Airline Community Views-FABEC

1. TO REPLACE IMAGE: • Click on the picture, hit Delete • Click the ‘Add Picture’ icon • Find your image & click ‘Insert’ • Under the ‘Format’ tab, click the ‘Crop’ button to adjust the position within the shape • ** In order for the ‘Crop’ button to appear, please make sure you keep the shape selected at all times Airline Community Views-FABEC FABEC RP3 Performance Plan R. Sergison

2. RP2 Progress • Performance targets for Environment and capacity not met • Significant underspending of determined cost in RP2 by EUR -382m • Significant economic surplus from en-route activity EUR 373m • What are the FABEC deliverables in terms of enhanced cooperation and integration across borders? • Increased cooperation? • Integration of human and technical resources? • Why continue? What will change?

3. TEXT FORMATTING / LIST LEVELS • To change the text formatting or list level: • Highlight the paragraph or sentence • From the Home tab, select the ’Increase List Level’ button • Click the button once to remove the blue subtitle • Click again to add the first level bullet point etc • To go back a level, use the ‘Decrease List Level’ button General Observations - Draft RP3 PP • Same borders, same routes, same roles – MORE COST • Cost developments lack transparent justification and CBAs • Unconsolidated plan, e.g. investments • “Planning to Fail” • Lacks transparency • Compensation approach when a Performance approach is needed • Airspace users are losing trust

4. TEXT FORMATTING / LIST LEVELS To change the text formatting or list level: • Highlight the paragraph or sentence • From the Home tab, select the ’Increase List Level’ button • Click the button once to remove the blue subtitle • Click again to add the first level bullet point etc • To go back a level, use the ‘Decrease List Level’ button Safety • The intention to meet the EU Wide Safety Targets is strongly supported • Some data sharing to date, but no identified synergies leading to cost-efficient or more effective oversight/ application • EoSM, RAT (GND/ OVL), JC progressing at different speeds • Transparency of individual NSA and ANSP proposal needed

5. TEXT FORMATTING / LIST LEVELS • To change the text formatting or list level: • Highlight the paragraph or sentence • From the Home tab, select the ’Increase List Level’ button • Click the button once to remove the blue subtitle • Click again to add the first level bullet point etc • To go back a level, use the ‘Decrease List Level’ button Environment • KEA target not in line with Reference Values is strongly opposed • ANSPs must keep building efficient airspace and watering down environmental targets will increase CO2 emissions. • Figures do not reflect abolishing mitigation measures in 2021 due to investments/promised ATCO availability • Projects planned in order to deliver must be prioritized • Historical performance suggests little confidence in FABEC to deliver • Robust plan and commitment at ANSP and state level is essential

6. TEXT FORMATTING / LIST LEVELS To change the text formatting or list level: • Highlight the paragraph or sentence • From the Home tab, select the ’Increase List Level’ button • Click the button once to remove the blue subtitle • Click again to add the first level bullet point etc • To go back a level, use the ‘Decrease List Level’ button Capacity • Enroute ATFM delay not in line with Reference Value is strongly opposed • Proposed value for 2020 is 5 times the reference value • 400% deterioration • Does not reflect 2019 reality and removal of mitigation measures in 2021 due to investments/promised ATCO availability etc. NM delay predictions are over-estimated as a baseline. • Current investment and costs increase is sufficient to close the capacity gap. • Projects planned to deliver are not identified

7. Incentives • CRSTMP limitation is not supported • In the case of FABEC a Penalty only scheme should be developed to manage performance • Achievement of both FAB and individual State targets must the priority, this will drive the changes required by Airlines • Current Incentive Scheme targets not supported as its actually rewards underperformance. Bonus should be only allowed if there is a real improvement and targets are challenging enough.

8. Cost Efficiency • Proposed cost increases are disproportionally high compared to weak capacity and environmental targets. • DC must be properly managed to achieve DUC in line with EU-wide target • EU-wide target currently not met based on available information. • Issues with pensions and extremely favorable conditions to staff need to be addressed. • Capex must be adjusted for RP2 underspend, transparent, justified by robust CBA and phased to reflect historical performance • Poor transparency

9. TEXT FORMATTING / LIST LEVELS To change the text formatting or list level: • Highlight the paragraph or sentence • From the Home tab, select the ’Increase List Level’ button • Click the button once to remove the blue subtitle • Click again to add the first level bullet point etc • To go back a level, use the ‘Decrease List Level’ button Next Steps • The AUs want very much for FABEC to succeed • FABEC is desperately lacking ambition and a real plan • Rationalize infrastructure across FABEC • Consolidate support functions across FABEC • Potential to move more sectors to MUAC – vertical and lateral • Can’t or won’t do it – break-up FABEC

10. TO REPLACE IMAGE: • Click on the picture, hit Delete • Click the ‘Add Picture’ icon • Find your image & click ‘Insert’ • Under the ‘Format’ tab, click the ‘Crop’ button to adjust the position within the shape • ** In order for the ‘Crop’ button to appear, please make sure you keep the shape selected at all times Thank you • Rory Sergison • sergisonr@iata.org • www.iata.org