1 / 110

Create Actionable Data for Schools

Create Actionable Data for Schools. July 16-26 2012 Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit and Mr. Nelson Suarez Curriculum and Instruction. Day 1 Topics. Day 2 Topics. Assumptions:. You. NORMS. Http://osi.dadeschools.net/actiondata. Update on Assessments. Math at a Glance.

michaelmhughes
Download Presentation

Create Actionable Data for Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Create Actionable Data for Schools July 16-26 2012 Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit and Mr. Nelson Suarez Curriculum and Instruction

  2. Day 1 Topics

  3. Day 2 Topics

  4. Assumptions: You...

  5. NORMS

  6. Http://osi.dadeschools.net/actiondata

  7. Update on Assessments

  8. Math at a Glance

  9. 2012 Math District and State Results% Scoring Achievement Level 3 and Above +2 +2 +1 -3 -4 -1 % ofStudents

  10. 2011 to 2012 Math Results% Scoring Achievement Level 3 and Above +2 +2 +1 0 0 +1 % ofStudents +1 +2 +4 +3 +1 +2 % of Students

  11. Understanding FCAT 2.0/EOC Reports? Understanding FCAT 2.0 and EOC Reports, Spring 2012

  12. FCAT 2.0 Scores Reading/Math 1996 SSS 2007 NGSSS Base scale of FCAT Base scale of FCAT 2.0 FCAT 1999 FCAT 2001 2011 FCAT 2.0 Equivalent Scores FCAT 2002 FCAT 2010

  13. FCAT 2.0 Scores, Reading/math FCAT 2.0 2014 FCAT 2.0 2013 FCAT 2.0 2012 FCAT 2.0 2011 2010-11 Baseline Year (Retrofitted Scores)

  14. FCAT 2.0 Reading-Math Scores Raw Score Content Area Scores Developmental Scale Score (DSS)(140 to 302 R: G3-10) (140 to 298 M: G3-8) Achievement Level(1 to 5)

  15. Sample Math Report, Grade 3-4 32 31

  16. Developmental Scale Score (Math) G6 G3 G8 Min Max Raw Score 140 Developmental Scale Scores 298 Grade 3 Grade 10

  17. 2012 FCAT 2.0 Mathematics - DistrictMean Developmental Scale Score (Matched Students) Developmental Scale Scores Grades

  18. 2012 FCAT 2.0 Mathematics - DistrictMean Developmental Scale Score (DSS)

  19. 2012 FCAT 2.0 Possible Points, Grades 3-5 Mathematics Reporting Category

  20. 2012 FCAT 2.0 Possible Points, Grades 6-8 Mathematics Reporting Category

  21. Algebra 1 EOC Scores Raw Score Algebra Content Scores EOC Scale Score(325 - 475) Achievement Level(1 to 5) Source: FL DOE/Office of Assessment

  22. Sample Algebra 1 Report 15 15

  23. Geometry EOC Scores Raw Score Content Scores T-Score Scale(20 to 80) Statewide Comparison by Thirds

  24. 2012 Geometry EOC Scale Distribution - Statewide

  25. Statewide Comparison Points Earned by Content Area Test Form Scale Score 1 2 3 Student Name and ID

  26. End-of-Course

  27. FCAT 2.0/EOC Achievement Level Policy Definitions

  28. FCAT 2.0/EOC Achievement Level Policy Definitions FCAT FCAT 2.0 and EOC

  29. Worksheet 1: Calculate the % correct for each content area.

  30. Worksheet 1: Calculate the % correct for each content area.

  31. Use Excel for Data Analysis • At the FLDOE website (Select one grade), download School Scores for All Curriculum Groups • Save the file on the desktop and open the file • Apply Filter to column header • Filter out District number 13 • Delete all rows below the state row • Clear filter from “District Number” • Apply Freeze panes to appropriate cell • Copy reporting categories name to new empty cell • Apply filter to column header including the new ones • Calculate Average % Correct for each reporting category • Sample formula: =N11/N$10*100 • Apply formula to all cells

  32. Grade ______ Assessment:___________ Data Analysis Worksheet 2

  33. Update on School Grades

  34. Florida School Accountability

  35. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Benchmark

  36. AYP 39 Components Criteria (NA, No, Yes)

  37. Annual Measurable Objectives

  38. Transition from AYP to AMO

  39. AMO vs. Differentiated Accountability

  40. Target Performance for AMO-2

  41. AMO Performance Targets: 2010-11 to 2016-17 The goal of AMO-2 is to reduce the % of non-proficient by 50% over six years (2010-11 to 2016-17). • 70% 50% of 70 = 35 35÷6 = 5.83

  42. AMO Performance Targets: 2010-11 to 2016-17 The goal of AMO-2 is to reduce the % of non-proficient by 50% over six years (2010-11 to 2016-17). • 40% 50% of 40 = 20 20÷6 = 3.33

  43. Worksheet 3: AMO-2 Target

  44. Worksheet 3: AMO-2 Target

  45. OSI Website -- Http://osi.dadeschools.net

  46. Annual Measurable Objective (AMO)

More Related