bullying) • Failure to Employ/Promote/Educate • Wrongful Discipline or Wrongful Demotion • Failure to Grant Tenure • Negligent Evaluation • Invasion of Privacy and False Imprisonment • Employment Related Misrepresentation • Defamation or Employment Related Libel/Slander • Wrongful Infliction of Emotional Distress

  4. The Gallagher Database* on EPL Claims • Research on Public Information - not client data • Focus on Large Losses - $1MM or more • All Losses are Post-1991 [Civil Rights Act] • Mixture of Settlements and Verdicts • Jurisdiction also mixed: ½ State Courts; ½ Federal *Note: “Donation” to Advisen

  5. Large EPL Claims By Industry

  6. Large EPL Claims by Type of Claim

  7. Top 10 States for Large EPL Claims Note: numbers are percentages

  8. Punitive Damages & EPL Claims • About one-third of top $2.5 BL in large losses are due to punitive damages • Of largest 150 claims, about half have punitive damages awarded • Average percentage of full award that is punitive is about 35% for all large losses, but closer to 70%, if a punitive award is present

  9. Statutes & Law Supporting EPL Claims Title VII Age Discrimination in Employment Act Americans with Disabilities Act Pregnancy Discrimination Act Equal Pay Act Family and Medical Leave Act Title IX Federal Fair Labor Standards Act State Fair Employment Practice Statutes Whistleblower Laws Municipal Statutes and Regulations Breach of Contract Wrongful Termination Negligent and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Defamation Invasion of Privacy Tortious Interference with Contract Harassment Assault and Battery Negligent Hiring/Supervision Fraud and Misrepresentation Statutory Common Law

  10. Classic EPL Cases of Significance Texaco State Farm Publix Home Depot Triton Energy Walmart Denny’s Miller Brewing Proctor & Gamble Baker & McKenzie Tishman Construction Ashland Oil

  11. Trends in EPL Insurance • The EPL exposure, including potential for catastrophic loss, has increased significantly since 1991 • Pricing started high (1992/1993) then declined (1997), rose again (2001-2003) and then declined a few years before stabilizing into 2011 • Meanwhile, EPL coverage has been greatly improved: • sometimes packaged with Loss Control consulting • punitive damages covered • no downsizing exclusion • bilateral discovery offered • no “intentional acts” exclusion • simpler reporting requirements often available • flexible selection of defense firms may be possible • third-party claim coverage

  12. The EPL Marketplace Today • Cycle of Capacity starting to turn up • 1992 to 1997, 1998 to 2003, 2004 to 2009, 2010+ Note: Loss Ratios historically > 100% • Carriers took action in 2003 with: • Increased deductibles • Premium adjustments • Coverage fine-tuning Risk Management, Insurance and Loss Control are more important than ever!

  13. LOSS MITIGATION LOSS QUANTIFICATION POLICY ANALYSIS PROGRAM DESIGN • EEO- 1 review • Human Resources policies and procedures • Employee handbook • Cash on Balance Sheet • Inventories • Acquisition Strategy • Claim analysis for internal trends • Claim reporting procedures to carriers • Use of outside law firms • Gallagher Tools: • Loss Benchmarking • Limits Analysis • Loss Analysis • Exposure Modeling • Gap Analysis • Terms / Conditions • Program Updates • Contract Language Customization • State of the Market Design • Manuscript Wording Employment Practices Liability Strategic Planning RISKIDENTIFICATION

  14. Loss Quantification - EPL Limits Analysis Peer Analysis: Independent survey results. Loss Modeling: Proprietary model using EEO1 data, etc. Historical Review: Considers EPL claims settled. Suggested: A weighted average to estimate exposure.

  15. SampleEPL Exposure Models

  16. The EPL Insurance Policy • Who is covered? • Directors & Officers • All Full-time Employees • Temporary Employees and Volunteers • Independent Contractors • The Corporate Entity and Subsidiaries • Students (generally in a limited capacity)

  17. Who can bring covered claims? • Employees • Students • Applicants for hire • EEOC • State Agencies • Directors • Other individuals/entities acting on behalf

  18. Potential Exclusions Strikes, Lockouts Downsizing Willful or Malicious Intent Willful failure to comply with law M/A activity Bankruptcy Class Actions Deliberate Fraud Prior Notice W. A. R. N. Benefits Due Employment Contracts Work Comp Claims OSHA Securities Violations Wage & Hour Claims

  19. Some Coverages to Request • Punitive Damages • Back Pay • Front Pay • Pre/Post Judgment Interest • Nonmonetary or Injunctive Relief • No hammer on D&O; no more than 20% on EPL • Ensure Unemployment Filings don’t trigger exclusion thru P&P • Amend Subrogation Clause • Add minimal coverage for IP, Publishing, Wage & Hour • State Amendatory inconsistent • Extradition Coverage as applicable

  20. Coverage Triggers • Written Demand for Monetary Damages • Civil Proceeding • Arbitration Proceeding • Administrative Proceeding • Request for Toll of Statute of Limitations

  21. Defense and Settlement Considerations • Duty to Defend • Panel Counsel • Claims reporting threshold • Right to Settle (especially Hammer Clause) • Reporting – When and How

  22. Rating EPL - The Exposure Base • Number of Employees • U.S. versus Foreign • Full-time versus Part-time • Leased Employees • Students, if applicable • By state (especially CA, TX, and MI)

  23. Other EPL Underwriting Factors • The nature of the operations • EEO-1 report • Turnover • Percentage of highly paid employees • The quality of employment manuals and handbooks; the stated positions on the key practices and procedures • Financial Condition • M&A Activity • Policy Wording Considerations • Approach to Risk Management • Litigation/Loss History - Claims experience is essential!

More Related