1 / 5

3.3 Closure Properties of Regular Languages

3.3 Closure Properties of Regular Languages. Given regular languages L 1 and L 2 , we will show that L 1  L 2 , L 1  L 2 , the complement of L 1 and L 1 L 2 are regular. Sometimes, we can apply the closure properties to show some sets are not regular.

miette
Download Presentation

3.3 Closure Properties of Regular Languages

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 3.3 Closure Properties of Regular Languages Given regular languages L 1 and L 2, we will show that L 1 L 2, L 1 L 2, the complement of L 1and L 1\ L 2 are regular. Sometimes, we can apply the closure properties to show some sets are not regular. Theorem 3 : Regular languages are closed under union operation and Kleene star operation. Proof: If L 1 and L 2 are regular, then there are regular expressions r 1 and r 2denoting the languages L 1 and L 2 ,respectively. (r 1+ r 2)and (r 1*) are regular expressions denoting the languages L 1 L 2 and L 1*. Therefore, L 1 L 2 and L 1* are regular.

  2. Theorem 4 : Regular languages are closed under complement operation and intersection operation. Proof: Suppose that L 1 and L 2 are regular over an alphabet . There is a DFA M=(Q, , , q 0, F) accepting L 1. Design a DFA M’ = (Q, , , q 0, F’), where F’ = Q \ F. Now, we have that L(M’) = * \ L 1. Hence, the complement of L 1is regular. Let L 1’ = * \ L 1 and L 2’ = * \ L 2. The complement of L 1’  L 2’ is regular and is equal to L 1 L 2 . Hence L 1 L 2 is regular.

  3. The proof of regular languages are closed under intersection operation can be done by construct a new DFA to accept the intersection. The construction is as follows. Suppose that L 1 and L 2 are regular languages accepted by DFA’s M 1=(Q 1, ,  1, q 0 1, F 1) and M 2 =(Q 2, ,  2, q 0 2, F 2) such that L(M 1) = L 1 and L(M 2 )= L 2. Construct a DFA M= (Q, , , q 0, F), where Q = Q 1  Q 2, q 0 = (q 0 1, q 0 2), F = F 1 F 2, and ((p i, q s), a) = ( 1(p i, a),  2(q s, a)). It is not difficult to show that L(M) = L 1 L 2.

  4. Example 9: Let L = {  {0, 1}* | the number of 0’s in  is equal to the number of 1’s in }. Show that L is not regular. Solution : Assume that L were regular. Let L’ = L  L(0 + 1 +). L’ = { 0 i1 i | i > 0 }. Since L and L (0 + 1 +) are regular, we have that L’ is regular. By example 6 in section 3.2 we know that L’ is not regular , a contradiction. Therefore, L is not regular.

  5. Example 10: Let L = {0 k | k is a composite integer}. Show that L is not regular. Solution : Let L’ = {0 k | k is a prime integer}. Then L = {0}* \ L’ \ {0}. Assume that L’ were regular. Let n be the constant in the pumping lemma. Choose = 0 s, where s = p n, p n is the nth prime number . Let = xyz, where |xy|  n and |y|  1. Hence, x = 0 |x| and y = 0 |y|. Consider the case that i = p n+ 1, |xy i z| = p n + p n |y| = p n (|y|+1), not a prime number. Hence, contradict to that L’ is regular. Therefore, L is not regular.

More Related