1 / 18

Fi8000 Valuation of Financial Assets

Fi8000 Valuation of Financial Assets. Spring Semester 2010 Dr. Isabel Tkatch Assistant Professor of Finance. Risk, Return and Portfolio Theory. Risk and risk aversion Utility theory and the intuition for risk aversion Mean-Variance (M-V or μ - σ ) criterion

moira
Download Presentation

Fi8000 Valuation of Financial Assets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fi8000Valuation ofFinancial Assets Spring Semester 2010 Dr. Isabel Tkatch Assistant Professor of Finance

  2. Risk, Return and Portfolio Theory • Risk and risk aversion • Utility theory and the intuition for risk aversion • Mean-Variance (M-V or μ-σ) criterion • The mathematics of portfolio theory • Capital allocation and the optimal portfolio • One risky asset and one risk-free asset • Two risky assets • n risky assets • n risky assets and one risk-free asset • Equilibrium in capital markets • The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) • Market Efficiency

  3. Reward and Risk: Assumptions • Investors prefer more money (reward) to less: all else equal, investors prefer a higher reward to a lower one. • Investors are risk averse: all else equal, investors dislike risk. • There is a tradeoff between reward and risk: Investors will take risks only if they are compensated by a higher reward.

  4. Reward and Risk ☺ Reward ☺ Risk

  5. Quantifying Rewards and Risks • Reward – a measure of wealth • The expected (average) return • Risk • Measures of dispersion - variance • Other measures • Utility – a measure of welfare • Represents preferences • Accounts for both reward and risk

  6. Quantifying Rewards and Risks The mathematics of portfolio theory (1-3)

  7. Comparing Investments:an example Which investment will you prefer and why? • A or B? • B or C? • C or D? • C or E? • D or E? • B or E, C or F (C or E, revised)? • E or F?

  8. Comparing Investments:the criteria • A vs. B – If the return is certain look for the higher return (reward) • B vs. C – A certain dollar is always better than a lottery with an expected return of one dollar • C vs. D – If the expected return (reward) is the same look for the lower variance of the return (risk) • C vs. E – If the variance of the return (risk) is the same look for the higher expected return (reward) • D vs. E – Chose the investment with the lower variance of return (risk) and higher expected return (reward) • B vs. E or C vs. F (or C vs. E) – stochastic dominance • E vs. F – maximum expected utility

  9. Comparing Investments Maximum return If the return is risk-free (certain), all investors prefer the higher return Risk aversion Investors prefer a certain dollar to a lottery with an expected return of one dollar

  10. Comparing Investments Maximum expected return If two risky assets have the same variance of the returns, risk-averse investors prefer the one with the higher expected return Minimum variance of the return If two risky assets have the same expected return, risk-averse investors prefer the one with the lower variance of return

  11. The Mean-Variance Criterion Let A and B be two (risky) assets. All risk-averse investors prefer asset A to B if { μA ≥ μB and σA < σB } or if { μA > μB and σA ≤ σB } Note that we can apply this rule only if we assume that the distribution of returns is normal.

  12. The Mean-Variance Criterion(M-V or μ-σ criterion) ☺ E(R) = μR ☺ STD(R) = σR

  13. Other Criteria The basic intuition is that we care about “bad” surprises rather than all surprises. In fact dispersion (variance) may be desirable if it means that we may encounter a “good” surprise. When we assume that returns are normally distributed the expected-utility and the stochastic-dominance criteria result in the same ranking of investments as the mean-variance criterion.

  14. The Normal Distribution of Returns Pr(R) 68% 95% μ- 2σ μ μ+σ μ+2σ μ- σ R

  15. The Normal Distribution of Returns Pr(Return) σR: Risk μR: Reward 0 R=Return

  16. The Normal DistributionHigher Reward (Expected Return) Pr(Return) μB μA < R=Return

  17. The Normal DistributionLower Risk (Standard Deviation) Pr(Return) A σA < σB B μA= μB R=Return

  18. Practice problems BKM Ch. 6: 7th edition: 1,13,14, 34; 8th edition : 4,13,14, CFA-8. Mathematics of Portfolio Theory: Read and practice parts 1-5.

More Related