1 / 14

Written by T.K.H. Teh , P. Shi, X. Ren, J.H.P. Hui , S.L. Toh , and J.C.H. Goh

Ligament-to-bone Interface Tissue Regeneration Using a Functionalized Biphasic Silk Fibroin Scaffold. Written by T.K.H. Teh , P. Shi, X. Ren, J.H.P. Hui , S.L. Toh , and J.C.H. Goh Reviewed by Brandon Smith. Background Information.

morela
Download Presentation

Written by T.K.H. Teh , P. Shi, X. Ren, J.H.P. Hui , S.L. Toh , and J.C.H. Goh

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ligament-to-bone Interface Tissue Regeneration Using a Functionalized Biphasic Silk Fibroin Scaffold Written by T.K.H. Teh, P. Shi, X. Ren, J.H.P. Hui, S.L. Toh, and J.C.H. Goh Reviewed by Brandon Smith

  2. Background Information • Current prevailing method for repairing a torn Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) is tendon autografts • Difficulties associated with this method • Limitation of donor site morbidity • Lack of graft integration with bone tunnel • Current Regenerative Engineering Attempts • Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) seeded scaffolds for ligament-only regeneration • Successful in regenerating the ACL and epiligament with the existence of vasculature • Difficulties associated with this method • Limited bone insertion points • Significant decrease in load bearing capacity

  3. Objective • Using a functionalized biphasic silk fibroin scaffold to properly form ACL along with bone tunnel tissues • On either end of the scaffold, hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (nHA) and bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP2) were added to stimulate the regrowth of bone tunnel and enthesis • Central third of the scaffold left with the MSCs for ligament regeneration • Using rabbit and pig models to test this method

  4. Methods and Materials • Scaffold Fabrication • In the Rabbit Model for in vivo characterization and in vitro characterization, they used knitted scaffolds with 240 fibroins, 60 x 20 mm • In the Pig model for in vivo characterization, they used scaffolds with 480 fibroins, 100 x 20 mm • Fabrication of osteogenic and tenogenic zones • Created three silk fibroin solutions: • Pure silk fibroin solution (2.6% w/v) • Aqueous silk fibroin (2.6% w/v) with nHA (.78 mg/end) • Aqueous silk fibroin (2.6% w/v), nHA (.78 mg/end), and BMP2 (29 ug/end) • Casted and froze multiple silk fibroin solutions on the knitted scaffold based on experimental group • Control group: Aqueous silk fibroin with nHA, pure aqueous silk fibroin, silk fibroin with nHA • Experimental group: aqueous silk fibroin with both, pure aqueous silk fibroin, silk fibroin with both

  5. Methods and Materials • In Vitro Characterization • Cut the scaffolds at the phase boundaries to form three scaffolds with just pure silk fibroin, silk fibroin and nHA, and silk fibroin with both nHA and BMP2 • Rabbit MSCs were derived from bone marrow, seeded on the scaffolds, and cultured over 28 days • In Vivo Characterization • Rabbit Groups • Seeded the two types of bone scaffold, experimental and control, with rabbit MSCs and then were implanted into 48 rabbits • The rabbits were sacrificed at 2, 4, and 6 months • Pig Groups • Removed the ACL of the right knees of the pigs, then added the two types of scaffolds, having been seeded with pig MSCs. • The pigs were sacrificed at the 6 month mark

  6. Methods and Materials: Critique • Major parts of this section were very vague by not giving full explanations of the full procedure • Never explains the characterization techniques used to acquire the data reported in the results sections • ex: “Characterization assays performed for cellular viability, proliferation, gene expression, and collagen deposition levels” • Scaffold characteristics • Only deeper explanation reported is the number of replicates used during each test

  7. Results: Scaffold Morphology • This image shows that the scaffold contains interconnected pores • Critique • Caption says nHA and BMP2 are “securely incorporated”, but the image does not label either of those

  8. Results: Elution Profile • This graph shows a similar response from physiological bone • Begins with large amounts of BMP2 at the onset • followed by smaller and smaller amounts for maintenance purposes and continued bone regrowth

  9. Results: Gene Expression, Proliferation, and Collage Deposition • Shows the gene expression for the in vitro study. • the scaffold containing both nHA and BMP2 experienced the most growth in all of the 5 categories tested • Also shows the formation of collagen • Critique: • Only briefly explains what three of the five categories are

  10. Results: Gross Observation of Excised Pig Knee Joints • Image A shows the regrowth of the ACL in the pig model from the control group • Image B shows the regrowth of the ACL in the pig model from the experimental group • Both are 6 month mark • Critique: • No image of what the ACL looked like before they began the whole procedure

  11. Results: Micro – Ct images of excised Pig Femur • Micro CT images of the control (A) and experimental (D) pig femur • The box shows the original bone tunnel location • The arrow shows new calcified tissue deposition • Critique: • They give percentages of regrowth (6%, 68% for control and experimental respectively), but no scale bars or actual numbers

  12. Results: Histological Images of Graft-Bone Interface • Images C and D show the histological images of the graft-bone interaction at 6 months post implantation for the control group and experimental group, respectively. • The arrows shows new calcified tissue deposition • The S is the silk scaffold remnant

  13. Results: Mechanical Properties of Regenerated Anterior Cruciate Ligaments • This table shows the mechanical properties for • The original ACL • The previous scaffold method • The control scaffold group • The experimental scaffold group • The experimental is most like the original ACL in terms of both stiffness and maximum load for the TE ligament and ligament-bone interface • Critique: • Give a good control group in the original ACL for determining the effectiveness of the scaffold • Still no explanation of the tests performed

  14. Conclusion and Overall Critique • Overall, the paper was very interesting, and could be deemed a success in terms of regenerating the bone tunnel and consequentially, a strong ACL • However the format was difficult to follow at some points • Would speak of the characterization techniques they used to find all the data, but never explained what those techniques were • Following some of the material in this article required previous knowledge of the subject, or outside research as to what some of the figures and methods referred to

More Related