1 / 14

TMC Engine Summit March 16, 2004

TMC Engine Summit March 16, 2004. Steve Duley Vice President Purchasing. DEDICATED. EXPEDITED - TEAMS. INTERMODAL. > > >. Diversified Truckload Carrier and Logistics Provider. ONE-WAY VAN. BROKERAGE. Serving North America. BULK. SPECIALIZED. Spot Brokerage • Glass Brokerage •

morty
Download Presentation

TMC Engine Summit March 16, 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TMC Engine SummitMarch 16, 2004 Steve Duley Vice President Purchasing

  2. DEDICATED EXPEDITED - TEAMS INTERMODAL > > > Diversified Truckload Carrier and Logistics Provider ONE-WAY VAN BROKERAGE Serving North America BULK SPECIALIZED Proprietary & Confidential

  3. Spot Brokerage • Glass Brokerage • Tariff Based • Brokerage OptiModal • TruckRail • Intermodal One-Way Van • Dedicated • Expedited • Specialized • Bulk • Truckload Operating Services • Application Services • SFI • INS • Payment Services • New Ventures • Logistics Financial Services Schneider National • $2.9 billion in revenue in 2003 • Operate 12,000 tractors, 15,200 drivers, and 45,000 trailers with 20,800 associates operating in 28 countries • Purchase $1.5 billion in 3rd party transportation from 1,300 carriers • Pay 20 million invoices totaling $7 billion to 8,500 carriers • Commitment to superior information and communications technology Proprietary & Confidential

  4. Engine Review Post October 2002 – January 2004

  5. Engine Evaluation Table – Last Update 1/19/04 Proprietary & Confidential

  6. Post October 2002 Engine – Evaluation Results • Purchase price over $5,000 per engine. • MPG loss 3-5%. (10 years of progress – lost!) • Oil drain interval same as post 1998 engines. • One engine teardown @ 250,000 miles was normal. • Driver feedback – “acceptable – good performance.” • Reliability first 250,000 miles (30% life) is ok. • Some early failures of every significant EGR component i.e. VGT turbo, EGR valve, VPOD, sensors, pipes, EGR coolers. • Concerned about operating costs/reliability as vehicle ages: • Warranty ends. • More parts to maintain. • High cost parts. • More complex troubleshooting. • Significant improvements have occurred since 10/2002. Proprietary & Confidential

  7. Engine Component Price Comparison Proprietary & Confidential

  8. Post 2002 engine will increase operating costs by 2-3 cents/mile. Government Regulations Increasing Engine Costs Total Cost of ’02 Engines Proprietary & Confidential

  9. Engine Review 2007-2010 Engine

  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 EGR with aParticulate Filter Approach Variable Geometry Turbocharger Air to Air Cooler Intercooler NOx Reduction with Increased EGR Rates C Catalyzed Particulate Filter T EGR Control Valve EGR Cooler Particulate Filter to be Integrated into the Vehicle Exhaust System Proprietary & Confidential

  11. Diesel Particulate Filter Concerns Catalyzed Particulate Filter • Initial and replacement price (precious metals?). • Active regeneration process. • Maintenance interval. • Maintenance process. • No heavy truck experience. • Requires low sulfated ash oil (possible unique oil). • Reduced life with LSD fuel. • Overall operating cost. Particulate Filter to be Integrated into the Vehicle Exhaust System Proprietary & Confidential

  12. Government Regulations Increasing Engine Costs Total Cost of ’02 and ’07 Engines * Revised 2/2004 Proprietary & Confidential

  13. SNI View of 2007 • SCR should be approved. • Must receive adequate representative field test engines by mid-year 2005. • Cost estimates are much higher than EPA’s estimate. • EPA should reforecast costs. • A government funded financial incentive is needed. • Without a successful field test AND incentive. • Significant prebuy followed by a long interval no/slow buy. • Cost/recovery challenge. • Cumulative cost impact – i.e. health care, litigation, insurance, hour of service changes, driver wages. • Raise prices – lose freight. • Transition – compete with old technology. • Support Clean Air • “Win-Win” solution needed. Proprietary & Confidential

  14. How Long Can Fleets Slow/No Buy? Proprietary & Confidential

More Related