1 / 17

Farley Ishaak, Ron van Schie & Jan de Haan

Farley Ishaak, Ron van Schie & Jan de Haan. Luxembourg, January 20 th 2019. Single Purpose Entities and their role in Commercial Property Price Indicators. Introduction to SPEs Methodology Why do investors utilize SPEs? How do investors utilize SPEs?

megant
Download Presentation

Farley Ishaak, Ron van Schie & Jan de Haan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Farley Ishaak, Ron van Schie & Jan de Haan Luxembourg, January 20th 2019 Single Purpose Entities and their role in Commercial Property Price Indicators

  2. Introduction to SPEs • Methodology • Why do investors utilize SPEs? • Howdo investors utilize SPEs? • Whatis the magnitude of SPE transactions? • Preliminary conclusions • Content Work in progress

  3. Company A • Introduction to SPEs Ownership Registered as property transfer Transfer (asset deal) Company B

  4. Company A • Introduction to SPEs Ownership Registered as company transfer (share deal) Ownership Company X Transfer Company B Single PurposeEntity

  5. Introduction to SPEs Definition: “An SPE refers to a legal entity that is created to satisfy a specific purpose (holding real estate)” (Seligman & Stein, 2004; Rixon, 2012; Arden, Keller & Lewis, 2017) Should share deals be considered in scope of a CPPI? It would seem logical that entities engaging in the same activities, should be treated essentially the same.

  6. Introduction to SPEs Interchangeable terms: • Special Purpose Entity • Single Asset Entity • Special Purpose Vehicle Similar terms: • Straw corporation • Nominee corporation • Bankruptcy Remote Entity • Bankruptcy Proof Entity

  7. Methodology Research in progress… Why and how do investors utilize SPEs? > Literature review > Expert interviews What is the magnitude of SPE transactions? > Data research: Chamber of Commerce, Land Registry Office, Tax authority and Real estate consultancies

  8. Why do investors utilize SPEs? Legal → SPEs are formed to reallocate liabilities(obstacles to bankruptcy) Risk considerations buyer: depends on organizational complexity Tax → SPE transactions may or may not be subject to tax. Financial considerations buyer and seller: depends on applicable income and transfer tax regulations Privacy → SPEs contribute to an owners anonymity Image considerations buyer and seller: depends on buyers/sellers anonymity preferences

  9. Company A • How do investors utilize SPEs? Ownership Ownership Company X Transfer Company B Should share deals be considered in scope of a CPPI?

  10. Company A • How do investors utilize SPEs? Ownership Company W Company X Company Y Company Z Transfer Company B Should share deals be considered in scope of a CPPI?

  11. Company A Ownership 25% Transfer • How do investors utilize SPEs? Company X Company B Company E Company D Company C 25% 25% 25% Should share deals be considered in scope of a CPPI?

  12. Ownership Multipurpose Entity Company A • How do investors utilize SPEs? SPE Company X Transfer Transfer back Company B Non real estate assets Should share deals be considered in scope of a CPPI?

  13. How do investors utilize SPEs? To what extent should we consider share deals as part of a CPPI? All None Economic perspective All share deals Legal perspective Only asset deals Tax authority perspective Defined set of share deals

  14. Preliminary conclusions Implications • Incoherence between countries due to differences in legislation/tax regulations. • Possible structural breaks in time series. • There are complex share deal constructions that should probably not be included in a CPPI. • The in- or exclusion of share deals could differ between data sources.

  15. Preliminary conclusions The way forward • There is a need to determine and harmonize the scope of a commercial property transaction. • We should eventually come up with clear and practically feasible thresholds for considering an event as a commercial property transaction.

More Related