1 / 25

Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP)

Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP) Overview. Society for Information Management (SIM) April 13, 2005. Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP). Agenda. SSTP Overview Wisconsin Legislation Federal Legislation Technology Pending Issues. Who’s Involved. 45 States & DC impose sales tax

Download Presentation

Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP) Overview Society for Information Management (SIM) April 13, 2005 Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP)

  2. Agenda • SSTP Overview • Wisconsin Legislation • Federal Legislation • Technology • Pending Issues

  3. Who’s Involved • 45 States & DC impose sales tax • 42 States & DC involved in SSTP • 21 States enacted conforming legislation • Business community

  4. What it does - - Rules • State level administration of local sales and use taxes • Common state and local tax bases within a state after December 31, 2005 • Uniform sourcing rules: destination based

  5. What it does - - Rules • Menu of uniform definitions -- legislatures decide what is taxable or exempt • Simplified exemption processing • Rate simplification with databases • No caps and thresholds after December 31, 2005

  6. What it does - - Rules • Limited scope audits and certification standards • Joint audits for large, multi-state businesses • Hold harmless provisions if use data bases • Uniform return

  7. What it does - - Rules • Sales tax holidays (guidelines and limited defined products) • One rounding rule • Common customer refund procedures • State funding of technology

  8. Wisconsin Legislation -- Governor’s Budget Bill • Adopt uniform definitions • Adopt sourcing rules • Adopt exemption administration provisions (e.g., relieve seller from burden of proof)

  9. Wisconsin Legislation -- Governor’s Budget Bill • Adopt hold harmless provisions for sellers and providers who uses the state’s taxability matrix and rate/jurisdiction database • Effective October 1, 2005 (interstate agreement on January 1, 2006)

  10. Federal Legislation • H.R. 3184 introduced 9-25-03 • S. 1736 introduced 10-15-03 • Authorization to require collection if adopt provisions of Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement • Small business exception • Reasonable seller compensation

  11. Technology Implementation • Central registration system • Database matching rate to zip codes • Taxability matrix

  12. Technology Implementation • Model 1 - Certified Service Provider (CSP) • Model 2 - Certified Automated System (CAS) • Model 3 - Certification of In-house (Proprietary) System • Continue with system “as is”

  13. Model 1 - Certified Service Provider (CSP) • States contract with CSPs • States test and certify CSP’s systems • States compensate CSPs • Retailer selects CSP to perform all sales tax functions • CSP determines tax due, pays the tax to the states, and files the return with the states

  14. Model 1 - Certified Service Provider (CSP) • CSP is liable for tax due with two exceptions: • errors by the states • fraud by the retailer • CSP is subject to audit and periodic system checks • Retailer subject to audit on purchases (use tax)

  15. Model 2 - Certified Automated Systems (CAS) • Retailer selects CAS from those available • Retailer establishes an interface with CAS • CAS performs calculation of tax due • States compensate retailer for use of CAS

  16. Model 2 - Certified Automated Systems (CAS) • Person/company who obtained certification of CAS from states is liable for failure of CAS • Person/company who obtained certification of CAS is not liable for errors by states • Retailer is liable for paying tax due and accuracy of returns

  17. Model 2 - Certified Automated Systems (CAS) • CAS subject to periodic system checks • Retailer subject to audit on tax remittance and return filing • Retailer subject to audit on purchases (use tax)

  18. Certification of CSPs and CASs by Governing Board • Contract between Governing Board of states and CSPs • Certification of CASs for determining state and local sales and use tax rates, determining whether an item is taxable or exempt, any other requirement set by Governing Board

  19. Compensation • Model 1 - Monetary allowance to CSP per contract • Model 2 - All retailers will receive a base rate for a period not to exceed 24 months following commencement of participation by a retailer

  20. Compensation • Retailers using Model 1 (CSPs) will not get vendor discounts otherwise provided in state law • Retailers using Model 2 (CAS) will get vendor discounts otherwise provided in state law

  21. Time Line - Model 1 Certified Service Providers (CSPs) • Proposals due on 1-3-2005 • Initial approvals 2-15-05 • Certification process completed 8-15-05 • Tentative awards 8-15-05 • Negotiations completed 10-01-05 • Final contracts 10-31-05

  22. Time Line - Model 2 Certified Automated Systems (CASs) • Some CSPs will provide CASs • Other CASs will be certified after CSPs certified

  23. Pending Issues • Certificates of compliance • Governing Board on July 1, 2005 • Interstate agreement on October 1, 2005 • Voluntary collections begin October 1, 2005

  24. Pending Issues • Telecommunication definitions • Bundling rules • Exemption processes • Digital equivalent definitions

  25. Contacts www@dor.state.wi.us www@streamlinedsalestax.org dhardt@dor.state.wi.us

More Related