1 / 37

Pricing Arrangements: Choose Your Contract Type Wisely & Reduce Your Risks!

Pricing Arrangements: Choose Your Contract Type Wisely & Reduce Your Risks!. Breakout Session # 304 Jo Cunningham April 7, 2009 2:30 PM. Selecting the contract pricing arrangement is THE most important decision you will ever make!. AVOID Cost Plus Percentage of Cost. 2.

monifa
Download Presentation

Pricing Arrangements: Choose Your Contract Type Wisely & Reduce Your Risks!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pricing Arrangements: Choose Your Contract Type Wisely & Reduce Your Risks! Breakout Session # 304 Jo Cunningham April 7, 2009 2:30 PM

  2. Selecting the contract pricing arrangement is THE most important decision you will ever make! AVOID Cost Plus Percentage of Cost 2

  3. What’s Really in it For Me? Describe how you saved us $10 MillionAND reduced our risks!

  4. Contract Types • Two Basic Pricing Arrangements: • Fixed Price • FFP, FFP/EPA, FP+AF, FP+I, FF Rate, Cost-Share • Cost Reimbursement • CNF, CPFF, CPIF, CPAW, Cost-Share • T&M, LH 4

  5. Failure is NOT an Option! • Firm Fixed Price: Failure is not an option • Time & Materials: We can’t fail as long as we show up for work. • Cost Reimbursable: We will give it our best try, but failure may be an option 5

  6. Statement of Work Is Crucial • The SOW: • First and most important basis for pricing arrangement selection. • The pricing arrangement must be consistent with the SOW in its final form. 6

  7. Cost Risk & Contract Type Cost Risk: High >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Low Requirement Definition Vague >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well Defined Production Concept Exploratory Test/ Full scale Full Stages Studies, & Development Demo Development Production Basic Research Contract Varied CPFF CPIF, CPIF, FPIF, FFP, FPIF, Type FPIF or FFP or FPEPA 7

  8. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Fixed Price • Principle Risks: None, Contractor assumes all cost risk. • Use When: The requirement is well-defined. • Contractors are experienced in meeting the fixed price. • Market conditions are stable. • Financial risks are otherwise insignificant. • Elements: A firm fixed-price for each line item or one or more groupings of line items. • Contractor is required to: Provide acceptable deliverable at the time, place and price specified in the contract. 8

  9. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Fixed Price • Contractor Incentive: Generally realizes an additional dollar of profit for every dollar that costs are reduced • Typical Application: Commercial supplies and services. • Primary Limitations: Generally NOT appropriate for R&D. • Variants: Firm Fixed-price Level of Effort. 9

  10. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Fixed Price Economic Price Adjustment • - Principle Risks: Unstable market prices for labor or material over life of contract. • - Use When: Market prices at risk are severable and significant. Risks stem from industry-wide contingencies beyond contractor's control. Dollars at risk outweigh administrative burdens of an FPEPA. • - Elements: Fixed-price, ceiling on upward adjustment, & a formula for adjusting prices up or down based on established prices, actual labor or material costs, labor or material indices. • - Contractor is required to: Provide acceptable deliverable at the time and place specified in the contract at the adjusted price. 10

  11. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Fixed Price Economic Price Adjustment • Contractor Incentive: Generally realizes an additional dollar of profit for every dollar that costs are reduced. • Typical Application: Long-term contracts for commercial supplies during a period of high inflation. • Primary Limitations: Must be justified. • Variants: None. 11

  12. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Fixed Price Incentive Fee • Principle Risks: Moderately uncertain contract labor or material requirements. • Use When: Ceiling price can be established that covers most probable risks inherent in nature of work. Proposed profit sharing formula would motivate contractor to control costs to & meet other objectives. • Elements: Ceiling price; Target cost; Target profit; Delivery, quality, other performance targets; Profit sharing formula. • Contractor is required to: Provide acceptable deliverable at time & place specified in contract, at or below ceiling price. 12

  13. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Fixed Price Incentive Fee • Contractor Incentive: Realizes a higher profit by completing work below ceiling price and/or by meeting objective performance targets. • Typical Application: Production of a major system based on a prototype. • Primary Limitations: Must be justified. Must be negotiated. Contractor must have an adequate accounting system. Cost data must support targets. • Variants: Successive Targets. 13

  14. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Fixed Price Award Fee • Principle Risks: Risk that the user will not be fully satisfied because of judgmental acceptance criteria. • Use When: Judgmental standards can be fairly applied by Award-fee panel. The potential fee is large enough to both: (1) Provide meaningful incentive; (2) Justify related administrative burdens. • Elements: Firm fixed-price; Standards for evaluating performance; Procedures for calculating fee based on performance against standards. • Contractor is required to: Perform at time, place, and price fixed in contract. 14

  15. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Fixed Price Award Fee • Contractor Incentive: Generally realizes an additional dollar of profit for every dollar that costs are reduced; earns an additional fee for satisfying performance standards. • Typical Application: Performance-based service contracts. • Primary Limitations: Must be negotiated. • Variants: None. 15

  16. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Fixed Price Prospective Redetermination • Principle Risks: Costs of performance after the first year because they cannot be estimated with confidence. • Use When: Buyer needs a firm commitment from contractor to deliver supplies /services during subsequent years. Dollars at risk outweigh administrative burdens of FPRP. • Elements: Fixed price for first period; Proposed subsequent periods (12 months apart); Timetable for pricing next period(s). • Contractor is required to: Provide acceptable deliverables at time & place specified in contract at price established for each period. 16

  17. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Fixed Price Prospective Redetermination • Contractor Incentive: For the period of performance, realizes an additional dollar of profit for every dollar that costs are reduced. • Typical Application: Long-term production of spare parts for a major system. • Primary Limitations: MUST be negotiated. Contractor must have an adequate accounting system that supports the pricing periods. Prompt redeterminations. • Variants: Retroactive Redetermination 17

  18. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Cost Plus Incentive Fee • Principle Risks: Highly uncertain & speculative labor hours, labor mix, material requirements (and other things) necessary to perform contract. Buyer assumes risks; benefiting if actual cost is lower than expected cost; losing if work can’t be completed within expected cost of performance. • Use When:Objective relationship can be established between fee & such measures of performance as actual costs, delivery dates, performance benchmarks, etc. • Elements:Target cost; Performance targets; Minimum, maximum & target fee; Formula for adjusting fee based on actual costs and/or performance. • Contractor is required to:Make good faith effort to meet Buyer's needs within estimated cost in the Schedule. 18

  19. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Cost Plus Incentive Fee • Contractor Incentive: Realizes a higher fee by completing work at lower cost and/or by meeting other objective performance targets. • Typical Application: Research and development of prototype for major system. • Primary Limitations: Contractor must have adequate accounting system. Buyer must exercise surveillance during performance to ensure use of efficient methods & cost controls. Must be negotiated. Must be justified. Statutory & regulatory limits on fees that may be negotiated. Must include applicable Limitation of Cost clause at FAR 52.232-20 through 23. • Variants: None. 19

  20. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Cost Plus Award Fee • Principle Risks:Highly uncertain & speculative labor hours, labor mix, material requirements (and other things) necessary to perform contract. Buyer assumes risks inherent in contract; benefiting if actual cost is lower than expected cost; losing if work cannot be completed within expected cost of performance. • Use When:Objective incentive targets are not feasible for critical aspects of performance. Judgmental standards can be fairly applied. Potential fee would provide a meaningful incentive. • Elements:Target cost; Standards for evaluating performance; Base & maximum fee; Procedures for adjusting fee, based on performance against standards. • Contractor is required to:Make good faith effort to meet Buyer's needs within estimated cost in the Schedule. 20

  21. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Cost Plus Award Fee • Contractor Incentive: Realizes a higher fee by meeting judgmental performance standards. • Typical Application: Large scale research study. • Primary Limitations: Contractor must have adequate accounting system. Buyer must exercise surveillance during performance to ensure use of efficient methods & cost controls. Must be negotiated. Must be justified. Statutory & regulatory limits on fees that may be negotiated. Must include applicable Limitation of Cost clause at FAR 52.232-20 through 23. • Variants: None. 21

  22. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Cost Plus Fixed Fee • Principle Risks: Highly uncertain & speculative labor hours, labor mix, material requirements (and other things) necessary to perform contract. Buyer assumes risks inherent in contract; benefiting if actual cost is lower than expected cost; losing if work cannot be completed within expected cost of performance. • Use When: Relating fee to performance (e.g., to actual costs) would be unworkable or of marginal utility. • Elements: Target cost; Fixed fee. • Contractor is required to: Make good faith effort to meet Buyer's needs within estimated cost in the Schedule. 22

  23. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Cost Plus Fixed Fee • Contractor Incentive: Realizes a higher rate of return (i.e., fee divided by total cost) as total cost decreases. • Typical Application: Research study. • Primary Limitations: Contractor must have adequate accounting system. Buyer must exercise surveillance during performance to ensure use of efficient methods & cost controls. Must be negotiated. Must be justified. Statutory & regulatory limits on fees that may be negotiated. Must include applicable Limitation of Cost clause at FAR 52.232-20 through 23. • Variants: Completion or term contract. 23

  24. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Cost-Sharing • Principle Risks: Highly uncertain & speculative labor hours, labor mix, material requirements (and other things) necessary to perform contract. Buyer assumes risks inherent in contract; benefiting if actual cost is lower than expected cost; losing if work cannot be completed within expected cost of performance. • Use When: The contractor expects substantial compensating benefits for absorbing part of the costs and/or foregoing fee. • Elements: Target cost; Agreement on Buyer’s share of cost. • Contractor is required to: Make good faith effort to meet Buyer's needs within estimated cost in the Schedule. 24

  25. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Cost-Sharing • Contractor Incentive: Shares in the cost of providing a deliverable of mutual benefit. • Typical Application: Joint research where Contractor expects to derive long term benefits to his company. • Primary Limitations: Contractor must have adequate accounting system. Buyer must exercise surveillance during performance to ensure use of efficient methods & cost controls. Must be negotiated. Must be justified. Must include applicable Limitation of Cost clause at FAR 52.232-20 through 23. • Variants: Firm fixed price, where Contractor pays all costs over contract price. 25

  26. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Cost No Fee • Principle Risks: Highly uncertain & speculative labor hours, labor mix, material requirements (and other things) necessary to perform contract. Buyer assumes risks inherent in contract; benefiting if actual cost is lower than expected cost; losing if work cannot be completed within expected cost of performance. • Use When: The supplier is a not-for-profit entity. • Elements: Target cost; No fee. • Contractor is required to: Make good faith effort to meet Buyer's needs within estimated cost in the Schedule. 26

  27. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Cost-No-Fee • Contractor Incentive: Providing a deliverable with benefits to both parties; Contractor expects to derive long term benefits to his firm; Enhanced reputation. • Typical Application: Joint research with an educational institutions or other not-for-profit entities. • Primary Limitations: Contractor must have adequate accounting system. Buyer must exercise surveillance during performance to ensure use of efficient methods & cost controls. Must be negotiated. Must be justified. Statutory & regulatory limits on fees that may be negotiated. Must include applicable Limitation of Cost clause at FAR 52.232-20 through 23. • Variants: None. 27

  28. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Time and Materials • Principle Risks: Highly uncertain & speculative labor hours, labor mix, material requirements (and other things) necessary to perform contract. Buyer assumes risks inherent in contract; benefiting if actual cost is lower than expected cost; losing if work cannot be completed within expected cost of performance. • Use When: No other type of contract is suitable (e.g., because costs are too low to justify an audit of the contractor's indirect expenses). • Elements: Ceiling price; Per-hour labor rate includes overhead & profit; Provisions for reimbursing direct material costs. • Contractor is required to: Make good faith effort to meet Buyer's needs within ceiling price. 28

  29. Comparison of Major Contract Types • Time and Materials • Contractor Incentive: None. • Typical Application: Emergency repairs to heating plants and aircraft engines; Contractor support for field exercises. • Primary Limitations: Labor rates must be negotiated. MUST be justified. The Buyer MUST exercise appropriate surveillance to ensure efficient performance. • Variants: Labor Hour (LH) 29

  30. Steps to Selecting Contract Type • Customers Requirements – Talk with them! • Need What? By When??!!?? • Project Management Requirements? • Funding Availability? Limitations of Obligation? Phases? • Complexities and Possible Complications? • Risks? Who should carry the burden of risks? 30

  31. Steps to Selecting Contract Type • 2. Contractor Selection Influences Choices • Not for Profit? • Educational Institution? • Small Businesses? Unsophisticated accounting system? • Does the contractor have a job-cost accounting system? 31

  32. Steps to Selecting Contract Type • Consider revising the SOW to reduce risks • Request your Audit Department to perform and accounting survey if you are considering a Cost-type or T&M contract, where the contractor has no history of performing such contracts for you. • Select the most appropriate pricing arrangement for your contract. 32

  33. The Logic Tree! 33

  34. Three Statements of Work – What Pricing Type Shall We Choose? • Fish & Bad-Boy Finders LLC • Desert Rat Communications, Inc. • Z-Pinchie Consolidated 34

  35. Summary • Initial steps to remember: • Discuss requirements with the customer & compare to the SOW, revising as necessary • Review the pricing types, and consider the pros & cons of each. • Pitfalls: • Avoid cost-type and T&M/LH if contractor has unsophisticated accounting system. • Avoid setting up Contractor for failure. • (using FFP when not appropriate) • Award / Incentive Fees = High Admin costs • Remember: Choosing Wisely Reduces Risks • and may save you potentially significant costs! 35

  36. Summary • Practical approaches are in the briefing on the website, including the Logic Tree, and the Comparison of Major Contract Types (a.k.a. Eye Chart), courtesy of Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy-Contract Pricing Reference Guide. • Questions? 36

More Related