1 / 46

Nuclear Fusion Energy- The role of the Plasma Focus

Nuclear Fusion Energy- The role of the Plasma Focus. S Lee & S H Saw Institute for Plasma Focus Studies INTI International University, Malaysia. International Workshop on Plasma Science & Applications, 27 & 28 October, Tehran, Iran. Outline of Talk. Energy crisis Fusion Energy

mcouture
Download Presentation

Nuclear Fusion Energy- The role of the Plasma Focus

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nuclear Fusion Energy- The role of the Plasma Focus S Lee & S H Saw Institute for Plasma Focus Studies INTI International University, Malaysia International Workshop on Plasma Science & Applications, 27 & 28 October, Tehran, Iran

  2. Outline of Talk • Energy crisis • Fusion Energy • The role of the Plasma Focus

  3. Scenario: World Population stabilizes at 10 billion; consuming energy at 2/3 US 1985 per capita rate Consumption Shortfall Supply Fossil, Hydro, fission

  4. Estimates of world energy production projected into the future in a scenario

  5. Fusion Temperature attained Fusion confinement one step away Needs x10 to reach ITER Needs another 2x to reach Power Plant

  6. Sizes of JET and ITER

  7. Unlimited clean energy supply • no need to restrict the growth of energy consumption, a better standard of living or the growth of population. Man can choose • Figure 5: energy consumption into the 22nd century. • Such unlimited growth (curve 4 of Figure 5) need not imply unbridled wasteful consumption. • The best practice of environmental conservatism could be incorporated into growth, so that • efficient and ‘green’ habits become part of the sustained culture of the human race.

  8. Figure 5: Scenario • Development of nuclear fusion energy is coming not a moment too soon. • The critical point when total available energy starts to decline is seen to be reached just before the middle of this century; • thereafter the consumption curve has to drop and • Man will have to cope with a decreasing supply • unless the increasing shortfall is made up by nuclear fusion energy

  9. Large scale Fusion Experiments • Tokamaks: Low density, long confinement plasmas • Laser Implosions: Super-dense, sub-nanosecond plasmas Smaller scale Fusion Experiments • Pinches: Dense, microsecond plasmas • Plasma Focus (PF) An advanced pinch system

  10. Superior method for dense pinches • The Plasma Focus producesexceptional densities and temperatures. • A simple capacitor discharge is sufficient to power the plasma focus.

  11. Plasma focus (PF) • Remarkably copious source of multiple radiations: x-rays, REBs, ions, plasma stream Hence many applications • Fusion neutrons even in table top devices • Same energy density over 7 orders of magnitude of energy storage 0.1J to 1 MJ • Neutron Yield scaling established

  12. THE PLASMA FOCUS (PF) • The PF is divided into two sections. • Pre-pinch (axial) section: Delays the pinch until the capacitor discharge current approaches peak value. • The pinch starts & occurs at top of the current pulse.

  13. 30 mF, 15 kV HV The Plasma Dynamics in Focus Radial Phase Axial Accelaration Phase Inverse Pinch Phase

  14. Radial Compression (Pinch) Phase of the Plasma Focus

  15. Dynamic Shock Wave process heats efficiently However the dynamic process also has limitations; as we will see Ultimately limits existing plasma focus in causing a yield scaling deterioration; as we shall see

  16. 300J portable (25 kg); 106 neutrons per shot fusion device-at NTU-NIE

  17. INTI UC Centre for Plasma Research-Plasma Focus & Pulse Power Laboratory 10 kV 2 Torr Neon Current: 120 kA Temperature: 2 million oC Soft x-ray burst: 100 Megawatt- 10 ns 23 June 2009 - First test shot of INTI-PF

  18. 1997 ICDMP (International Centre for Dense Magnetised Plasmas) Warsaw-now operates one of biggest plasma focus in the world, the PF1000

  19. Scaling Properties 3 kJ machine Small Plasma Focus 1000 kJ machine Big Plasma Focus

  20. Same Energy Density in small and big PF devices leads to: • Scalability • constant speed factor, [(I/a)/r1/2] for all machines, big or small lead to same plasma energy density • from 0.1 to 1000 kJ of storage energy • predictable yield of radiation Constant speed factor also leads to constant dynamic resistance, which causes present generation PF’s to suffer scaling deterioration, or neutron saturation- more about this later

  21. One of most exciting properties of plasma focus is its neutron yield Yn • Early experiments show: Yn~E02 • Prospect was raised in those early research years that, breakeven could be attained at several tens of MJ . • However quickly shown that as E0 approaches 1 MJ, a neutron saturation effect was observed; Yn does not increase as much as expected, as E0 was progressively raised towards 1 MJ. • Question: Is there a fundamental reason for Yn saturation?

  22. Chart from M Scholz (November 2007 ICDMP)purported to show neutron saturation

  23. Global Scaling LawScaling deterioration observed in numerical experiments (small black crosses) compared to measurements on various machines (larger coloured crosses) Neutron ‘saturation’ is more accurately portrayed as a scaling deterioration-Conclusion of IPFS-INTI UC research • S Lee & S H Saw, J Fusion Energy, 27 292-295 (2008) • S Lee, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 50 (2008) 105005 • S H Saw&S Lee. Scaling the plasma focus for fusion energy. Nuclear & Renewable Energy Sources Ankara, Turkey, 28 & 29 September 2009. • S Lee Appl Phys Lett 95, 151503 (2009)

  24. At IPFS, we have shown that: constancy of axial phase dynamic resitance leads to current ‘saturation’ as E0 is increased by increasing C0. Tendency to saturate occurs before 1 MJ From both numerical experiments as well as from accumulated laboratory data (D-D): Yn= 3x1011Ipinch4.5 Yn= 2x1010Ipeak3.8 Hence the ‘saturation’ of Ipeak leads to saturation of neutron yield Yn

  25. Scaling for large Plasma Focus Targets: • IFMIF (International fusion materials irradiation facility)-level fusion wall materials testing

  26. Fusion Wall materials testing at the mid-level of IFMIF: 1015 D-T neutrons per shot, 1 Hz, 1 year for 0.1-1 dpa- Gribkov

  27. Fast capacitor bank 10x PF1000-Fully modelled- 1.5x1015 D-T neutrons per shot • Operating Parameters: 35kV, 14 Torr D-T • Bank Parameters: L0=33.5nH, C0=13320uF, r0=0.19mW • E0=8.2 MJ • Tube Parameters: b=35.1 cm, a=25.3 cm z0=220cm • Ipeak=7.3 MA, Ipinch=3.0 MA • Model parameters 0.13, 0.65, 0.35, 0.65

  28. Ongoing IPFS numerical experiments of Multi-MJ Plasma Focus

  29. 50 kV modelled- 1.2x1015 D-T neutrons per shot • Operating Parameters: 50kV, 40 Torr D-T • Bank Parameters: L0=33.5nH, C0=2000uF, r0=0.45mW • E0=2.5 MJ • Tube Parameters: b=20.9 cm, a=15 cm z0=70cm • Ipeak=6.7 MA, Ipinch=2.8 MA • Model parameters 0.14, 0.7, 0.35, 0.7

  30. IFMIF-scale device • Numerical Experiments suggests the possibility of scaling the PF up to IFMIF mid-scale with a PF1000-like device at 50kV and 2.5 MJ at pinch current of 2.8MA

  31. Scaling further- possibilities • 1. Increase E0, however note: scaling deteriorated already below Yn~E0 • 2. Increase voltage, at 50 kV beam energy ~150kV already past fusion x-section peak; further increase in voltage, x-section decreases, so gain is marginal • Need technological advancement to increase current per unit E0 and per unit V0. • We next extrapolate from point of view of Ipinch

  32. Scaling Plasma Focus from Ipinch using present predominantly beam-target in Lee Model code

  33. 1.Using above Fig compute Pout at 1 Hz assume efficiency 0.32. Then compute E0 budget to generate the required Ipinch at each point; so as to get Q=2

  34. What we need for Focus fusion energy based on D-T (note: 1 D-T neutron has 14.1 MeV of KE) Choose 24 MA point from above graph: Ipinch : 24 MA D-T n from scaling: 3x1019 Kinetic energy: 64 MJ Rep rate: 1 shot per second Then Pfusion (0.3 efficiency): 20 MW If E0=10MJ; input power at 1 Hz 10 MW Net Power 10 MW Technical Requirement: Ipinch= 24MA using E0=10MJ; Rep rate required: 1 Hz

  35. Thermonuclear Plasma Focus • Reason why PF fusion is beam-target is PF temp not high enough. • If use additional external heating from present 1 keV to 10 0r 20 keV, then Yth is dominant

  36. Thermonuclear Plasma Focus

  37. Thermonuclear fusion in PF with additional heating: Tech. Targets • Select a point from Fig 3 for discussion • 10MA point at 20keV gives 3x10^19 D-T n /shot • This is equivalent to (Fig 1) b-t at 24 MA • At 1 Hz eff 0.3 (Fig 2) gives 20 MW • If require Q=2 (ie net power of 10 MW) • TechnologicalTargets: 4 MJ to generate 10MA 6 MJ to provide additional heating to 20keV

  38. Plasma Focus Reactors Beam-target regime improvement in technology is required: to generate 24 MA pinch current from 10MJ at 30kV Thermonuclear regime: plasma focus operation; with 10 MA from 3.5 MJ, no High voltage limit then use additional heating (6 MJ budget) to reach 20 keV Enhancement techniques: Radiative collapse induced by Kr or Xe doping Current injection using current-steps or beam injection

  39. Radiative collapse increases number density • Yield proportional to n2, volume and duration • n2 ~ rmin-6 • Volume x duration ~ rmin4 • Thus yield ~ rmin-2; if compression increased 100 times, yield increases 10,000 times • Present radiative collapse involves hot spots containing only small proportion of pinch particles • Need gross (column) collapse

  40. Pease & Braginskii postulated that D pinch may undergo radiative collapse at 1.6 MA (so-called P-B current)Krypton PF undergoes collapse much more easily, even below 105K, due to increased 1.thermodynamic degrees of freedom and 2. radiative degrees of freedom • Our model code includes thermodynamic effects and radiative effects coupled to the dynamics. • Thus radiative collapse is demonstrated in the numerical experiments

  41. Numerical Experiments on 3 kJ PF demonstrating pinch column undergoing radiative collapse at optimum presssures 0.1 Torr 0.5 Torr 0.9 Torr 1.1 Torr

  42. Small (3kJ) PF Pinch undergoing column radiative collapse at pinch currents as low as 80 kA

  43. Kr- doped deuterium PF shows order of magnitude neutron yield enhancement • To learn to utilize this effect for large PF yield enhancment through radiative cooling and collapse

  44. Conclusion: Tokamak programme is moving steadily towards harnessing nuclear fusion energy as a limitless clean energy source for the continuing progress of civilisation Alternative and smaller scale experiments will also play a role in this most challenging technological development – eg in neutron source at level of IFMIF Scaling towards fusion reactor regimes is discussed; dependent upon technological advancement in production of larger currents from a budget of stored energy Compression enhancement from radiative collapse of Kr-doped D-T PF also being experimented with numerically.

  45. Nuclear Fusion Energy- The role of the Plasma Focus S Lee & S H Saw Institute for Plasma Focus Studies INTI International University, Malaysia International Workshop on Plasma Science & Applications, 27 & 28 October, Tehran, Iran

More Related