1 / 28

Lee Bryant , BlogTalk 2, July 2004 headshift lee@headshift

Informal, joined up knowledge sharing using connected weblogs in pursuit of Mental Health service improvement. Lee Bryant , BlogTalk 2, July 2004 http://www.headshift.com lee@headshift.com. What am I going to talk about?. Weblogs as personal and social knowledge sharing tools

maryfranco
Download Presentation

Lee Bryant , BlogTalk 2, July 2004 headshift lee@headshift

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Informal, joined up knowledge sharing using connected weblogs in pursuit of Mental Health service improvement Lee Bryant, BlogTalk 2, July 2004 http://www.headshift.com lee@headshift.com

  2. What am I going to talk about? • Weblogs as personal and social knowledge sharing tools • How to stimulate and support a social knowledge sharing network • Getting Started: identifying and encouraging potential blogging ‘voices’ in knowledge networks • How we support individual and collective modes within a social software-based knowledge community • Some observations on our methodology, conclusions & links Notes available on SubEthaEdit now, on the Wiki later or mail me….

  3. 1 :: Weblogs as personal and social knowledge sharing tools

  4. Some barriers to online knowledge sharing • Knowledge is a social construct-not just ‘content’ to be managed • Too focused on content creation vs. linking people • Formalityof systems, tools and process • Metadata/“Metacrap”- top-down view not user view • Divergent conceptual models of communication, KM,e-learning and other software • KM Software vendors lock us in tocommand and control systems, yet KM consultants speak of “knowledge ecology” and systems thinking

  5. Lessons from Social Software • Informality of weblogs / wikis encourages participation • Aggregation: manage feeds NOT content items • Bottom-upemergent metadata promotes self-representation and user involvement in categorisation • Weblogs and Wikis promote ‘loosely joined’ markup and linking culture rather than content recreation • Simple conceptual models for personal publishing

  6. Social Software is not just online social networks and weblogs, but loosely coupled software that is… • Social in the way it is conceived • Social in its purpose • Social in the way it behaves

  7. 2 :: How to stimulate and support a social knowledge sharing network in the real world

  8. Case Study: National Institute for Mental Health in England Aims: • cut across multiple, conflicting perspectives and interests • help people in different organisations & disciplines work together to improve mental health services & experiences. Key challenges: • Multiple perspectives - political issues of representation • Highly devolved organisation with roots locally, in the field • Low level of IT awareness and exposure beyond email & lists • Cultural ‘legacy’:long meetings, email-centric comms, etc. • Integration: their work involves multiple organisations

  9. A social engagement approach • Scope project --> map network --> define objectives together • Use a project weblog to learn their issues and language and to help teach them ours (knowledge transfer) • Participative design: let users shape their system • Patient seeding of Weblog-driven local ‘feeder’ sites to get early adopters blogging ‘close to home’ where comfortable • Developthe platform with pilot user groups • Phased launch from core users -> partners -> public • Training and support through events, demos, support

  10. Who are we trying to reach & why?

  11. Offline networking & communications Based on the target groups identified by the mapping, we undertook extensive offline networking among Mental Health professionals and service users to understand their content and interaction needs, and introduce people to blogging…

  12. 3 :: Getting started: identifying and encouraging potential blogging ‘voices’ in networked organisations

  13. Keep it local, keep it simple, keep it real • Setup ‘feeder’ blogs within local corporate Web sites • Train and mentor staff to allow direct posting to public sites • Prove benefits of open dialogue through user feedback • Aggregate upwards when they are ready - don’t scare them!

  14. Early wins: ‘feeder’ blogs www.nimhenorthwest.org.uk

  15. Early wins: ‘feeder’ blogs bme.nimhe.org.uk

  16. 4 :: … and then finally we build something

  17. The NIMHE knowledge community kc.nimhe.org.uk

  18. Understanding individual and group needs • For each network we try to understand individual and collective needs: what types of groups are best in each case? • This also drives a content plan to support groups with appropriateRSS, news & resource feeds

  19. Anatomy of a personal profile

  20. Personal Home Page

  21. Personal Weblog • Links to related classification nodes • Quick and easy posting • Syndicate via RSS or ‘grab’ using aggregator • Ability to bring in feeds from external blog • Links to groups you are part of

  22. Anatomy of a Group • Group Statement • Group weblog • Open space (wiki) • Directory • Aggregator • Categories • Events • Syndication • Admin • (Groups are public or private; both types by invitation or request only)

  23. Multi-faceted, multi-perspective metadata Faceted top-down metadata combined with emergent bottom-up

  24. Total aggregation & syndication • Every blog, person, org, classification node, saved search, etc has an XML feed and these can be combined into aggregated feeds & used outside the system

  25. 5 :: Some observations on our methodology, conclusions & links

  26. General observations • A balanced approach of networked individualism and free-style group forming can unleash dialogue and collective action • Manage feeds, not items: informal k-logs, feed aggregation and bottom-up metadata can help solve the content problem • Online social networking works best for a specific common purpose, not for its own sake • Engage with people on their own terms and build the network person by person, group by group • Embrace rather than deny complexity: ‘Small pieces, loosely joined’ is more resilient than command and control

  27. Summary of our methodology • Start with deep, embedded engagement - stimulate, challenge, educate; encourage personality & voices • Participative design: don’t just consult - let users design • ‘Feeder’ blogs can get early adopters blogging ‘close to home’ and grow outwards from there • Modular development of the platform using web services - throw away what doesn’t work and build on what does • Phased rollout: core users -> partners -> public • Training and support through events, demos, support • Solve real problems and make friends - don’t sell software

  28. Some Links • http://kc.nimhe.org.uk (invite only for now) • www.headshift.com/nimhekc (original Project Weblog with background docs) • www.nimhenorthwest.org.uk (active local feeder site) • www.nimhewm.org.uk (active local feeder site) • http://bme.nimhe.org.uk (public consultation weblog) • http://www.nimhe.org.uk (background on NIMHE) • http://modern.nhs.uk/improvementknowledge (collaboration site about improvement knowledge) • www.headshift.com/moments (headshift weblog)

More Related