1 / 33

Journalism in Africa 20 years on by Guy Berger

Journalism in Africa 20 years on by Guy Berger. Presentation to conference : World Press Freedom Day, 2011 Media in Africa 20 Years On: Our Past, Present and Future Windhoek 5 -6 May 2011. Whose point of view?. Journalists like to see journalists as heroes

Download Presentation

Journalism in Africa 20 years on by Guy Berger

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Journalism in Africa 20 years onby Guy Berger Presentation to conference: World Press Freedom Day, 2011 Media in Africa 20 Years On: Our Past, Present and Future Windhoek 5 -6 May 2011

  2. Whose point of view? • Journalists like to see journalists as heroes • Peers in state-owned media are propagandists • Govts like to see journalists as villains • Civil society sees them as flawed heroes • Audiences see some angels, some devils • What African journalists actually are depends on more than perspectives … • It also depends on the real standards at play…

  3. Coming up • The difference that a Declaration makes • What to look at since 1991 • Context • Capital • Capacity • Knowledge • Looking ahead

  4. An expanding trajectory • 1991: Issues central to newspapers • 2001: Windhoek+10 dealt with broadcasting • 2002: It fed into the broad Declaration of Principles of Freedom of Expression in Africa • 2011: Windhoek+20 on Sept 17-19 in Cape Town focuses on the right of access to information. • Can we do the same as with Windhoek?

  5. What’s in a declaration? • Question: why did Windhoek ‘91 invite printpeople? • Question: why was it editorial people, not owners? • Ans: the centrality of the journalistic ideal! • Though newspaper-originated, the “press” in the Declaration covers journalismmore broadly • It’s a declaration by journalists inspired by noble idealism of what journalism is and what it can do. • What did the Declaration“do”? • Ans: It set standards for optimum functioning of journalism

  6. What difference did it make? • It’s a gift of journalism freedom from Africa to the world: >100 countries marked World Press Freedom Day this year • What else? Independence & pluralism as standards. • What has been the impact of these standards in terms of the scope/role of journalism in Africa? • This presentation assesses 2 long decades of African journalistic performance against the standards. • Question: Is it the same old depressing story since 1991, or has African journalism become freer, even if not fully free?

  7. In overview • In summary since 1991: print conditions much improved; broadcast is better, ATI is lagging. • But if 2 steps forward were taken in the first decade since 91, the most recent decade has been 1 step back in many respects • So, are we going to continue going backwards? • And how will new media affect the prospects?

  8. 2. What to look at since 1991

  9. 2. What to look at since 1991 Windhoek’s standards: Context, Capital, Capacity & Knowledge • Context: • Free, independent, plural media institutions • Professional and economic freedoms • Capital: • Donor support and collaboration • Capacity: • Organisations, training, ethics • Knowledge: • Research is needed

  10. Holistic picture • Context, Capital, Capacity & Knowledge are all interdependent conditions if journalism is to play its fullest role in democracy and development • BUT: Context (political, legal, social) is clearly the most fundamental condition… • So, a conducive context is a necessary, though not a sufficient, condition for African journalism. • And the 1991 Declaration had some gaps that later initiatives have filled in…

  11. Expanding on Windhoek standards • Context: • ATI, broadcasting, technology • Capital: • serving marginalised groups • Capacity: • editorial independence, media support groups, self-regulation systems, local content, journalistic expertise, participation by outsiders • Knowledge: • news- and media- literacy.

  12. 3. Context: Political

  13. 3. Context: Political • More than 100 journoskilled in Africa since 1991 • Mainly in war-torn countries (Somalia) • BUT: Angola, Gambia, Burkina Faso • And many media closures: • DRC, Rwanda last year! • New media (SMS, Internet): Moz, Tunisia, Egypt • Multi-partyism has meant pro-press in rhetoric • In practice, governmental control – and attempts even in Benin and South Africa. • Verdict: widespread progress, but not guaranteed

  14. Context: Legal

  15. Context: Legal • Constitutions and enabling laws: could be more of them, and less vague provisions • Courts: playing a role, not always positive • Problematic laws still exist: • Criminal defamation • Lese majeste • Very slight improvements; missed opportunities • Licensing journalists: Zim, Botswana, Cameroon, but Nigerians have pushed back • Verdict: legal context is a mixed bag

  16. Broadcasting law • Liberalisation common – not national signals • Lack of independent regulation for licensing • Lack of public service requirements of licensees: especially to serve marginalised groups. • Neutrality of state-owned broadcast (& print) is not legally and institutionally enforced • Social context: there’s still a working culture of being government-service media • Verdict: pluralism yes, independence no.

  17. Context cntd: ATI, pan-African issues • 5 countries now have ATI laws (SA, Angola, Uganda, Ethiopia and Liberia). • Most states are still opaque, obstructive • Pan-African instruments are lacking. • One bright spot: ECOWAS court has played a role in regard to The Gambia torturing journalist Musa Saidykhan. • Verdict: these issues lag behind progress in other areas of context

  18. 4. Capital: the business basis

  19. 4. Capital: the business basis • Economic Freedom: States as predatory owners • Unfair competition and abuse of advertising power • Tough logistics and lack of finance • Support: donors,SAMDEF & MDDA have helped • Impact on journalism: • State-owned media chase money at the expense of public service; community media is too weak for journalism. • meanwhile there are tabloid successes • Limited Africa-wide expansion cases • Verdict: some limited progress

  20. 5. Capacity as a WindhkDecl standard

  21. 5. Capacity as a WindhkDecl standard • Achievements (CNN, Highway Africa awards) • Organisational capacity: some progress • Ethical capacity: • Many problems esp journalism-for-sale • Some improvements • Self-regulation is better understood • Media-support NGOs exist, though fragmented • Specialist journalism expertise is lacking • Gender and other sensitivity is lacking • Verdict: capacity has improved, but long way to go.

  22. 6. Knowledge

  23. 6. Knowledge • Understanding audiences: Pamro is a start • Business research is lacking (except SPI studies) • Academic research is scarce • Inventive creative experiments are few • Stakeholder knowledge of media and journalism is still much lacking (govts, owners, audiences… even journalists!) • Verdict: we know more than we did in ’91; but we also know how little that is!

  24. 7. Assessment • Some overall progress in context, capital, capacity, knowledge. • Data from Freedom House for the first decade: encouraging!

  25. BUT: decline over past decade • Increase in Not Free countries, decline in Free ones, and even fewer in the Partly Free category.

  26. 8. Looking ahead

  27. 8. Looking ahead • New media prospects: • Cellphones are coming of age as media devices • Smart STBs in Digital Broadcasting could be NB • Legacy media institutions need convergence. • So what? When the volume of comms increases, journalism can become harder to control… • But we need to be aware of co-option of telcos and ISPs as agents to be used against journalism

  28. Internet freedom in Africa

  29. Summing up Windhoek set standards that: • Showed that a government monopoly of comms does not meet a society’s interests in Africa • Opened the way for more media: private mainstream and community media Since then: • Uptake of tabloids and talk radio shows that the new pluralism was still not providing for society’s needs. • Developing uptake of new media will show that even free & plural legacy media are not enough.

  30. Journalism as a means to an end: • This logic continues to be valid and relevant.

  31. The next 20 years will see more media & even more communications.But: will we be able to get closer to the standards for optimum journalism? Thank you. G.Berger@ru.ac.za

More Related