1 / 7

Challenges for Building Mixed-Initiative Problem Solving Assistants John Lee - University of Iowa

Challenges for Building Mixed-Initiative Problem Solving Assistants John Lee - University of Iowa. Maintenance / Extensibility Standards / Interoperability Testing, Verification, Validation The empiricist view and the rationalist view.

Download Presentation

Challenges for Building Mixed-Initiative Problem Solving Assistants John Lee - University of Iowa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Challenges for Building Mixed-Initiative Problem Solving AssistantsJohn Lee - University of Iowa • Maintenance / Extensibility • Standards / Interoperability • Testing, Verification, Validation • The empiricist view and the rationalist view

  2. Challenges for Building Mixed-Initiative Problem Solving AssistantsJohn Lee - University of Iowa • Maintenance / Extensibility • Expansion to new paradigms… • Uncertainty • Time, Space, Events, Causality, Possession • Feedback / Learning / Improvement • User Modeling • Fault-Tolerance • Emotional Modeling

  3. Challenges for Building Mixed-Initiative Problem Solving AssistantsJohn Lee - University of Iowa • Standards / Interoperability • Domain independence • Application independence • Component reusability

  4. Challenges for Building Mixed-Initiative Problem Solving AssistantsJohn Lee - University of Iowa • Testing, Verification, Validation: • Observance of functionality • Absence of unwanted behavior • What are Design Requirements and what are Behavior Specifications?

  5. Scientific Views* • Rationalist View • Quest for Certainty and Completeness • Thought (Reasoning and Deduction) • Focus on Logical and Mathematical Models • Empiricist View • Uses what is known to develop knowledge • Generalizes based on partial knowledge * Peter Wegner. “Why Interaction is More Powerful Than Algorithms.” CACM-40-5, 1997

  6. Complexity of Human Interaction • Rationalist View • Create a specific protocol which will be complete and well-formed. • Force the human to use this protocol when interacting with an agent. • Bring the human from uncertainty to certainty by only accepting certain inputs in certain states. • Menu-driven selection

  7. Complexity of Human Interaction • Empiricist View • Use knowledge of human-human interaction to attempt to create specific behaviors. • Incorporate these behaviors into a protocol. • Allow the protocol to be incomplete. • Thus bringing the agent from certainty to uncertainty to avoid inhibiting the human’s expressiveness.

More Related