1 / 8

THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND THE PRACTICE OF LAW

THE DISCIPLINARY SYSTEM IN MISSOURI Structure : 4 S.Ct. - appointed agencies Advisory Committee (AC) (state-wide jur .) at least 6 lawyers and 2 laypersons assign hearing panels for specific cases issue formal advisory opinions adopt regulation s . E. DISCIPLINE.

moriah
Download Presentation

THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND THE PRACTICE OF LAW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THE DISCIPLINARY SYSTEM IN MISSOURI • Structure: 4 S.Ct.- appointed agencies • Advisory Committee (AC) (state-wide jur.) • at least 6 lawyers and 2 laypersons • assign hearing panels for specific cases • issue formal advisory opinions • adopt regulations E. DISCIPLINE THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND THE PRACTICE OF LAW

  2. Missouri Disc. System c’t’d • Regional Disciplinary Committees (RDC) • 17 in all (one or more judicial circuits) • at least 4 lawyers and 2 lay members • Chief Disciplinary Counsel (CDC) • counsel for bar in disc. proceedings, conduct investigations • may give non-binding informal opinions on questions of concern to a particular lawyer • Disciplinary Hearing Panels (DHP) • hold hearings on assignment • 2 lawyers, 1 lay member on each

  3. Missouri System c’t’d • Investigation • by CDC, or RDC at request of CDC or AC • standard: probable cause • procedure: informal (grand jury) w/ record • outcome: • referral to consensual resolution programs if appropriate, or diversion program for minor offenses • if finding of PC: • written admonition (resp. accept or reject), or • prepare information for filing w/ S.Ct. • resp. answer – default is consent to discipline w/o hearing

  4. MO DISC. PROCEDURE c’t’d • [Investigation] • [outcome] • if finding of no PC: dismissal, unless complainant requests review by AC • Hearing • by DHP assigned by AC, or by S.Ct. special master on request of AC chair • civil rules and burden of proof, full record • outcome: finding on each charge, dismissal or • written admonition (both parties must agree), or • recommendation of sanction (public reprimand, suspend, disbar)

  5. review by S.Ct. • either party can have entire record transferred to S.Ct. • procedure as by original writ • S.Ct. makes independent findings and determination of “appropriate discipline” • Trial (if no DHP hearing) • by S.Ct. or by special master appointed • civil non-jury rules and burden of proof • if by master, findings and recommendations required, briefed and argued before S.Ct. as under original writ

  6. Some Basic Notions • Purpose of disciplinary action: protection of the public from incompetent, unreliable or misbehaving lawyers • civil, not criminal process • suppose lawyer is given immunity from prosecution to elicit testimony in criminal case: can that testimony be used against him in a disciplinary proceeding? • can lawyer invoke privilege against self-incrimination?

  7. Basic notions c’t’d • Due Process? • an information is filed against a lawyer after investigation, and a hearing is held • after the hearing is concluded, bar counsel moves to amend the information to add a charge based on the evidence presented; • the motion is granted, and the lawyer is found guilty of misconduct as charged in the amendment • has the disciplinary authority denied the lawyer due process of law? In re Ruffalo, n. 3 p. 89

  8. Basic notions c’t’d • Can a lawyer be disciplined in her home state for misconduct committed in another state, based on the factual findings made in disciplinary proceedings in that other state? • ABA: presumptive conclusive effect, absent denial of due process or failure of proof convincing the authorities that they can’t be accepted • some jurs. allow new evidence if there was good reason that it wasn’t introduced in first proceeding • Missouri : CDC files information, and S.Ct. issues an order to show cause why the findings should not be conclusive

More Related