1 / 16

A Revolution in Insurance Company Supervision: Solvency II

A Revolution in Insurance Company Supervision: Solvency II. Yann Le Pallec Managing Director and Head of EMEA Insurance Ratings . Redefining the industry: Regulation, Risk and Global Strategy, IIS/GDV 9th July 2007, Berlin. Agenda. How effective will Solvency II be?

monte
Download Presentation

A Revolution in Insurance Company Supervision: Solvency II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Revolution in Insurance Company Supervision: Solvency II Yann Le Pallec Managing Director and Head of EMEA Insurance Ratings Redefining the industry: Regulation, Risk and Global Strategy, IIS/GDV 9th July 2007, Berlin

  2. Agenda • How effective will Solvency II be? • Will there be more insolvencies under Solvency II? • How transparent will Solvency II be? • Will Solvency II be highly politicised? • Are supervisors and insurers ready? • Will Solvency II result in market consolidation? • Is Solvency 2 likely to have a global impact? • How does Solvency II compare with our rating approach? • How will Solvency II change our rating approach?

  3. How Effective Will Solvency II Be? • Too early to say due to: • Political influence • Calibration of standard model (Pillar 1) • Execution by EC • Execution by member states • Execution by supervisors • Potential for more intelligent and risk-sensitive supervision

  4. Will There Be More Insolvencies Under Solvency II? • Track record in continental Europe is good (not UK) • Difficult to maintain under Solvency II • Political decision needs to be taken regarding tolerance of insurer failure • EC has working hypothesis of risk of ruin probability of 0.5% based on one year horizon • Greater level of risk tolerance than that of many European supervisors and governments historically

  5. How Transparent Will Solvency II Be? • Much more public information under Pillar 3 • Supervisory returns currently not public documents other than U.K. and Ireland • Pillar 2 capital loadings may not be public

  6. Will Solvency II Be Highly Politicised? • Yes • But consultation is happening well in advance of implementation • The potential political consequences of Solvency II : • Policyholder guarantee schemes to respond to the insurer insolvencies under Solvency II • Pricing will be increasingly risk sensitive with more risks becoming uninsurable or unaffordable (earthquake, flood or construction defects) • Greater disincentives for insurers to hold equity investments • Lower equity content in insurance products offered to consumers • Limiting future retirement financing through pension products

  7. Are Supervisors and Insurers Ready? Supervisor readiness: • UK • Switzerland • Netherlands, Denmark, Portugal • Germany, France, Italy, Spain Companies’ readiness: Similar except CRO Forum members

  8. Will Solvency II Result In Consolidation? • It will accelerate consolidation • Consolidation is already advanced in many markets • In much of Continental Europe consolidation still has a long way to go • But regardless of Solvency II, survival depends on: • being good at what you do, and either • having scale and/or diversity, or • having a defendable niche • Added transparency

  9. Direct Market Impacts • Capital requirements to increase substantially but partly covered by available capital • No industry-wide capital raising, but some will need to. Some owners will have the capacity and willingness to contribute new capital, others will not. • Pillar 1 diversification benefits will give the bigger, more diversified groups capital relief and a pricing advantage • Smaller insurers may find it increasingly difficult to compete while providing similar returns to their owners • Risk management capability and sophistication required to respond to Solvency II is demanding • Systems overhauls may be needed, actuarial skills are in short supply

  10. Is Solvency 2 Likely To Have A Global Impact? • Principles-based risk sensitive regulation is becoming the norm • 80’s: US led the way (RBC models) • Late 90’s: Canada (DCAT) • More recently: Australia, UK (ICAS) and Switzerland (SST) • From 2012: EU? • State-based US system stifling regulatory innovation • Eg long-discussed formation of REO, with modest impact • Principles-based reserving discussions likely to take years to finalise • Policy forms and premium rates still needing regulatory approval for most LoB’s. • The Optional Federal Charter solution? • IAIS has now got real traction • Global footprint of CFO forum members

  11. How Does Solvency II Compare With S&P’s Rating Approach? • Converging but differentiated approaches • Some common interests with supervisors • “A rating is a rehearsal for Solvency II”

  12. Management & corp. strategy Enterprise risk management Industry risk Competitiveposition Operating performance Capitalisation Capital adequacy Reserves Reinsurance ceded Investments and Liquidity Financial flexibility Pillar 3 Pillar 2 Pillar 3 Pillar 3 Pillar 3 Pillar 1 Pillar 1 Pillar 3 Elements of S&P Analysis Mapped to Solvency II

  13. How Will Solvency II Change S&P Rating Approach? • Overall approach unlikely to change • However: • Understand any concerns the supervisor has arising from Solvency II supervision • Supervisory view of capital adequacy will become more important • Industry risks will change

  14. Contact me on +33 (0)1 44 20 67 25 or at yann_lepallec@sandp.com

  15. Appendix: S&P Commentaries 5 July 2006: Credit FAQ: The Impact Of Solvency II On The European Insurance Market 30 May 2007:Beware Solvency II: As The 2010 Implementation Date Looms Closer, European Insurers Should Ignore It At Their Peril

  16. Analytic services and products provided by Standard & Poor’s are the result of separate activities designed to preserve the independence and objectivity of each analytic process. Standard & Poor’s has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of non-public information received during each analytic process.

More Related